The DOI matches its Crossref record.
FROM CROWD DYNAMICS TO CROWD SAFETY: A VIDEO-BASED ANALYSIS
Open accessAbstract
The study of crowd dynamics is interesting because of the various self-organization phenomena resulting from the interactions of many pedestrians, which may improve or obstruct their flow. Besides formation of lanes of uniform walking direction and oscillations at bottlenecks at moderate densities, it was recently discovered that stop-and-go waves [D. Helbing et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.97 (2006) 168001] and a phenomenon called "crowd turbulence" can occur at high pedestrian densities [D. Helbing et al., Phys. Rev. E75 (2007) 046109]. Although the behavior of pedestrian crowds under extreme conditions is decisive for the safety of crowds during the access to or egress from mass events as well as for situations of emergency evacuation, there is still a lack of empirical studies of extreme crowding. Therefore, this paper discusses how one may study high-density conditions based on suitable video data. This is illustrated at the example of pilgrim flows entering the previous Jamarat Bridge in Mina, 5 kilometers from the Holy Mosque in Makkah, Saudi-Arabia. Our results reveal previously unexpected pattern formation phenomena and show that the average individual speed does not go to zero even at local densities of 10 persons per square meter. Since the maximum density and flow are different from measurements in other countries, this has implications for the capacity assessment and dimensioning of facilities for mass events. When conditions become congested, the flow drops significantly, which can cause stop-and-go waves and a further increase of the density until critical crowd conditions are reached. Then, "crowd turbulence" sets in, which may trigger crowd disasters. For this reason, it is important to operate pedestrian facilities sufficiently below their maximum capacity and to take measures to improve crowd safety, some of which are discussed in the end.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Globally networked risks and how to respond
Helbing, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12047 · Cited by 1,281
Self-citationPredictability of population displacement after the 2010 Haiti earthquake
Lu, X., Bengtsson, L., & Holme, P. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1203882109 · Cited by 631
Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems can Contribute
Helbing, D., Brockmann, D., Chadefaux, T., Donnay, K., Blanke, U., Woolley-Meza, O., Moussaid, M., Johansson, A., Krause, J., Schutte, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-014-1024-9 · Cited by 615
Self-citationTransitions in pedestrian fundamental diagrams of straight corridors and T-junctions
Zhang, J., Klingsch, W., Schadschneider, A., & Seyfried, A. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/06/p06004 · Cited by 419
COMPARISON OF PEDESTRIAN FUNDAMENTAL DIAGRAM ACROSS CULTURES
CHATTARAJ, U., SEYFRIED, A., & CHAKROBORTY, P. (2009) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525909002209 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- JOHANSSON, A., HELBING, D., AL-ABIDEEN, H. Z., & AL-BOSTA, S.
- Venue
- Advances in Complex Systems
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 497-527
- ISSN
- 0219-5259 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6802
- OpenAlex
- W2117059299
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FROM CROWD DYNAMICS TO CROWD SAFETY: A VIDEO-BASED ANALYSIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0219525908001854
- The paper
- JOHANSSON, A., HELBING, D., AL-ABIDEEN, H. Z., & AL-BOSTA, S. (2008). FROM CROWD DYNAMICS TO CROWD SAFETY: A VIDEO-BASED ANALYSIS. Advances in Complex Systems. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219525908001854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.