Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,755

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities

Open access
Brambilla, N., Eidelman, S., Heltsley, B. K., Vogt, R., Bodwin, G. T., Eichten, E., Frawley, A. D., Meyer, A. B., Mitchell, R. E., Papadimitriou, V., Petreczky, P., Petrov, A. A., Robbe, P., Vairo, A., Andronic, A., Arnaldi, R., Artoisenet, P., Bali, G., Bertolin, A., Bettoni, D., Brodzicka, J., Bruno, G. E., Caldwell, A., Catmore, J., Chang, C.-H., Chao, K.-T., Chudakov, E., Cortese, P., Crochet, P., Drutskoy, A., Ellwanger, U., Faccioli, P., Gabareen Mokhtar, A., Garcia i Tormo, X., Hanhart, C., Harris, F. A., Kaplan, D. M., Klein, S. R., Kowalski, H., Lansberg, J.-P., Levichev, E., Lombardo, V., Lourenço, C., Maltoni, F., Mocsy, A., Mussa, R., Navarra, F. S., Negrini, M., Nielsen, M., Olsen, S. L., Pakhlov, P., Pakhlova, G., Peters, K., Polosa, A. D., Qian, W., Qiu, J.-W., Rong, G., Sanchis-Lozano, M. A., Scomparin, E., Senger, P., Simon, F., Stracka, S., Sumino, Y., Voloshin, M., Weiss, C., Wöhri, H. K., Yuan, C.-Z.·2011·The European Physical Journal C

Abstract

A golden age for heavy-quarkonium physics dawned a decade ago, initiated by the confluence of exciting advances in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and an explosion of related experimental activity. The early years of this period were chronicled in the Quarkonium Working Group (QWG) CERN Yellow Report (YR) in 2004, which presented a comprehensive review of the status of the field at that time and provided specific recommendations for further progress. However, the broad spectrum of subsequent breakthroughs, surprises, and continuing puzzles could only be partially anticipated. Since the release of the YR, the BESII program concluded only to give birth to BESIII; the B-factories and CLEO-c flourished; quarkonium production and polarization measurements at HERA and the Tevatron matured; and heavy-ion collisions at RHIC have opened a window on the deconfinement regime. All these experiments leave legacies of quality, precision, and unsolved mysteries for quarkonium physics, and therefore beg for continuing investigations at BESIII, the LHC, RHIC, FAIR, the Super Flavor and/or Tau–Charm factories, JLab, the ILC, and beyond. The list of newly found conventional states expanded to include hc(1P), χc2(2P), $B_{c}^{+}$, and ηb(1S). In addition, the unexpected and still-fascinating X(3872) has been joined by more than a dozen other charmonium- and bottomonium-like “XYZ” states that appear to lie outside the quark model. Many of these still need experimental confirmation. The plethora of new states unleashed a flood of theoretical investigations into new forms of matter such as quark–gluon hybrids, mesonic molecules, and tetraquarks. Measurements of the spectroscopy, decays, production, and in-medium behavior of $c\bar{c}$, $b\bar{b}$, and $b\bar{c}$ bound states have been shown to validate some theoretical approaches to QCD and highlight lack of quantitative success for others. Lattice QCD has grown from a tool with computational possibilities to an industrial-strength effort now dependent more on insight and innovation than pure computational power. New effective field theories for the description of quarkonium in different regimes have been developed and brought to a high degree of sophistication, thus enabling precise and solid theoretical predictions. Many expected decays and transitions have either been measured with precision or for the first time, but the confusing patterns of decays, both above and below open-flavor thresholds, endure and have deepened. The intriguing details of quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions that have emerged from RHIC have elevated the importance of separating hot- and cold-nuclear-matter effects in quark–gluon plasma studies. This review systematically addresses all these matters and concludes by prioritizing directions for ongoing and future efforts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1534-9

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 165 references

Cited by

See all 1,755

Metadata

Authors
Brambilla, N., Eidelman, S., Heltsley, B. K., Vogt, R., Bodwin, G. T., Eichten, E., Frawley, A. D., Meyer, A. B., Mitchell, R. E., Papadimitriou, V., Petreczky, P., Petrov, A. A., Robbe, P., Vairo, A., Andronic, A., Arnaldi, R., Artoisenet, P., Bali, G., Bertolin, A., Bettoni, D., Brodzicka, J., Bruno, G. E., Caldwell, A., Catmore, J., Chang, C.-H., Chao, K.-T., Chudakov, E., Cortese, P., Crochet, P., Drutskoy, A., Ellwanger, U., Faccioli, P., Gabareen Mokhtar, A., Garcia i Tormo, X., Hanhart, C., Harris, F. A., Kaplan, D. M., Klein, S. R., Kowalski, H., Lansberg, J.-P., Levichev, E., Lombardo, V., Lourenço, C., Maltoni, F., Mocsy, A., Mussa, R., Navarra, F. S., Negrini, M., Nielsen, M., Olsen, S. L., Pakhlov, P., Pakhlova, G., Peters, K., Polosa, A. D., Qian, W., Qiu, J.-W., Rong, G., Sanchis-Lozano, M. A., Scomparin, E., Senger, P., Simon, F., Stracka, S., Sumino, Y., Voloshin, M., Weiss, C., Wöhri, H. K., & Yuan, C.-Z.
Venue
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2011-02
Volume
71
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1434-6044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-6052
OpenAlex
W2169127494
Cited by
1,755
References
165
FWCI
93.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1534-9
The paper
Brambilla, N., Eidelman, S., Heltsley, B. K., Vogt, R., Bodwin, G. T., Eichten, E., Frawley, A. D., Meyer, A. B., Mitchell, R. E., Papadimitriou, V., Petreczky, P., Petrov, A. A., Robbe, P., Vairo, A., Andronic, A., Arnaldi, R., Artoisenet, P., Bali, G., Bertolin, A., . . . Yuan, C.-Z. (2011). Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities. The European Physical Journal C. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1534-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.