Cited by 497Career Development and DiversityEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessScience Education and Perceptions

A comparative study of the self‐efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers

Zeldin, Amy L., Britner, Shari L., Pajares, Frank·2008·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the personal stories of men who selected careers in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) to better understand the ways in which their self‐efficacy beliefs were created and subsequently influenced their academic and career choices. Analysis of 10 narratives revealed that mastery experience was the primary source of the men's self‐efficacy beliefs. These results are compared to those from Zeldin and Pajares' earlier study involving women in STEM careers. For women, social persuasions and vicarious experiences were the primary sources of self‐efficacy beliefs. Together, these findings suggest that different sources are predominant in the creation and development of the self‐efficacy beliefs of men and women who pursue STEM careers. The self‐efficacy beliefs of men in these male‐dominated domains are created primarily as a result of the interpretations they make of their ongoing achievements and successes. Women, on the other hand, rely on relational episodes in their lives to create and buttress the confidence that they can succeed in male‐dominated domains. Findings were consistent with the theoretical tenets of A. Bandura's social cognitive theory. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 45: 1036–1058, 2008

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.20195

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Bradley University (US)
Corresponding author
Britner, Shari L.
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-12
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
1036-1058
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W2008389660
Cited by
497
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
20.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
Keywords
self-efficacy, STEM careers, gender differences, mastery experiences, social persuasion, vicarious experience, social cognitive theory, career choice, academic choice, women in STEM, personal narrative

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review