The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compression ensembles quantify aesthetic complexity and the evolution of visual art
Open accessAbstract
To the human eye, different images appear more or less complex, but capturing this intuition in a single aesthetic measure is considered hard. Here, we propose a computationally simple, transparent method for modeling aesthetic complexity as a multidimensional algorithmic phenomenon, which enables the systematic analysis of large image datasets. The approach captures visual family resemblance via a multitude of image transformations and subsequent compressions, yielding explainable embeddings. It aligns well with human judgments of visual complexity, and performs well in authorship and style recognition tasks. Showcasing the functionality, we apply the method to 125,000 artworks, recovering trends and revealing new insights regarding historical art, artistic careers over centuries, and emerging aesthetics in a contemporary NFT art market. Our approach, here applied to images but applicable more broadly, provides a new perspective to quantitative aesthetics, connoisseurship, multidimensional meaning spaces, and the study of cultural complexity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ensuring that AI models, such as LLMs, reflect the beliefs and values of a given community requires mechanisms for societal decision-making about what knowledge goes into the models 181 .”
From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [181]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N., & Großberger, L. (2018) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00861 · Cited by 9,826
The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition
Tomasello, M. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjsf4jc · Cited by 6,368
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 · Cited by 5,933
Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study
Opitz, D., & Maclin, R. (1999) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.614 · Cited by 2,953
Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper
The “Five Graces Group”, Beckner, C., Blythe, R. A., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J. H., Ke, J., Larsen‐Freeman, D., et al. (2009) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x · Cited by 1,235
Cilibrasi, R., & Vitanyi, P. M. B. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.844059 · Cited by 1,198
Gärdenfors, P. (2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2076.001.0001 · Cited by 1,139
Li, M., Chen, D., Li, X., Ma, B., & Vitanyi, P. M. B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2004.838101 · Cited by 1,069
Algorithmic Information Theory
Chaitin, G. J. (1977) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/rd.214.0350 · Cited by 982
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bense M (1969) Einführung in Die Informationstheoretische Ästhetik Grundlegung Und Anwendung in Der Texttheorie. Rowolt Verlag, Reinbeks
- Galanter P (2003) What is generative art? Complexity theory as a context for art theory. In: GA2003–6th generative art conference. Citeseer
- Elgammal A, Liu B, Kim D, Elhoseiny M, Mazzone M (2018) The shape of art history in the eyes of the machine. In: 32nd AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI 2018. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp 2183–2191
- Rigau J, Feixas M, Sbert M (2007) Conceptualizing Birkhoff’s aesthetic measure using Shannon entropy and Kolmogorov complexity. In: Proceedings of the third eurographics conference on computational aesthetics in graphics, visualization and imaging. Computational Aesthetics’07. Eurographics Assoc., Goslar, pp 105–112
- Han SJ, Kelly P, Winters J, Kemp C (2021) Chinese characters have increased in visual complexity over three millennia. PsyArXiv preprint
- Taylor R (2004) Pollock, Mondrian and the nature: recent scientific investigations. Chaos Complex Letters 1(3):265–277
- Vasari G, Bondanella JC, Bondanella P (1998) The lives of the artists. Oxford University Press, Oxford
- Cassirer E (1927) Das Symbolproblem Und Seine Stellung Im System der Philosophie. Z Ästhet Allg Kunstwiss 21:295–322
- Srinivasa Desikan B, Evans J (2022) Aggregate, integrate and align to embed everything: a multi-modal framework for measuring cultural dynamics. In: Cultures in AI/AI in culture. A NeurIPS 2022 workshop
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brinkmann, L., Baumann, F., Bonnefon, J.-F., Derex, M., Müller, T. F., Nussberger, A.-M., Czaplicka, A., Acerbi, A., Griffiths, T. L., Henrich, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01742-2 · Cited by 132
Karjus, A. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04503-w · Cited by 99
Self-citationDesikan, B. S., Shimao, H., & Miton, H. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24091175 · Cited by 13
Quantifying the global film festival circuit: Networks, diversity, and public value creation
Zemaityte, V., Karjus, A., Rohn, U., Schich, M., & Ibrus, I. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297404 · Cited by 13
Self-citationConwell, C., Graham, D., Boccagno, C. E., & Vessel, E. A. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2306025121 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Karjus, A., Canet Solà, M., Ohm, T., Ahnert, S. E., & Schich, M.
- Affiliations
- Tallinn University (EE)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Karjus, Andres
- Venue
- EPJ Data Science
- Published
- 2023-06-14
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2193-1127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4380685139
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- EPJ Data Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (810961)
- Royal Society
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- image compression, algorithmic complexity, visual arts, art style recognition, authorship attribution, image transformation, NFT art, art history, artistic career, cultural complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
