Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

OPINION EVOLUTION IN CLOSED COMMUNITY

Open access
SZNAJD-WERON, KATARZYNA, SZNAJD, JÓZEF·2000·International Journal of Modern Physics C
DOI 10.1142/s0129183100000936
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A simple Ising spin model which can describe a mechanism of making a decision in a closed community is proposed. It is shown via standard Monte Carlo simulations that very simple rules lead to rather complicated dynamics and to a power law in the decision time distribution. It is found that a closed community has to evolve either to a dictatorship or a stalemate state (inability to take any common decision). A common decision can be taken in a "democratic way" only by an open community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0129183100000936

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 1,300

Metadata

Authors
SZNAJD-WERON, K., & SZNAJD, J.
Venue
International Journal of Modern Physics C
Publisher
World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
Published
2000-09
Volume
11
Issue
06
Pages
1157-1165
ISSN
  • 0129-1831 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6586
DOI
10.1142/s0129183100000936
OpenAlex
W1556269759
Cited by
1,300
References
6
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OPINION EVOLUTION IN CLOSED COMMUNITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0129183100000936
The paper
SZNAJD-WERON, K., & SZNAJD, J. (2000). OPINION EVOLUTION IN CLOSED COMMUNITY. International Journal of Modern Physics C. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0129183100000936

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.