The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities
Open accessAbstract
A golden age for heavy-quarkonium physics dawned a decade ago, initiated by the confluence of exciting advances in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and an explosion of related experimental activity. The early years of this period were chronicled in the Quarkonium Working Group (QWG) CERN Yellow Report (YR) in 2004, which presented a comprehensive review of the status of the field at that time and provided specific recommendations for further progress. However, the broad spectrum of subsequent breakthroughs, surprises, and continuing puzzles could only be partially anticipated. Since the release of the YR, the BESII program concluded only to give birth to BESIII; the B-factories and CLEO-c flourished; quarkonium production and polarization measurements at HERA and the Tevatron matured; and heavy-ion collisions at RHIC have opened a window on the deconfinement regime. All these experiments leave legacies of quality, precision, and unsolved mysteries for quarkonium physics, and therefore beg for continuing investigations at BESIII, the LHC, RHIC, FAIR, the Super Flavor and/or Tau–Charm factories, JLab, the ILC, and beyond. The list of newly found conventional states expanded to include hc(1P), χc2(2P), $B_{c}^{+}$, and ηb(1S). In addition, the unexpected and still-fascinating X(3872) has been joined by more than a dozen other charmonium- and bottomonium-like “XYZ” states that appear to lie outside the quark model. Many of these still need experimental confirmation. The plethora of new states unleashed a flood of theoretical investigations into new forms of matter such as quark–gluon hybrids, mesonic molecules, and tetraquarks. Measurements of the spectroscopy, decays, production, and in-medium behavior of $c\bar{c}$, $b\bar{b}$, and $b\bar{c}$ bound states have been shown to validate some theoretical approaches to QCD and highlight lack of quantitative success for others. Lattice QCD has grown from a tool with computational possibilities to an industrial-strength effort now dependent more on insight and innovation than pure computational power. New effective field theories for the description of quarkonium in different regimes have been developed and brought to a high degree of sophistication, thus enabling precise and solid theoretical predictions. Many expected decays and transitions have either been measured with precision or for the first time, but the confusing patterns of decays, both above and below open-flavor thresholds, endure and have deepened. The intriguing details of quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions that have emerged from RHIC have elevated the importance of separating hot- and cold-nuclear-matter effects in quark–gluon plasma studies. This review systematically addresses all these matters and concludes by prioritizing directions for ongoing and future efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Araujo, H., Arce, P., Asai, M., Axen, D., Banerjee, S., Barrand, G., et al. (2003) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 · Cited by 25,106
Sjöstrand, T., Mrenna, S., & Skands, P. (2006) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 · Cited by 8,952
Eidelman, S., Hayes, K. G., Olive, K. A., Aguilar-Benitez, M., Amsler, C., Asner, D., Babu, K. S., Barnett, R. M., Beringer, J., Burchat, P. R., et al. (2004) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.001 · Cited by 6,673
Self-citationNakamura, K. (2010) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7a/075021 · Cited by 5,797
Amsler, C., Doser, M., Antonelli, M., Asner, D. M., Babu, K. S., Baer, H., Band, H. R., Barnett, R. M., Bergren, E., Beringer, J., et al. (2008) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 · Cited by 5,065
Self-citationQCD and resonance physics. theoretical foundations
Shifman, M. A., Vainshtein, A. I., & Zakharov, V. I. (1979) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90022-1 · Cited by 4,701
al, W.-M. Y. E. (2006) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/33/1/001 · Cited by 4,087
New Generation of Parton Distributions with Uncertainties from Global QCD AnalysisPreprint
Pumplin, J., Stump, D. R., Huston, J., et al. (2002) · Cited by 3,045
J/ψ suppression by quark-gluon plasma formation
Matsui, T., & Satz, H. (1986) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91404-8 · Cited by 2,912
Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics
Godfrey, S., & Isgur, N. (1985) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.32.189 · Cited by 2,882
Cited by
An updated review of the new hadron states
Chen, H.-X., Chen, W., Liu, X., Liu, Y.-R., & Zhu, S.-L. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6 · Cited by 594
Nuclear effective field theory: Status and perspectives
Hammer, H.-W., König, S., & van Kolck, U. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025004 · Cited by 477
Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states
Eichmann, G., Sanchis-Alepuz, H., Williams, R., Alkofer, R., & Fischer, C. S. (2016) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.07.001 · Cited by 438
Thermodynamics of strong-interaction matter from lattice QCD
Ding, H.-T., Karsch, F., & Mukherjee, S. (2015) · International Journal of Modern Physics E · doi:10.1142/s0218301315300076 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Brambilla, N., Eidelman, S., Heltsley, B. K., Vogt, R., Bodwin, G. T., Eichten, E., Frawley, A. D., Meyer, A. B., Mitchell, R. E., Papadimitriou, V., Petreczky, P., Petrov, A. A., Robbe, P., Vairo, A., Andronic, A., Arnaldi, R., Artoisenet, P., Bali, G., Bertolin, A., Bettoni, D., Brodzicka, J., Bruno, G. E., Caldwell, A., Catmore, J., Chang, C.-H., Chao, K.-T., Chudakov, E., Cortese, P., Crochet, P., Drutskoy, A., Ellwanger, U., Faccioli, P., Gabareen Mokhtar, A., Garcia i Tormo, X., Hanhart, C., Harris, F. A., Kaplan, D. M., Klein, S. R., Kowalski, H., Lansberg, J.-P., Levichev, E., Lombardo, V., Lourenço, C., Maltoni, F., Mocsy, A., Mussa, R., Navarra, F. S., Negrini, M., Nielsen, M., Olsen, S. L., Pakhlov, P., Pakhlova, G., Peters, K., Polosa, A. D., Qian, W., Qiu, J.-W., Rong, G., Sanchis-Lozano, M. A., Scomparin, E., Senger, P., Simon, F., Stracka, S., Sumino, Y., Voloshin, M., Weiss, C., Wöhri, H. K., & Yuan, C.-Z.
- Venue
- The European Physical Journal C
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1434-6044 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-6052
- OpenAlex
- W2169127494
- Cited by
- 1,755
- References
- 165
- FWCI
- 93.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1534-9
- The paper
- Brambilla, N., Eidelman, S., Heltsley, B. K., Vogt, R., Bodwin, G. T., Eichten, E., Frawley, A. D., Meyer, A. B., Mitchell, R. E., Papadimitriou, V., Petreczky, P., Petrov, A. A., Robbe, P., Vairo, A., Andronic, A., Arnaldi, R., Artoisenet, P., Bali, G., Bertolin, A., . . . Yuan, C.-Z. (2011). Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities. The European Physical Journal C. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1534-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.