The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Hedging, Hedge Accounting, and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China
Open accessAbstract
Synopsis The research problem This study examines the association between hedge-based derivatives usage and stock price crash risk, as well as the moderating effect of International Financial Reporting Standard 9 — Financial Instruments (IFRS 9) hedge accounting requirements on the association between derivatives usage and stock price crash risk in China. Motivation A growing number of companies worldwide are using financial derivatives to hedge risks; however, evidence is mixed on whether hedge-based derivatives usage increases or decreases firm transparency. While prior studies have demonstrated that financial reporting complexity can affect the informational effect of derivatives, evidence is limited on whether and how the recent changes in hedge accounting requirements in IFRS 9 affect the capital market outcomes of derivatives. Using data from China, one of the largest emerging markets, we tested the informational effects of hedge-based derivatives usage and IFRS 9 requirements to provide incremental evidence on the market outcomes of firm use of financial derivatives. The findings have implications for international investors and facilitate the International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) postimplementation review of the IFRS 9 hedge accounting requirements. The test hypotheses Our first hypothesis is that no association exists between hedging and stock price crash risk in China. Our second hypothesis is that the implementation of IFRS 9 requirements does not influence the association between hedging and stock price crash risk in China. Target population This study is of interest to accounting and finance researchers, firm managers, accounting practitioners, international accounting standard setters, regulatory authorities, and investors. Adopted methodology Ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions, difference-in-differences (DiD) research design, propensity score matching (PSM), and entropy balancing (EB) are used in this research. Analyses We manually collected derivatives-related information (including purposes of derivatives usage, measurement basis of the derivatives, and hedge accounting treatment) from the annual reports of firms listed on the mainboard of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2016 to 2021. We adopted OLS and a DiD research design to test our hypotheses, and used the PSM and EB methods to address endogeneity concerns. Findings We find a positive association between hedging and stock price crash risk among the listed Chinese companies. Furthermore, after the implementation of IFRS 9, stock price crash risk decreases more among the hedgers than among firms without financial derivatives. Our channel tests show that IFRS 9 increases the quality of hedge accounting information, thus reducing stock price crash risk. The cross-sectional tests further support the capability of IFRS 9 to reduce noise contained in hedge accounting information, therefore improving firm-level transparency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1080/1351847X.2020.1785909 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.001 · DOI
- 10.2308/accr.2001.76.1.1 · DOI
- 10.3905/jfi.2016.25.3.007 · DOI
- 10.1111/1911-3846.12883 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11142-015-9318-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.acclit.2019.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.07.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.09.006 · DOI
- 10.2308/accr-50972 · DOI
- 10.2308/acch-50266 · DOI
- 10.2308/accr-50859 · DOI
- 10.1093/rfs/8.3.743 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2465 · DOI
- 10.1080/00014788.2011.573746 · DOI
- 10.1111/1540-6261.00443 · DOI
- 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2448 · DOI
- 10.1111/jbfa.12510 · DOI
- 10.1111/acfi.12278 · DOI
- Huang W., 2014, Futures and Financial Derivatives, 26
- 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1111/acfi.13268 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.11.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1080/09638180.2021.1918564 · DOI
- 10.1111/1911-3846.12112 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00318.x · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2717 · DOI
- 10.1093/rof/rfm001 · DOI
- 10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.175 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.012 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01143.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/09513571011092529 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11142-021-09595-8 · DOI
- 10.2308/acch.2003.17.1.61 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.10.013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101722 · DOI
- 10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1375 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101671 · DOI
- Wang X. L., 2018, Marketization index of China’s provinces: NERI Report 2018
- Wang X., 2020, Finance Research, 481, 190
- 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.01.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101640 · DOI
- Yan J., 2012, IFC Bulletin, 35, 20
- 10.1111/abac.12310 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.11.007 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, J., Lu, X., Xiao, J., & Ye, R.
- Affiliations
- Accounting Department, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, P. R. China
- Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
- University of Macau (MO)
- University of Greenwich (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ye, Rui
- Venue
- The International Journal of Accounting
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Published
- 2025-03-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 02
- ISSN
- 0020-7063 (ISSN-L)
- 1094-4060
- 2213-3933
- OpenAlex
- W4408802159
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- gala.gre.ac.uk
- Locations
- The International Journal of Accounting (publishedVersion)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Universidade de Macau (MYRG2022-00112-FBA, MYRG-GRG2023-00215-FBA)
- National Social Science Fund of China (23BJY110)
- Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (RDF-21-01-007)
- University of Greenwich (PEGFA small project funding)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Risk Management in Financial Firms
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
- Keywords
- hedge accounting, IFRS 9, financial derivatives, stock price crash risk, hedging, corporate transparency, financial reporting quality, accounting standard implementation, Chinese listed companies, Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review