The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lectures on Non-Perturbative Canonical Gravity
Abstract
Notes prepared in Collaboration with Ranjeet S Tate It is now generally recognized that perturbative field theoretical methods that have been highly successful in the quantum description of non-gravitational interactions cannot be used as a means of constructing a quantum theory of gravity. The primary aim of the book is to present an up- to-date account of a non-perturbative, canonical quantization program for gravity. Many of the technical results obtained in the process are of interest also to differential geometry, classical general relativity and QCD. The program as a whole was highlighted in virtually every major conference in gravitational physics over the past three years.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Now, in 2+1 dimensions, using the loop representation one can recast the final description in a purely combinatorial fashion (at least in the so-called 'time-like sector' of the theory).”
From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“In 2 + 1 dimensions with Λ = 0, this approach is closely related to the first order formalism of Section 2.3, but takes as its fundamental observables the loop variables T0[γ] and T1[γ] of Equation (55).”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“More precisely, loop quantum gravity starts with a Hamiltonian formulation of the first order formalism, with constraints, written in analogy to the (3 + 1)-dimensional case [26], that take the form 63”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“For the torus universe, this “loop transform” can be obtained explicitly [26, 29, 192], and written as a simple integral transform.”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“The loop representation is complicated by the existence of Mandelstam identities [190] among holonomies of loops, but for the case of the torus universe, a complete, explicit description of the states is again possible [26, 29].”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“In standard quantum cosmology the constraint equation is ˆ c 2 √ | ˆ p | ξ ( c ) = 0 with a solution √ | ˆ p | ξ ( c ) = δ ( c ) which is not unique.”
From Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cosmology (2001) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“This is exactly what one obtains from the classical constraint H (E) = -6 c 2 √ | p | in standard quantum cosmology [17] by quantizing 3ˆ c = -iγl 2 P d / d p . In our framework, however, this is only an approximate equation valid for large scale factors.”
From Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cosmology (2001) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“The Poisson bracket in (3) preserves the space of cylindrical functions and the Dirac delta is absorbed completely by the integrations involved in the definitions of the holonomy and flux. This fact was pointed out for the first time in [1, 8].”
From Uniqueness of Diffeomorphism Invariant States on Holonomy–Flux Algebras (2006) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 872
The non-perturbative canonical quantization of the N = 1 supergravity
Sano, T., & Shiraishi, J. (1993) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90442-r · Cited by 40
Chiou, D.-W. (2014) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271815300050 · Cited by 41
Hamiltonian renormalisation I: derivation from Osterwalder–Schrader reconstruction
Lang, T., Liegener, K., & Thiemann, T. (2018) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aaec56 · Cited by 47
Loop space representation of quantum fermions and gravity
Morales-Técotl, H. A., & Rovelli, C. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00343-q · Cited by 39
Dittrich, B., & Tambornino, J. (2007) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 39
Interacting vector fields in relativity without relativity
Anderson, E. J., & Barbour, J. (2002) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/12/309 · Cited by 38
Seeking the loop quantum gravity Barbero-Immirzi parameter and field in 4D, N=1 supergravity
Gates, S. J., Jr., Ketov, S. V., & Yunes, N. (2009) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.065003 · Cited by 38
A Loop Representation for the Quantum Maxwell Field
Ashtekar, A., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (1992) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 38
Self-citationUniversality of affine formulation in general relativity
Kijowski, J., & Werpachowski, R. (2007) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/s0034-4877(07)80001-2 · Cited by 37
Pourhassan, B., & Faizal, M. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4665-4 · Cited by 36
Chiral description of massive gravity
Alexandrov, S. Y., Krasnov, K. V., & Simone Speziale, D. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)068 · Cited by 36
Standard Cosmology and Alternatives: A Critical Appraisal
Narlikar, J. V., & Padmanabhan, Τ. (2001) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.211 · Cited by 36
A new spin on the hole argument
Rickles, D. P. (2005) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.10.003 · Cited by 36
Integrable Classical and Quantum Gravity
Nicolai, H., Korotkin, D. A., & Samtleben, H. (1997) · NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1801-7_9 · Cited by 36
The solution space of 2 + 1 gravity on in Witten's connection formulation
Louko, J., & Marolf, D. M. (1994) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/2/005 · Cited by 35
New Constraints for Canonical General RelativityPreprint
Reisenberger, M. (1995) · Cited by 38
SU( N ) Quantum Yang–Mills theory in two dimensions: A complete solution
Ashtekar, A., Lewandowski, J., Marolf, D., Mourão, J., & Thiemann, T. (1997) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.532146 · Cited by 35
Self-citationRendall, A. D. (1993) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/10/11/009 · Cited by 35
Perturbed thermodynamics and thermodynamic geometry of a static black hole in f(R) gravity
Upadhyay, S., Soroushfar, S., & Saffari, R. (2021) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732321502126 · Cited by 40
Surface terms, asymptotics and thermodynamics of the Holst action
Corichi, A., & Wilson-Ewing, E. (2010) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/20/205015 · Cited by 37
Wilson loops in four-dimensional quantum gravity
Modanese, G. (1994) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.6534 · Cited by 39
Goldberg, J. N., Lewandowski, J., & Stornaiolo, C. (1992) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02100867 · Cited by 34
Complex Ashtekar variables and reality conditions for Holst’s actionPreprint
Wieland, W. (2016) · Cited by 39
Spin Foam Models with Finite Groups
Bähr, B., Dittrich, B., & Ryan, J. P. (2013) · Journal of Gravity · doi:10.1155/2013/549824 · Cited by 41
A gauge-theoretic approach to gravity
Krasnov, K. V. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2011.0638 · Cited by 33
Path integral for the Hilbert-Palatini and Ashtekar gravity
Alexandrov, S. Y., & Vassilevich, D. (1998) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.124029 · Cited by 33
Daum, J.-E., & Reuter, M. (2009) · Advanced Science Letters · doi:10.1166/asl.2009.1033 · Cited by 35
Crowther, K., & Linnemann, N. (2017) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axx052 · Cited by 33
Gauge transformation in Einstein–Yang–Mills theories
Pons, J. M., Salisbury, D., & Shepley, L. C. (2000) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.533425 · Cited by 33
STRONG-COUPLED RELATIVITY WITHOUT RELATIVITYPreprint
Anderson, E. J. (2002) · Cited by 33
Quantum Geometry and Gravity: Recent AdvancesPreprint
Ashtekar, A. (2001) · Cited by 36
Self-citationGroup field theory in dimension 4 − ϵ
Carrozza, S. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.065023 · Cited by 39
Universality and symmetry breaking in conformally reduced quantum gravity
Bonanno, A. M., & Guarnieri, F. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.105027 · Cited by 43
Variations on the seventh route to relativity
Anderson, E. J. (2003) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.104001 · Cited by 47
Just How Radical is Hyperplane Dependence?
Fleming, G. N. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8656-6_2 · Cited by 33
Canonical and quantum FRW cosmological solutions in M-theory
Cavaglià, M., & Moniz, P. V. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/1/307 · Cited by 31
Abbas, G., & Ali, R. H. (2023) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11580-1 · Cited by 32
Space-time covariant form of Ashtekar’s constraints
Esposito, G. V. M., J., G. G. S., & Stornaiolo, C. (1995) · Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B · doi:10.1007/bf02724605 · Cited by 31
Consequences of thermal fluctuations of well-known black holes in modified gravity
Jawad, A. (2020) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab9ad5 · Cited by 31
3 New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity in all Dimensions IV. Matter CouplingPreprint
Bodendorfer, N., Thiemann, T., & Thurn, A. (2013) · Cited by 31
Time, Structure and Evolution in Cosmology
Smolin, L. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0111-3_10 · Cited by 30
Semiclassical geons at particle accelerators
Olmo, G. J., & Rubiera-García, D. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/010 · Cited by 30
Quantum field theory and its symmetry reduction
Engle, J. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/007 · Cited by 30
Constructing Hamiltonian quantum theories from path integrals in a diffeomorphism-invariant context
Ashtekar, A., Marolf, D. M., Mourão, J. M., & Thiemann, T. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/23/310 · Cited by 39
Self-citationAsymptotically anti-de Sitter wormholes
Barceló, C., Garay, L. J., González-Dı́az, P. F., & Marugán, G. A. M. (1996) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.3162 · Cited by 30
Quantum Gravity: A Primer for PhilosophersPreprint
Rickles, D. P. (2008) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · doi:10.4324/9781315612676-10 · Cited by 30
Invariance Principles and Extended Gravity: Theory and Probes
Capozzıello, S., & Laurentis, M. D. (2011) · Cited by 35
Logarithmic correction of the BTZ black hole and adaptive model of graphene
Pourhassan, B., Faizal, M., & Ketabi, S. A. (2018) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271818501183 · Cited by 29
Chiral Vacuum Fluctuations in Quantum Gravity
Magueijo, J., & Benincasa, D. M. T. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.121302 · Cited by 32
Canonical quantum supergravity in three dimensions
Matschull, H.-J., & Nicolai, H. (1994) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90464-2 · Cited by 28
Relational particle models: II. Use as toy models for quantum geometrodynamics
Anderson, E. J. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/7/017 · Cited by 37
Carlo Rovelli, C. (2006) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.2399564 · Cited by 29
Ashtekar, A. (2000) · Astrophysics and space science library · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4050-8_3 · Cited by 39
Self-citationRefined algebraic quantization in the oscillator representation of SL(2, ℝ)
Louko, J., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (2000) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9907004 · Cited by 33
Loop Representations for 2+1 Gravity on a Torus
Marolf, D. M. (1993) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 29
On the nature of spin, inertia and gravity of a moving canonical particlePreprint
Krasnoholovets, V. (2001) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0103110 · Cited by 29
Beautiful Gauge Field Equations in Clifforms
Mielke, E. W. (2001) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1003787428183 · Cited by 27
Towards a C-function in 4D quantum gravity
Becker, D., & Reuter, M. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2015)065 · Cited by 33
Laws of black hole mechanics from the Holst action
Chatterjee, A., & Ghosh, A. (2009) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.064036 · Cited by 27
Group theoretical quantization of isotropic loop cosmology
Livine, E. R., & Martín-Benito, M. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.124052 · Cited by 25
Geometric inequivalence of metric and Palatini formulations of General Relativity
Bejarano, C., Delhom, A., Jiménez-Cano, A., Olmo, G. J., & Rubiera-García, D. (2020) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135275 · Cited by 32
Constraint propagation in the family of ADM systems
Yoneda, G., & Shinkai, H.-A. (2001) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.124019 · Cited by 27
Degenerate metric phase boundaries
Bengtsson, I., & Ted Jacobson, A. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/11/011 · Cited by 27
Hyperbolic formulations and numerical relativity: experiments using Ashtekar's connection variables
Shinkai, H.-A., & Yoneda, G. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/23/302 · Cited by 27
Gravitational Dynamics—A Novel Shift in the Hamiltonian Paradigm
Ashtekar, A., & Varadarajan, M. (2021) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe7010013 · Cited by 31
Self-citationJercher, A. F., Oriti, D., & Pithis, A. G. A. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/050 · Cited by 33
Twisted covariant noncommutative self-dual gravity
Estrada-Jiménez, S., García‐Compeán, H., Obregón, O., & Ramírez, C. (2008) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.124008 · Cited by 26
SUPERSPACE DYNAMICS AND PERTURBATIONS AROUND “EMPTINESS”
Soo, C., & Chang, L. N. (1994) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s021827189400068x · Cited by 26
Symmetric Hyperbolic System in the Ashtekar Formulation
Yoneda, G., & Shinkai, H.-A. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.263 · Cited by 26
Cosmology as a problem in critical phenomena
Smolin, L. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/bfb0103573 · Cited by 30
Finite diffeomorphism-invariant observables in quantum gravity
Smolin, L. (1994) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.4028 · Cited by 28
Dirac coupling in gravity with the torsion potential
Hammond, R. T. (1995) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/12/1/022 · Cited by 26
The Structure of Scientific Theory Change: Models versus Privileged Formulations*
Mattingly, J. M. (2005) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/432428 · Cited by 25
Inflationary tensor fluctuations, as viewed by Ashtekar variables and their generalizations
Bethke, L. B., & Magueijo, J. (2011) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.024014 · Cited by 26
BRST cohomology and invariants of four-dimensional gravity in Ashtekar variables
Chang, L. N., & Soo, C. (1992) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.4257 · Cited by 23
Self-dual gravity with topological terms
Montesinos, M. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/10/303 · Cited by 27
Quantum fluctuations from thermal fluctuations in Jacobson formalism
Faizal, M., Ashour, A., Alcheikh, M., Alasfar, L., Alsaleh, S. M., & Mahroussah, A. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5194-x · Cited by 25
Constraint algebra in Smolin’s G→0 limit of 4D Euclidean gravity
Varadarajan, M. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.106007 · Cited by 26
A groupoid approach to spaces of generalized connections
Velhinho, J. M. (2002) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/s0393-0440(01)00051-1 · Cited by 25
Gravitational statistical mechanics: a model
Major, S., & Setter, K. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/23/309 · Cited by 23
Einstein-Cartan gravity, Asymptotic Safety, and the running Immirzi parameterPreprint
Daum, J. E., & Reuter, M. (2016) · Cited by 31
New loop representations for (2+1) gravityPreprint
Ashtekar, A., & Loll, R. (1994) · Cited by 24
Self-citationBeyond the Friedmann—Lemaître—Robertson—Walker Big Bang Singularity
Stoica, C. (2012) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/58/4/28 · Cited by 24
Background independent quantizations—the scalar field: II
Kamiński, W., Lewandowski, J., & Okołów, A. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/18/005 · Cited by 28
Classical and quantum aspects of electric-magnetic duality rotations in curved spacetimes
Agulló, I., del Río, A., & Navarro-Salas, J. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.125001 · Cited by 26
Einstein’s equations and the chiral model
Husain, V. (1996) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.4327 · Cited by 27
Soo, C. (1995) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.3484 · Cited by 24
Yoneda, G., & Shinkai, H.-A. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/3/307 · Cited by 24
Chiral fermions coupled to chiral gravity
Mielke, E. W., Macías, A., & Morales-Técotl, H. A. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(96)00218-6 · Cited by 23
Gauge group and reality conditions in Ashtekar’s complex formulation of canonical gravity
Pons, J. M., Salisbury, D., & Shepley, L. C. (2000) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.064026 · Cited by 24
Symmetry, Structure, and Spacetime
Rickles, D. P. (2007) · Cited by 24
Canonical Quantum Gravity and the Problem of TimePreprint
Isham, C. (1992) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9210011 · Cited by 641
Brügmann, B. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-58339-4_20 · Cited by 30
Conformal boundary conditions, loop gravity and the continuum
Wieland, W. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2018)089 · Cited by 25
Quantum work and information geometry of a quantum Myers-Perry black hole
Pourhassan, B., Wani, S. S., Soroushfar, S., & Faizal, M. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2021)027 · Cited by 23
Reality conditions for Ashtekar gravity from Lorentz-covariant formulation
Alexandrov, S. Y. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/6/002 · Cited by 26
Quantum aspects of black hole entropy
Majumdar, P. (2000) · Pramana · doi:10.1007/s12043-000-0163-5 · Cited by 22
Phase space coordinates and the Hamiltonian constraint of Regge calculus
Mäkelä, J. (1994) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.2882 · Cited by 24
The Conditional Probability Interpretation of the Hamiltonian ConstraintPreprint
Dolby, C. E. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/0406034 · Cited by 23
The ’tetrad only’ theory space: Nonperturbative renormalization flow and asymptotic safetyPreprint
Harst, U., & Reuter, M. (2016) · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashtekar, A.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ashtekar, Abhay
- ORCID
- Ashtekar, Abhay
- Venue
- Advanced Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology
- Publisher
- WORLD SCIENTIFIC
- Published
- 1991-07
- ISSN
- 1793-1312 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.1142/1321
- OpenAlex
- W1673177227
- Cited by
- 872
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 14.99
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced series in astrophysics and cosmology (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- quantum gravity, canonical gravity, general relativity, quantum field theory of gravity, differential geometry, classical general relativity, QCD
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
