The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MODEL REDUCTION FOR FLUIDS, USING BALANCED PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION
Abstract
Many of the tools of dynamical systems and control theory have gone largely unused for fluids, because the governing equations are so dynamically complex, both high-dimensional and nonlinear. Model reduction involves finding low-dimensional models that approximate the full high-dimensional dynamics. This paper compares three different methods of model reduction: proper orthogonal decomposition (POD), balanced truncation, and a method called balanced POD. Balanced truncation produces better reduced-order models than POD, but is not computationally tractable for very large systems. Balanced POD is a tractable method for computing approximate balanced truncations, that has computational cost similar to that of POD. The method presented here is a variation of existing methods using empirical Gramians, and the main contributions of the present paper are a version of the method of snapshots that allows one to compute balancing transformations directly, without separate reduction of the Gramians; and an output projection method, which allows tractable computation even when the number of outputs is large. The output projection method requires minimal additional computation, and has a priori error bounds that can guide the choice of rank of the projection. Connections between POD and balanced truncation are also illuminated: in particular, balanced truncation may be viewed as POD of a particular dataset, using the observability Gramian as an inner product. The three methods are illustrated on a numerical example, the linearized flow in a plane channel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation
Chaturantabut, S., & Sorensen, D. C. (2010) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/090766498 · Cited by 1,925
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Closed-Loop Turbulence Control: Progress and Challenges
Brunton, S. L., & Noack, B. R. (2015) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.4031175 · Cited by 623
(2018) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2018.2810460 · Cited by 518
Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01719 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- ROWLEY, C. W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 997-1013
- ISSN
- 0218-1274 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6551
- OpenAlex
- W2059316647
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MODEL REDUCTION FOR FLUIDS, USING BALANCED PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0218127405012429
- The paper
- ROWLEY, C. W. (2005). MODEL REDUCTION FOR FLUIDS, USING BALANCED PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218127405012429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.