The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future
Abstract
I reviewed 138 cases in which terrestrial vertebrates received supplemental food under field conditions. These cases are strongly biased toward small-bodied herbivores in north temperate environments. Most studies address population level questions and have supplied food over a short term (< 1 year) and on a small spatial scale (to less than 50 individuals). Individuals receiving supplemental food usually had smaller home ranges, higher body weights, and advanced breeding relative to those on control areas. The typical population response to food supplementation was two- to three-fold increase in density, but no change in the pattern of population dynamics. In particular, food addition did not prevent major declines in fluctuating populations. Researchers have failed to examine behaviour of individuals under conditions of supplemental food when addressing questions of population regulation. This review points to the need for researchers to conduct food supplementation experiments in tropical environments, on a larger scale, and over longer periods of time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Chain Dynamics: The Central Theory of Ecology?
Fretwell, S. D. (1987) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3565489 · Cited by 402
Cited by
Sex and Death: What Is the Connection?
Partridge, L., Gems, D., & Withers, D. J. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.026 · Cited by 402
Wildlife health and supplemental feeding: A review and management recommendations
Murray, M. H., Becker, D. J., Hall, R. J., & Hernandez, S. M. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.034 · Cited by 267
Chapman, C. A., Wasserman, M. D., Gillespie, T. R., Speirs, M. L., Lawes, M. J., Saj, T. L., & Ziegler, T. E. (2006) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20477 · Cited by 255
Optimal annual routines: behaviour in the context of physiology and ecology
McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2141 · Cited by 216
Kronfeld-Schor (2013) · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2821 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Boutin, S.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1990-02-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-220
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W2007284370
- Cited by
- 902
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/z90-031
- The paper
- Boutin, S. (1990). Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future. Canadian Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.