The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TRANSCRIPTOME AND GENOME CONSERVATION OF ALTERNATIVE SPLICING EVENTS IN HUMANS AND MICE
Abstract
Combining mRNA and EST data in splicing graphs with whole genome alignments, we discover alternative splicing events that are conserved in both human and mouse transcriptomes. 1,964 of 19,156 (10%) loci examined contain one or more such alternative splicing events, with 2,698 total events. These events represent a lower bound on the amount of alternative splicing in the human genome. Also, as these alternative splicing events are conserved between the human and mouse transcriptomes they should be enriched for functionally significant alternative splicing events, free from much of the noise found in the EST libraries. Further classification of these alternative splicing events reveals that 1,037 (38.4%) are due to exon skipping, 497 (18.4%) are due to alternative 3' splice sites, 214 (7.9%) are due to alternative 5' splice sites, 75 (2.8%) are due to intron retention and the other 875 (32.4%) are due to other, more complicated, alternative splicing events. In addition, genomic sequences nearby these alternative splicing events display increased sequence conservation. Both the alternatively spliced exons and the proximal intron show increased levels of genomic conservation relative to constitutively spliced exons. For exon skipping events both intron regions flanking the exon are conserved while for alternative 5' and 3' splicing events the conservation is greater near the alternative splice site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes
Siepel, A., Bejerano, G., Pedersen, J. S., Hinrichs, A. S., Hou, M., Rosenbloom, K., Clawson, H., Spieth, J., Hillier, L. W., Richards, S., et al. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3715005 · Cited by 3,971
Self-citationAlternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function
Keren, H., Lev-Maor, G., & Ast, G. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2776 · Cited by 1,082
Context-dependent control of alternative splicing by RNA-binding proteins
Fu, X.-D., & Ares, M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3778 · Cited by 1,044
Self-citationMarquez, Y., Brown, J. W. S., Simpson, C., Barta, A., & Kalyna, M. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.134106.111 · Cited by 802
Variation in alternative splicing across human tissues
Yeo, G., Holste, D., Kreiman, G., & Burge, C. B. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r74 · Cited by 584
Metadata
- Authors
- SUGNET, C. W., KENT, W. J., ARES, M., & HAUSSLER, D.
- Venue
- Biocomputing 2004
- Publisher
- WORLD SCIENTIFIC
- Published
- 2003-12
- Pages
- 66-77
- OpenAlex
- W1963918734
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TRANSCRIPTOME AND GENOME CONSERVATION OF ALTERNATIVE SPLICING EVENTS IN HUMANS AND MICE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/9789812704856_0007
- The paper
- SUGNET, C. W., KENT, W. J., ARES, M., & HAUSSLER, D. (2003). TRANSCRIPTOME AND GENOME CONSERVATION OF ALTERNATIVE SPLICING EVENTS IN HUMANS AND MICE. Biocomputing 2004. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812704856_0007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.