Diet and habitat selection of wood bison in relation to seasonal changes in forage quantity and quality
Abstract
Diet and habitat selection of wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) were studied in the Mackenzie Bison Sanctuary, Northwest Territories, between February 1986 and April 1988. Wood bison showed pronounced seasonal changes in diet. Sedges constituted 96.1–98.8% of the winter diet. During summer, the diet became a more diverse mix of sedge (Carex spp.), grass (Graminae), and willow (Salix spp.). Lichen (Cladina mitis) became a major dietary component in fall. Summer browsing on willows increased when sedge standing crops were reduced. Forage availability was the main factor determining habitat selection. Wet sedge meadows provided the most available crude protein in winter and were the preferred winter habitat. Willow savannas provided the most available crude protein in summer and were the preferred summer habitat. Between June and October, all forages except lichen decreased in nitrogen content and increased in fibre content. The lack of distinct habitat preference in fall corresponded to dispersion of animals into forested habitats, increased use of lichen as forage, and more homogeneous availability of crude protein among habitats. Snow conditions were harsher in 1987–1988 than in 1986–1987, which affected forage availability and caused a noticeable shift in habitat use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The amount of browsing varies with season and availability of shrubs and other forage.
“The amount of browsing varies with season and availability of shrubs and other forage (Bork et al., 2013; Larter & Gates, 1991; Peden, 1976; Waggoner & Hinkes, 1986; Zeigenfuss & Schoenecker, 2021).”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Larter & Gates, 1991
Cites
Bisoniana LXVI. Comparison of forage intake and digestibility by American bison, yak and cattle
Richmond, R. J., Hudson, R. J., & Christopherson, R. J. (1977) · Acta Theriologica · doi:10.4098/at.arch.77-17 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Divergent patterns of riparian cottonwood recovery after the return of wolves in Yellowstone, USA
Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2015) · Ecohydrology · doi:10.1002/eco.1487 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings
Painter, L. E., Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2023) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.10369 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Larter, N. C., & Gates, C. C.
- ORCID
- Larter, Nicholas C.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1991-10-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2677-2685
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W2071067072
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- wood bison, Bison bison athabascae, diet selection, habitat selection, seasonal diet variation, forage availability, forage quality, Cyperaceae, willow, lichens, crude protein, fiber content, snow conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review