The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Qualitative Data Analysis
Abstract
Qualitative data analysis is challenging both from a conceptual point of view as well as from the practical techniques required to produce useful results. In fact the problem begins with establishing how data is perceived and what are regarded as the most appropriate sources of data. These issues have to be embedded in any comprehensive understanding of the research question and the researcher needs to clarify for himself or herself their attitude toward a holistic approach such as Hermeneutics relative to a more “fractured” approach such as Content Analysis. In either case the objective of developing theory is of paramount importance to the academic researcher.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., & Donovan, J. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00064-3 · Cited by 921
Computer Conferencing and Content Analysis
Henri, F. (1992) · Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77684-7_8 · Cited by 769
Priya, A. (2021) · Sociological Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0038022920970318 · Cited by 617
Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2008) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20195 · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Venue
- Research Methods
- Publisher
- WORLD SCIENTIFIC
- Published
- 2022-05
- Pages
- 113-122
- OpenAlex
- W3152099341
- Cited by
- 1,655
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 337.34
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative Data Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/9789811256943_0011
- The paper
- Qualitative Data Analysis. (2022). Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811256943_0011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
