CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 482Vector-borne infectious diseasesZoonotic diseases and public healthMosquito-borne diseases and control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biodiversity series: The function of biodiversity in the ecology of vector-borne zoonotic diseases

Ostfeld, Richard S, Keesing, Felicia·2000·Canadian Journal of Zoology
DOI 10.1139/z00-172
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This is a critical evaluation of the influence of species diversity within communities of vertebrates on the risk of human exposure to vector-borne zoonoses. Vertebrates serve as natural reservoirs of many disease agents (viral, bacterial, protozoal) that are transmitted to humans by blood-feeding arthropod vectors. We describe the natural history of the Lyme disease zoonosis to illustrate interactions among pathogens, vectors, vertebrate hosts, and risk to humans. We then describe how the presence of a diverse assemblage of vertebrates can dilute the impact of the principal reservoir (the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus) of Lyme disease spirochetes (Borrelia burgdorferi), thereby reducing the disease risk to humans. Exploring the logic of what we call the dilution effect reveals four conditions that are necessary for it to apply generally to vector-borne zoonoses: (1) the feeding habits of the vector are generalized; (2) the pathogen is acquired by the vector from hosts (as opposed to exclusively transovarial transmission); (3) reservoir competence (the ability of a particular host species to infect a vector) varies among host species; and (4) the most competent reservoir host tends to be a community dominant, as defined by the proportion of the tick population fed by that species. When these conditions are met, vertebrate communities with high species diversity will contain a greater proportion of incompetent reservoir hosts that deflect vector meals away from the most competent reservoirs, thereby reducing infection prevalence and disease risk. Incorporating the likelihood that the abundance of competent reservoirs is reduced in more diverse communities, owing to the presence of predators and competitors, reinforces the impact of the dilution effect on the density of infected vectors. A review of the literature reveals the generality, though not the universality, of these conditions, which suggests that the effects of diversity on disease risk may be widespread. Issues in need of further exploration include (i) the relative importance of diversity per se versus fluctuating numbers of particular species; (ii) the relevance of species richness versus evenness to the dilution effect; (iii) whether the dilution effect operates at both local and regional scales; and (iv) the shape of empirically determined curves relating diversity to measures of disease risk. Further studies linking community ecology with epidemiology are warranted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/z00-172

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 121 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Anderson J.F., 1984, Yale J. Biol. Med., 57, 627
  2. Barnes A.M., 1993, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep., 28
  3. Boromisa R.D., 1990, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc., 6, 504
  4. Camicas J.L., 1990, Arch. Virol., 1, 303
  5. El Sibae M.M., 1993, J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 23, 667
  6. Githure J.I., 1996, East Afr. Med. J., 73, 44
  7. Humair P.-F., 1993, Folia Parasitol., 40, 65
  8. Lee H.L., 1997, Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health, 28, 230
  9. Molyneux D., 1980, Appl., 1, 59
  10. Molyneux D.H., 1997, Ann. Trop. Med. Parisitol., 91, 827
  11. Mourya D.T., 1987, Indian J. Med. Res., 85, 593
  12. Ostfeld R.S., 1997, Am. Sci., 85, 338
  13. Rosenblatt D.L., 1999, Am. Midl. Nat., 32, 765
  14. Schopen S., 1990, Acta Virol., 35, 373
  15. Telford S.R., III, 1990, J. Parasitol., 75, 681
  16. Turell M.J., 1983, Prog. Clin. Biol. Res., 123, 43
  17. Yaghoobi-Ershadi M.R., 1996, Iran. Bull. W.H.O., 74, 587

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ostfeld, R. S., & Keesing, F.
ORCID
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
78
Issue
12
Pages
2061-2078
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
DOI
10.1139/z00-172
OpenAlex
W2767385477
Semantic Scholar
3f3d36f202dcd8c1782284b035930a76e98eee38
Cited by
482
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 27
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining (tdm)
Locations
Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Keywords
dilution effect, biodiversity, vector-borne zoonoses, Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, white-footed mouse, reservoir hosts, tick vectors, species diversity, host competence, species richness, species evenness, disease risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review