Cited by 1Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningSpam and Phishing Detection

Examining the Generalizability of English Cyberbullying Detection Models on Malay Informal Text Using Direct Translation

Chew, Shu Xian, Liew, Jasy Suet Yan, Wan Ibrisam Fikry, Wan Ahmad Luqman, Ibrahim, Noor Farizah·2022·International Journal of Asian Language Processing

Abstract

As cyberbullying on social media platforms becomes more rampant in Malaysia, there is a need for automatic cyberbullying detection models that can handle text in the local Malay language. Although Malay is widely used in Malaysia, it remains a low resource language particularly the availability of high-quality Malay cyberbullying corpora required to train machine learning models to effectively identify cyberbullying in the local context. Our study explores the possibility of borrowing from an existing cyberbullying corpus (Formspring with 13,153 posts) in a resource rich language to train an English cyberbullying detection model, and then evaluate the performance of the model on a test set containing 3663 Malay WhatsApp messages translated to English. By using direct translation, we reveal that the model performance greatly relies on the quality and accuracy of the English-to-Malay translation, a problem that is exacerbated by many informal Malay expressions and slangs in WhatsApp messages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s2717554523500054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transfer learning, particularly fine-tuning pre-trained language models such as DistilBERT and ELECTRA-small, has demonstrated promising outcomes in cyberbullying detection, surpassing traditional machine learning methods.

    “Transfer learning, particularly fine-tuning pre-trained language models such as DistilBERT and ELECTRA-small, has demonstrated promising outcomes in cyberbullying detection, surpassing traditional machine learning methods [156].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 1

Authors
Chew, S. X., Liew, J. S. Y., Wan Ibrisam Fikry, W. A. L., & Ibrahim, N. F.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang 11800, Malaysia
Venue
International Journal of Asian Language Processing
Published
2022-09
Volume
32
Issue
02n03
ISSN
  • 2424-791X (ISSN-L)
  • 2717-5545
OpenAlex
W4376876607
Cited by
1
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Asian Language Processing (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for Transdisciplinary Research Grant Scheme (TRGS/1/2020/USM/02/4/2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying detection, Malay language, low-resource languages, cross-lingual transfer, direct translation, informal text, slang, WhatsApp messages, social media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review