The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SECURITY OF QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION
Open accessAbstract
Quantum Information Theory is an area of physics which studies both fundamental and applied issues in quantum mechanics from an information-theoretical viewpoint. The underlying techniques are, however, often restricted to the analysis of systems which satisfy a certain independence condition. For example, it is assumed that an experiment can be repeated independently many times or that a large physical system consists of many virtually independent parts. Unfortunately, such assumptions are not always justified. This is particularly the case for practical applications — e.g. in quantum cryptography — where parts of a system might have an arbitrary and unknown behavior. We propose an approach which allows us to study general physical systems for which the above mentioned independence condition does not necessarily hold. It is based on an extension of various information-theoretical notions. For example, we introduce new uncertainty measures, called smooth min- and max-entropy, which are generalizations of the von Neumann entropy. Furthermore, we develop a quantum version of de Finetti's representation theorem, as described below. Consider a physical system consisting of n parts. These might, for instance, be the outcomes of n runs of a physical experiment. Moreover, we assume that the joint state of this n-partite system can be extended to an (n + k)-partite state which is symmetric under permutations of its parts (for some k ≫ 1). The de Finetti representation theorem then says that the original n-partite state is, in a certain sense, close to a mixture of product states. Independence thus follows (approximatively) from a symmetry condition. This symmetry condition can easily be met in many natural situations. For example, it holds for the joint state of n parts, which are chosen at random from an arbitrary (n + k)-partite system. As an application of these techniques, we prove the security of quantum key distribution (QKD), i.e. secret key agreement by communication over a quantum channel. In particular, we show that, in order to analyze QKD protocols, it is generally sufficient to consider so-called collective attacks, where the adversary is restricted to applying the same operation to each particle sent over the quantum channel separately. The proof is generic and thus applies to known protocols such as BB84 and B92 (where better bounds on the secret-key rate and on the the maximum tolerated noise level of the quantum channel are obtained) as well as to continuous variable schemes (where no full security proof has been known). Furthermore, the security holds with respect to a strong so-called universally composable definition. This implies that the keys generated by a QKD protocol can safely be used in any application, e.g. for one-time pad encryption — which, remarkably, is not the case for most standard definitions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777
Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems
Shannon, C. E. (1949) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb00928.x · Cited by 9,440
New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality
Wegman, M. N., & Carter, J. L. (1981) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(81)90033-7 · Cited by 1,402
Randomizing Quantum States: Constructions and Applications
Hayden, P., Leung, D., Shor, P. W., & Winter, A. (2004) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1087-6 · Cited by 345
The Universal Composable Security of Quantum Key Distribution
Ben-Or, M., Horodecki, M., Leung, D. W., Mayers, D., & Oppenheim, J. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30576-7_21 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 · Cited by 2,688
Advances in quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.361502 · Cited by 2,033
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
The Operational Meaning of Min- and Max-Entropy
Konig, R., Renner, R., & Schaffner, C. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2025545 · Cited by 659
Self-citationThe thermodynamic meaning of negative entropy
Rio, L. D., Åberg, J., Renner, R., Dahlsten, O., & Vedral, V. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10123 · Cited by 420
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- RENNER, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Quantum Information
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 06
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 1-127
- ISSN
- 0219-7499 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6918
- OpenAlex
- W2403732950
- Cited by
- 1,047
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 59.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SECURITY OF QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0219749908003256
- The paper
- RENNER, R. (2008). SECURITY OF QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION. International Journal of Quantum Information. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219749908003256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.