The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MINIMUM REDUNDANCY FEATURE SELECTION FROM MICROARRAY GENE EXPRESSION DATA
Abstract
How to selecting a small subset out of the thousands of genes in microarray data is important for accurate classification of phenotypes. Widely used methods typically rank genes according to their differential expressions among phenotypes and pick the top-ranked genes. We observe that feature sets so obtained have certain redundancy and study methods to minimize it. We propose a minimum redundancy — maximum relevance (MRMR) feature selection framework. Genes selected via MRMR provide a more balanced coverage of the space and capture broader characteristics of phenotypes. They lead to significantly improved class predictions in extensive experiments on 6 gene expression data sets: NCI, Lymphoma, Lung, Child Leukemia, Leukemia, and Colon. Improvements are observed consistently among 4 classification methods: Naïve Bayes, Linear discriminant analysis, Logistic regression, and Support vector machines. Supplimentary: The top 60 MRMR genes for each of the datasets are listed in . More information related to MRMR methods can be found at .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Cited by
A survey on feature selection methods
Chandrashekar, G., & Sahin, F. (2014) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024 · Cited by 5,189
Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis
Qin, N., Yang, F., Li, A., Prifti, E., Chen, Y., Shao, L., Guo, J., Le Chatelier, E., Yao, J., Wu, L., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13568 · Cited by 2,177
Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology
Bera, K., Braman, N., Gupta, A., Velcheti, V., & Madabhushi, A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00560-7 · Cited by 819
Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling
Caicedo, J. C., Cooper, S., Heigwer, F., Warchal, S., Qiu, P., Molnar, C., Vasilevich, A. S., Barry, J. D., Bansal, H. S., Kraus, O., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4397 · Cited by 739
Multimodal deep learning models for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease stage
Venugopalan, J., Tong, L., Hassanzadeh, H. R., & Wang, M. D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74399-w · Cited by 732
A survey on filter techniques for feature selection in gene expression microarray analysis
Lazar, C., Taminau, J., Meganck, S., Steenhoff, D., Coletta, A., Molter, C., de Schaetzen, V., Duque, R., Bersini, H., & Nowe, A. (2012) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2012.33 · Cited by 619
From explanations to feature selection: assessing SHAP values as feature selection mechanism
Marcilio, W. E., & Eler, D. M. (2020) · 2020 33rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) · doi:10.1109/sibgrapi51738.2020.00053 · Cited by 504
EEG Based Emotion Recognition: A Tutorial and Review
Li, X., Zhang, Y., Tiwari, P., Song, D., Hu, B., Yang, M., Zhao, Z., Kumar, N., & Marttinen, P. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3524499 · Cited by 508
Machine learning and integrative analysis of biomedical big data
Mirza, B., Wang, W., Wang, J., Choi, H., Chung, N. C., & Ping, P. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10020087 · Cited by 380
Sun, D., Wang, M., & Li, A. (2019) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2018.2806438 · Cited by 338
Feature selection with multi-view data: A survey
Zhang, R., Nie, F., Li, X., & Wei, X. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.11.019 · Cited by 313
Specific Gut Microbiome Signature Predicts the Early-Stage Lung Cancer
Zheng, Y., Fang, Z., Xue, Y., Zhang, J., Zhu, J., Gao, R., Yao, S., Ye, Y., Wang, S., Lin, C., et al. (2020) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2020.1737487 · Cited by 301
Information-Theoretic Inference of Large Transcriptional Regulatory Networks
Meyer, P. E., Kontos, K., Lafitte, F., & Bontempi, G. (2007) · EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology · doi:10.1155/2007/79879 · Cited by 273
Probabilistic movement modeling for intention inference in human–robot interaction
Wang, Z., Mülling, K., Deisenroth, M. P., Ben Amor, H., Vogt, D., Schölkopf, B., & Peters, J. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913478447 · Cited by 171
Gut Metagenomics-Derived Genes as Potential Biomarkers of Parkinson’s Disease
Qian, Y., Yang, X., Xu, S., Huang, P., Li, B., Du, J., He, Y., Su, B., Xu, L.-M., Wang, L., et al. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa201 · Cited by 139
Overfitting in linear feature extraction for classification of high-dimensional image data
Liu, R., & Gillies, D. F. (2016) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2015.11.015 · Cited by 123
Ghiassian, S., Greiner, R., Jin, P., & Brown, M. R. G. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166934 · Cited by 116
Wee, C.-Y., Wang, L., Shi, F., Yap, P.-T., & Shen, D. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22411 · Cited by 89
Proteomic changes upon treatment with semaglutide in individuals with obesity
Maretty, L., Gill, D., Simonsen, L., Soh, K., Zagkos, L., Galanakis, M., Sibbesen, J., Iglesias, M. T., Secher, A., Valkenborg, D., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03355-2 · Cited by 86
Massively parallel feature selection: an approach based on variance preservation
Zhao, Z., Zhang, R., Cox, J., Duling, D., & Sarle, W. (2013) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-013-5373-4 · Cited by 85
Comparative assessment of differential network analysis methods
Lichtblau, Y., Zimmermann, K., Haldemann, B., Lenze, D., Hummel, M., & Leser, U. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbw061 · Cited by 76
Zhu, Y., Jiang, B., Zhu, J., Wang, X., Wang, R., Wei, X., & Dai, H. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.129283 · Cited by 59
Feature Selection Boosted by Unselected Features
Zheng, W., Chen, S., Fu, Z., Zhu, F., Yan, H., & Yang, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3058172 · Cited by 51
Meng, L., Zhang, A., Chen, C., Wang, X., Jiang, X., Tao, L., Fan, J., Wu, X., Dai, C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21030799 · Cited by 45
Translational bioinformatics and healthcare informatics: computational and ethical challenges.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 24
A Network Approach to Wound Healing
Arodz, T., Bonchev, D., & Diegelmann, R. F. (2013) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2012.0386 · Cited by 22
Souchet, B., Michaïl, A., Heuillet, M., Dupuy-Gayral, A., Haudebourg, E., Pech, C., Berthemy, A., Autelitano, F., Billoir, B., Domoto-Reilly, K., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.14283/jpad.2024.34 · Cited by 15
Jalalifar, S. A., Soliman, H., Sahgal, A., & Sadeghi-Naini, A. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14205133 · Cited by 15
Unleashing the potential of cell painting assays for compound activities and hazards prediction
Odje, F., Meijer, D., von Coburg, E., van der Hooft, J. J. J., Dunst, S., Medema, M. H., & Volkamer, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2024.1401036 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- DING, C., & PENG, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 03
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 185-205
- ISSN
- 0219-7200 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-6334
- OpenAlex
- W2131987814
- Cited by
- 2,751
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
