Cited by 47Marine animal studies overviewOil Spill Detection and MitigationEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Effects of oiling on exercise physiology and diving behavior of river otters: a captive study

Ben-David, M, Williams, T M, Ormseth, O A·2000·Canadian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Following the Exxon Valdez oil spill (EVOS), river otters (Lontra canadensis) on oiled shores had lower body mass, selected different habitat characters, and had larger home ranges and less diverse diets than did otters living in non-oiled areas. We explored the possibility that these changes were due to the effect of crude oil contamination on physiological and behavioral processes in otters. Fifteen otters were exposed to two levels of oil contamination under captive controlled conditions at the Alaska Sealife Center in Seward, Alaska, U.S.A. We collected blood samples for hematological examinations and measured oxygen consumption in otters exercising on a motorized treadmill. We also observed diving and foraging behavior of otters offered live fish. Otters exposed to oil became anemic relative to controls. While oxygen consumption of resting river otters was not related to changes in hemoglobin concentration, exercising river otters with decreased hemoglobin levels displayed significantly increased oxygen consumption (P = 0.042). Oiled otters also performed fewer dives when chasing fish (P = 0.04), representing a potential decrease of 64% in the capture rate of prey. Our data strongly support the hypothesis that changes in prey types and home-range utilization by oiled river otters following EVOS were influenced by hematological changes, associated increases in energetic costs, and reduced diving ability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/z00-059

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • River otters have a high basal metabolism relative to similarly sized mammals.

    “River otters have a high basal metabolism relative to similarly sized mammals (Kruuk et al. 1994; Ben‐David et al. 2000), and thermo‐regulation in water is their primary source of energy expenditure while foraging (rather than locomotion) (Kruuk et al. 1997; Pfeiffer and Culik 1998).”

    From River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America (2025) · cites this paper as Ben‐David et al. 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben-David, M., Williams, T. M., & Ormseth, O. A.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Published
2000-08-01
Volume
78
Issue
8
Pages
1380-1390
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
OpenAlex
W2132839519
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alaska Department of Fish and Game
  • Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council
  • University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
river otter, Lontra canadensis, crude oil contamination, oil spill impacts, Exxon Valdez oil spill, anemia, hemoglobin, oxygen consumption, exercise physiology, diving behavior, foraging behavior, prey capture, home range, diet, hematological changes, energetic cost

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review