Cited by 98Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics

Discrete Gauge Theory: From Lattices to TQFT

Oeckl, Robert·2005·IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/p404

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BF amplitudes are independent of the regulating triangulation, and with suitable regularization of bubble divergences the BF partition function is topologically invariant and discretization independent.

    “using this graphical notation one can easily prove the discretization independence of the BF amplitudes.”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [286]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oeckl, R.
Affiliations
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Corresponding author
Oeckl, Robert
Venue
IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks
Published
2005-08
OpenAlex
W4242547918
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Keywords
discrete gauge theory, lattice gauge theory, gauge fields, discrete symmetries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review