The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of forest patch area on population attributes of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in fragmented landscapes
Abstract
We studied population densities, sex ratios, adult masses, reproductive activity, age structure, and over-summer recapture rates of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in 15 woodlots of various sizes and three continuous-forest sites to ascertain the effects of forest patch area on these population attributes. Our study was conducted in west-central Indiana during spring 1992 and 1993 and autumn 1992. Densities of white-footed mice were inversely related to forested area. A survey of previous studies conducted at similar latitudes revealed a similar pattern. Extremely high densities (up to 200 adults/ha) were found in small woodlots (< 0.5 ha). Mass of adult male mice also was inversely related to forest area, and a positive relationship between proportion of adult male mice and forest area was suggested. Ratios of juveniles to adults were positively related to forest area in autumn but not in spring. The proportion of sexually active individuals in the population was not related to forest area, nor were over-summer recapture rates. Our findings indicate that patch area can have dramatic effects on the structure and dynamics of populations of white-footed mice inhabiting fragmented landscapes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review
SAUNDERS, D. A., HOBBS, R. J., & MARGULES, C. R. (1991) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x · Cited by 4,110
Agricultural influences on movement patterns of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus)
Cummings, J. R., & Vessey, S. H. (1994) · American Midland Naturalist · doi:10.2307/2426575 · Cited by 96
Cited by
Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models
Gu, W., & Swihart, R. K. (2004) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00190-3 · Cited by 788
Self-citationBiodiversity series: The function of biodiversity in the ecology of vector-borne zoonotic diseases
Ostfeld, R. S., & Keesing, F. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z00-172 · Cited by 482
Leighton, P. A., Koffi, J. K., Pelcat, Y., Lindsay, L. R., & Ogden, N. H. (2012) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02112.x · Cited by 273
Gonzalez, A., Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M. (2009) · Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Nupp, T. E., & Swihart, R. K.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1996-03-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 467-472
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W2146462381
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of forest patch area on population attributes of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in fragmented landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/z96-054
- The paper
- Nupp, T. E., & Swihart, R. K. (1996). Effect of forest patch area on population attributes of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in fragmented landscapes. Canadian Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1139/z96-054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.