Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,189

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ESTIMATORS FOR LONG-RANGE DEPENDENCE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

TAQQU, MURAD S., TEVEROVSKY, VADIM, WILLINGER, WALTER·1995·Fractals

Abstract

Various methods for estimating the self-similarity parameter and/or the intensity of long-range dependence in a time series are available. Some are more reliable than others. To discover the ones that work best, we apply the different methods to simulated sequences of fractional Gaussian noise and fractional ARIMA (0, d, 0). We also provide here a theoretical justification for the method of residuals of regression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218348x95000692

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,189

Metadata

Authors
TAQQU, M. S., TEVEROVSKY, V., & WILLINGER, W.
Venue
Fractals
Published
1995-12
Volume
03
Issue
04
Pages
785-798
ISSN
  • 0218-348X (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6543
OpenAlex
W2165773639
Cited by
1,189
References
0
FWCI
30.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESTIMATORS FOR LONG-RANGE DEPENDENCE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0218348x95000692
The paper
TAQQU, M. S., TEVEROVSKY, V., & WILLINGER, W. (1995). ESTIMATORS FOR LONG-RANGE DEPENDENCE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY. Fractals. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218348x95000692

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.