Cited by 727Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasECG Monitoring and Analysis

Advances in heart rate variability signal analysis: Joint position statement by the e-Cardiology ESC Working Group and the European Heart Rhythm Association co-endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society

Open access
Sassi, Roberto, Cerutti, Sergio, Lombardi, Federico, Malik, Marek, Huikuri, Heikki V., Peng, Chung-Kang, Schmidt, Georg, Yamamoto, Yoshiharu +8 more·2015·Europace

Abstract

Following the publication of the Task Force document on heart rate variability (HRV) in 1996, a number of articles have been published to describe new HRV methodologies and their application in different physiological and clinical studies. This document presents a critical review of the new methods. A particular attention has been paid to methodologies that have not been reported in the 1996 standardization document but have been more recently tested in sufficiently sized populations. The following methods were considered: Long-range correlation and fractal analysis; Short-term complexity; Entropy and regularity; and Nonlinear dynamical systems and chaotic behaviour. For each of these methods, technical aspects, clinical achievements, and suggestions for clinical application were reviewed. While the novel approaches have contributed in the technical understanding of the signal character of HRV, their success in developing new clinical tools, such as those for the identification of high-risk patients, has been rather limited. Available results obtained in selected populations of patients by specialized laboratories are nevertheless of interest but new prospective studies are needed. The investigation of new parameters, descriptive of the complex regulation mechanisms of heart rate, has to be encouraged because not all information in the HRV signal is captured by traditional methods. The new technologies thus could provide after proper validation, additional physiological, and clinical meaning. Multidisciplinary dialogue and specialized courses in the combination of clinical cardiology and complex signal processing methods seem warranted for further advances in studies of cardiac oscillations and in the understanding normal and abnormal cardiac control processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euv015

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The new HRV analyses methods that emerged since the Task Force did not bring any additional information regarding physiological underpinnings of HRV, and therefore no additional information for vagal tone.

    “Finally, a critical review of the new HRV analyses methods that emerged since the Task Force regarding HRV (Malik, 1996) was realized by Sassi et al. (2015), and the conclusion was that the new methods did not bring any additional information regarding physiological underpinnings of HRV, and therefore no additional information for vagal tone.”

    From Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research – Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting (2017) · cites this paper as Sassi et al., 2015

    The Conclusions (p. 9) say that new parameters can provide different information about the complexity of physiological mechanisms underlying HRV, contrary to the claim that they brought no additional physiological information. Suggestions for clinical use (p. 9) say the methods have provided more information about signal complexity than about parasympathetic control; they do not conclude that the methods provide no information about vagal control. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies have demonstrated the correlation of depressed HRV with risk of mortality including cardiovascular death but not with SCD.

    “Studies have demonstrated the correlation of depressed HRV with risk of mortality including cardiovascular death but not with SCD (Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, 1996;Sassi et al., 2015;Wellens et al., 2014).”

    From 2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry (2017) · cites this paper as Sassi et al., 2015

    The paper reports associations with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, but it contradicts the claim’s exclusion of sudden cardiac death. In “Subjects without evidence of heart disease” (p. 9), it reports that a DFA HRV measure was an independent predictor of sudden cardiac death. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The utility of non-linear indices has still to be demonstrated to predict psychophysiological phenomena.

    “However, some caution is still required regarding non-linear indices and their utility has still to be demonstrated to predict psychophysiological phenomena (Sassi et al., 2015).”

    From Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research – Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting (2017) · cites this paper as Sassi et al., 2015

    The Conclusions (p. 9) call for further validation to establish the clinical predictive value of novel HRV methods, and Suggestions for clinical use (p. 9) favor traditional measures for assessing autonomic physiology. These passages support caution about nonlinear indices, but they do not specifically assess their ability to predict psychophysiological phenomena. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If novel HRV methods are used, researchers should follow recent recommendations and always present the new HRV measures together with more traditional measures of HRV.

    “In addition, if novel HRV methods are used, researchers should follow recent recommendations and always present the new HRV measures together to more traditional measures of HRV (Sassi et al., 2015).”

    From Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research – Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting (2017) · cites this paper as Sassi et al., 2015

    In “Suggestions for clinical use” (p. 9), the paper suggests using novel HRV techniques in conjunction with traditional ones. That supports presenting both kinds of measures, but the paper frames this as a suggestion, not an instruction to always do so. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]42. Cerutti S, Baselli G, Bianchi AM, Mainardi LT, Signorini MG, Malliani A. Cardiovascular variability signals: from signal processing to modeling complex physiological interactions. Automedica 1994; 16 :45-69.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sassi, R., Cerutti, S., Lombardi, F., Malik, M., Huikuri, H. V., Peng, C.-K., Schmidt, G., Yamamoto, Y., Reviewers:, D., Gorenek, B., Lip, G. Y. H., Grassi, G., Kudaiberdieva, G., Fisher, J. P., Zabel, M., & Macfadyen, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • University of London (GB)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Europace
Published
2015-07-14
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1341-1353
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W1929108078
Cited by
727
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 4
FWCI
44.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation (PG/13/54/30358, PG/12/77/29857)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
heart rate variability, long-range correlations, fractal analysis, entropy (information theory), nonlinear dynamical systems, chaotic dynamics, heart rate regulation, cardiac oscillations, high-risk patient identification
MeSH terms
Asia, Autonomic Nervous System, Cardiology, Electrocardiography, Europe, Heart Rate, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Societies, Medical, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review