Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TRANSCRIPTOME AND GENOME CONSERVATION OF ALTERNATIVE SPLICING EVENTS IN HUMANS AND MICE

SUGNET, C.W., KENT, W.J., ARES, M., HAUSSLER, D.·2003·Biocomputing 2004

Abstract

Combining mRNA and EST data in splicing graphs with whole genome alignments, we discover alternative splicing events that are conserved in both human and mouse transcriptomes. 1,964 of 19,156 (10%) loci examined contain one or more such alternative splicing events, with 2,698 total events. These events represent a lower bound on the amount of alternative splicing in the human genome. Also, as these alternative splicing events are conserved between the human and mouse transcriptomes they should be enriched for functionally significant alternative splicing events, free from much of the noise found in the EST libraries. Further classification of these alternative splicing events reveals that 1,037 (38.4%) are due to exon skipping, 497 (18.4%) are due to alternative 3' splice sites, 214 (7.9%) are due to alternative 5' splice sites, 75 (2.8%) are due to intron retention and the other 875 (32.4%) are due to other, more complicated, alternative splicing events. In addition, genomic sequences nearby these alternative splicing events display increased sequence conservation. Both the alternatively spliced exons and the proximal intron show increased levels of genomic conservation relative to constitutively spliced exons. For exon skipping events both intron regions flanking the exon are conserved while for alternative 5' and 3' splicing events the conservation is greater near the alternative splice site.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/9789812704856_0007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
SUGNET, C. W., KENT, W. J., ARES, M., & HAUSSLER, D.
Venue
Biocomputing 2004
Published
2003-12
Pages
66-77
OpenAlex
W1963918734
Cited by
222
References
0
FWCI
40.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TRANSCRIPTOME AND GENOME CONSERVATION OF ALTERNATIVE SPLICING EVENTS IN HUMANS AND MICE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/9789812704856_0007
The paper
SUGNET, C. W., KENT, W. J., ARES, M., & HAUSSLER, D. (2003). TRANSCRIPTOME AND GENOME CONSERVATION OF ALTERNATIVE SPLICING EVENTS IN HUMANS AND MICE. Biocomputing 2004. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812704856_0007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.