Cited by 8Neutrino Physics ResearchParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena

MACRO results on atmospheric neutrino oscillations

Open access
Giacomelli, G., Margiotta, A.·2004·The European Physical Journal C

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1140/epjcd/s2003-03-909-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It seems unlikely that Lorentz violation could be the sole source of neutrino oscillations.

    “Current data support neutrino oscillations that vary as a function of L/E [35, 125], so it seems unlikely that Lorentz violation could be the sole source of neutrino oscillations.”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [125]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]2. G. Giacomelli et al., hep-ex/0211035; hep-ex/0210006; Modern Phys. Lett. A18 (2003)2001; hep-ex/0407023. · arXiv
  2. [3]3. M. Ambrosio et al., Astrop. Phys. 9 (1998)105; 'Status report 2001', hep-ex/0206027. · arXiv
  3. [5]5. M. Ambrosio et al., Phys. Lett. B434 (1998)451; Phys. Lett. B478 (2000)5; G. Giacomelli et al., hep-ph/9901355; hep-ex/0201032. · arXiv
  4. [10]10. Y. Hayato, 'Status of the Super-K and the K2K experiments', HEP EPS Conf., Aachen, (2003).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giacomelli, G., & Margiotta, A.
Affiliations
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (IT)
Venue
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2003-12-18
Volume
33
Issue
S1
Pages
s826-s828
ISSN
  • 1434-6044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-6052
OpenAlex
W3012761237
Cited by
8
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The European Physical Journal C (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Neutrino Physics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
atmospheric neutrino oscillations, MACRO experiment, muon neutrino to tau neutrino oscillation, maximal mixing, neutrino mass-squared difference, muon neutrino flux, muon energy reconstruction, multiple Coulomb scattering, event topology, angular distributions, particle ratios, absolute flux

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review