Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 692

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem

Rabin, Matihew·2013·World Scientific Handbook in Financial Economics Series
DOI 10.1142/9789814417358_0013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The following sections are included:INTRODUCTIONSOME CALIBRATIONS BASED ON A THEOREMDISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONAPPENDIX: THE THEOREM AND A COROLLARYREFERENCES

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/9789814417358_0013

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 692

Metadata

Authors
Rabin, M.
Venue
World Scientific Handbook in Financial Economics Series
Publisher
WORLD SCIENTIFIC
Published
2013-07
Pages
241-252
ISSN
2010-1732 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1142/9789814417358_0013
OpenAlex
W2124876524
Cited by
692
References
4
FWCI
46.79
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/9789814417358_0013
The paper
Rabin, M. (2013). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. World Scientific Handbook in Financial Economics Series. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.