Cited by 1,402Algorithms and Data CompressionCryptography and Data SecurityCoding theory and cryptography

New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality

Open access
Wegman, Mark N., Carter, J.Lawrence·1981·Journal of Computer and System Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-0000(81)90033-7

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Toeplitz-hashing extractor is a strong extractor.

    “This kind of extractor is also a strong extractor. 101”

    From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [101]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wegman, M. N., & Carter, J. L.
Affiliations
IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
265-279
ISSN
0022-0000 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985623009
Cited by
1,402
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 59
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Computer and System Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
Keywords
hash functions, authentication, message authentication, probabilistic data structures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review