Cited by 1,124Zoonotic diseases and public healthViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases

Open access
Allen, Toph, Murray, Kris A., Zambrana-Torrelio, Carlos, Morse, Stephen S., Rondinini, Carlo, Di Marco, Moreno, Breit, Nathan, Olival, Kevin J. +1 more·2017·Nature Communications

Abstract

Zoonoses originating from wildlife represent a significant threat to global health, security and economic growth, and combatting their emergence is a public health priority. However, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying their emergence remains rudimentary. Here we update a global database of emerging infectious disease (EID) events, create a novel measure of reporting effort, and fit boosted regression tree models to analyze the demographic, environmental and biological correlates of their occurrence. After accounting for reporting effort, we show that zoonotic EID risk is elevated in forested tropical regions experiencing land-use changes and where wildlife biodiversity (mammal species richness) is high. We present a new global hotspot map of spatial variation in our zoonotic EID risk index, and partial dependence plots illustrating relationships between events and predictors. Our results may help to improve surveillance and long-term EID monitoring programs, and design field experiments to test underlying mechanisms of zoonotic disease emergence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-017-00923-8

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Geographic comparisons through large-scale correlational studies based on the "total host diversity" model have tended to report a weak but positive effect of mammal species richness on zoonotic diseases, but these studies show much stronger positive correlations with other factors, such as human population density.

    “Geographic comparisons through large-scale correlational studies (based on the “total host diversity” model in Fig. 1) have tended to report a weak but positive effect of mammal species richness on zoonotic diseases, but these studies show much stronger positive correlations with other factors, such as human population density (e.g., refs. 5 and 17).”

    From Impacts of biodiversity and biodiversity loss on zoonotic diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [34]Loh, E. H., Murray, K. A., Nava, A., Aguirre, A. A. & Daszak, P. in Tropical Conservation: Perspectives on Local and Global Priorities (eds Aguirre, A. A. & Sukumar, B.) Ch. 6, 79–88 (Oxford University Press, 2016).
  2. [57]PubMed Central FTP Service. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/tools/ftp/ (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, T., Murray, K. A., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., Morse, S. S., Rondinini, C., Di Marco, M., Breit, N., Olival, K. J., & Daszak, P.
Affiliations
  • EcoHealth Alliance (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Daszak, Peter
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2017-10-24
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1124-1124
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765563228
Cited by
1,124
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 190 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
53.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
United States Agency for International Development (AIDOAAA1400102)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
zoonoses, emerging infectious diseases, tropical forests, land use change, mammal species richness, disease hotspots, disease surveillance, boosted regression trees, partial dependence
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Wild, Demography, Disease Reservoirs, Geography, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Regression Analysis, Risk, Tropical Climate, Global Health, Zoonoses, Area Under Curve, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Biodiversity, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review