Cited by 37Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyLivestock Farming and Management

Bisoniana LXVI. Comparison of forage intake and digestibility by American bison, yak and cattle

Open access
Richmond, R. J., Hudson, R. J., Christopherson, R. J.·1977·Acta Theriologica

Abstract

Feed intake, selectivity and apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter, protein and detergent fiber fractions were determined in groups of four yearling bison, yak and cattle. Diets of contrasting quality for these comparisons were provided by native sedge meadow hay, bromefescue grass hay and alfalfa hay. Oznaczono zapotrzebowanie pokarmowe, wybiórczość i współczynniki strawności suchej masy, białka oraz skladników węglowodanowych u rocznych bizonów, jaków i bydła. Do doświadczeń wzięto po cztery zwierzęta każdego gatunku i karmiono je sianem turzycy, stokłosy kostrzewy lub lucerny, zróżnicowanym pod względem zawartości włókna (Tabela 1).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4098/at.arch.77-17

Cites

0 references resolved

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consistently low temperatures and low primary productivity in the range of the wild yak, and most domestic yaks, result in a strategy of heat conservation rather than heat production, although digestive efficiency of low-quality forage may be enhanced.

    “Consistently low temperatures and low primary productivity in the range of the wild yak, and most domestic yaks, result in a strategy of heat conservation rather heat production (Sarkar et al. 1999a;Wiener et al. 2003), although digestive efficiency of low-quality forage may be enhanced (Richmond et al. 1977;Schaefer et al. 1978).”

    From Bos grunniens and Bos mutus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2009) · cites this paper as Richmond et al. 1977

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. A ssociation of O fficial A g ricu ltu ral Chem ists, 1960: O fficial M ethods of A nalysis of the A ssociation of Official A g ricu ltu ra l C hem ists. 9th Edition.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richmond, R. J., Hudson, R. J., & Christopherson, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Acta Theriologica
Published
1977-09-15
Volume
22
Pages
225-230
ISSN
  • 0001-7051 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-3743
OpenAlex
W2004723756
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACTA THERIOLOGICA (publishedVersion)
  • RCIN (Digital Repository of the Scientifics Institutes) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
Keywords
American bison, yak, cattle, forage intake, apparent digestibility, dry matter digestibility, protein digestibility, detergent fiber, alfalfa hay, fiber content, ruminant nutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review