Cyberbullying detection: Exploring datasets, technologies, and approaches on social media platforms
Open accessAbstract
Cyberbullying has become a major challenge in the digital era, and many people, especially adolescents, use social media platforms to communicate and share information. Some exploit these platforms to embarrass others through messages, e-mails, speech, and public posts, causing severe psychological harm to victims. This study reviews existing research on technologies, approaches, datasets, and evaluation metrics for cyberbullying detection, while highlighting future directions and key challenges. The findings show that traditional models work reasonably well with small datasets but require constant updates; machine learning models face feature extraction and linguistic limitations; deep learning models perform better but lack multilingual and cross-lingual capabilities; and large language models (LLMs) achieve the highest performance, offering flexibility and rich linguistic features but face issues of high-energy use and real-time applicability. Addressing technological, methodological, dataset, and linguistic challenges will improve cyberbullying detection, helping to protect online communication and promote social responsibility.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review synthesizes 27 studies (2018–2023/2024) on cyberbullying detection across social media, comparing machine learning, deep learning, traditional, and large language model approaches. It finds supervised methods generally outperform unsupervised ones, with SVM, BiLSTM, and BERT highlighted as strong performers, while dataset imbalance, English-language bias, and real-time detection remain major challenges.
Key findings
- Across 27 included studies, supervised methods outperformed unsupervised ones; SVM excelled among machine learning approaches, BiLSTM among deep learning approaches, and BERT among large language models. Traditional rule-based and character percentage matching also reported high performance (e.g., A=0.96, P=0.71, R=0.73, F=0.97 [112]).
- Twitter was the most frequently used data source and English was predominant (74.1% of datasets in Figure 7); dataset issues included limited data, imbalance, inaccurate data, lack of generalization, and bias. Example: a Twitter sexist/racist/neither dataset had 10000:1 high class imbalance, and FormSpring had 6.1% cyberbullying vs. 93.9% non-cyberbullying instances.
- Reported model performance varied: TF-IDF with Naive Bayes/SVM reached A=0.976, P=0.964, R=0.931, F=0.947 [88]; BERT-based models reached A=0.90, P=0.92, R=0.88, F=0.93 [113]; BiLSTM/CNN reached A=0.827, P=0.827, R=0.850, F=0.855 [102].
- Key challenges were categorized as language-, dataset-, and approach-related: diverse linguistic structure, cultural variation, context misinterpretation, class imbalance, inconsistent annotations, limited model interpretability, and lack of real-time detection. Future directions include low-resource language datasets, automated annotation, multi-label classification, ensemble methods, LLMs, and cross-lingual approaches.
Methods
- PRISMA-based systematic review; searched IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, MDPI, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and other sources using cyberbullying-related keywords (e.g., harassment, hate, abuse, toxic, gender, sexism, racism) and language-resource terms.
- Screening: 119 records of abstracts/titles; 50 irrelevant records excluded; 69 publications assessed after duplicates/irrelevant removed; ultimately 27 studies included. The review compared datasets, technologies, approaches, and evaluation metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1) across machine learning, deep learning, traditional, and LLM categories.
Limitations
- Stated: the review may be incomplete because new forms of cyberbullying may emerge given dynamic online interactions.
- Stated: public datasets often suffer from inaccuracies, imbalances, and limitations, impacting detection accuracy; open-source code availability and comparative studies are identified as challenges.
- Evident from text: the review synthesizes only 27 studies and is heavily based on English/Twitter datasets, which may limit generalizability to low-resource languages and other platforms; no primary data collection or meta-analysis is reported.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 98 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
The review identifies technical issues affecting deep learning performance, such as data dependency, generalization, interpretability, overfitting, dataset size, adaptability, and explainability.
“The review also identifies several technical issues affecting performance, such as data dependency, generalization, interpretability, overfitting, dataset size, adaptability, and explainability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Traditional approaches, including rule-based and character percentage matching, effectively classify cyberbullying instances on social media.
“The review shows that traditional approaches, including rule-based and character percentage matching, effectively classify cyberbullying instances on social media.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Statistical approaches like rule-based and character percentage matching techniques outperform current methods in cyberbullying detection on social media.
“Analysis of traditional models reveals that statistical approaches like rule-based and character percentage matching techniques outperform current methods in cyberbullying detection on social media.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More than one source has been used to collect cyberbullying datasets on social media platforms.
“The review identified that more than one source had been used to collect cyberbullying datasets on social media platforms as follows:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The review identified that several studies used feature vector representation in both machine learning and deep learning models for cyberbullying text detection.
“The review identified that several studies used feature vector representation in both machine learning and deep learning models for cyberbullying text detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingnone given
The SVM algorithm excels over other machine learning algorithms in detecting cyberbullying on social media.
“The SVM algorithm, in particular, excels over others.”
- Also stated in: § Dataset Language Focus Size Ref · plain
“The review covers various machine learning approaches, including SVM, LR, NB, RF, DT, XGBoost, and K-means, with SVM showing the best performance in classifying cyberbullying instances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Dataset Language Focus Size Ref · plain
- Findingown data
The chronological distribution of the 27 relevant papers reveals a rising trend from the initial publication in 2018 to 2023.
“Ultimately, 27 relevant papers were acquired, as described in Figure 4(a), illustrating their chronological distribution and revealing a rising trend from the initial publication in 2018 to 2023.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Techniques such as TF-IDF, n-grams, and Lexicon enhance performance in traditional cyberbullying detection.
“Techniques such as TF-IDF, n-grams, and Lexicon also enhance performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The review identifies technical issues affecting large language models, such as scalability, context understanding, and biases.
“The review also identifies technical issues affecting performance, such as scalability, context understanding, and biases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The review identifies technical issues affecting traditional approaches, such as context understanding, scalability, high false positive rates, insensitivity to semantic meaning, and adaptability.
“However, the review identifies technical issues affecting performance, such as context understanding, scalability, high false positive rates, insensitivity to semantic meaning, and adaptability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
English was predominantly the language used in datasets for detecting cyberbullying instances on social media platforms.
“The review revealed that English was predominantly the language used in datasets for detecting cyberbullying instances on social media platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Techniques such as TF-IDF, Bag-of-Words, n-grams, and GloVe are frequently used to enhance performance in machine learning cyberbullying detection.
“Techniques such as TF-IDF, Bag-of-Words, n-grams, and GloVe are frequently used to enhance performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most existing studies concerning cyberbullying detection on social media platforms used Twitter as the main source of data collection.
“The review discovered that most existing studies concerning cyberbullying detection on social media platforms used Twitter as the main source of data collection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Supervised machine learning methods outperform unsupervised ones in detecting cyberbullying on social media.
“Analysis of machine learning approaches reveals that supervised methods outperform unsupervised ones in detecting cyberbullying on social media.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The review found that existing studies on cyberbullying text detection used sparse data representation to efficiently store and process datasets, especially those with many missing values.
“The review found that existing studies on cyberbullying text detection used sparse data representation to efficiently store and process datasets, especially those with many missing values [120].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The review identified that more than one language had been used in cyberbullying datasets on social media platforms.
“The review identified that more than one language had been used in cyberbullying datasets on social media platforms as follows:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Deep learning classifiers face a primary weakness in real-time detection of cyberbullying instances.
“Additionally, deep learning classifiers face a primary weakness in real-time detection of cyberbullying instances [94].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94]
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
The review reveals that most studies on cyberbullying detection focus on dominant languages like English.
“The review reveals that most studies on cyberbullying detection focus on dominant languages like English, although cyberbullying occurs in any language.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cyberbullying occurs in any language.
- Findingnone given
The analysis of datasets used in traditional cyberbullying detection models revealed challenges such as limited data usage and lack of generalization, impacting performance.
“The analysis of datasets used in traditional cyberbullying detection models revealed challenges such as limited data usage and lack of generalization, impacting performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Other sources of datasets besides Twitter are not as commonly used in cyberbullying detection studies.
“Due to these factors, other sources of datasets besides Twitter are not as commonly used in cyberbullying detection studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Non-cyberbully class instances were more prevalent than bullying class instances.
“The review identified that non-cyberbully class instances were more prevalent than bullying class instances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
This imbalance led to several challenges in model training and evaluation.
“This imbalance led to several challenges in model training and evaluation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
A small volume of data was used to train models for the classification of both cyberbullying and non-cyberbullying text.
“Based on the utilization of a small dataset for training learning models to detect cyberbullying on social media platforms, the review identified that a small volume of data was used to train models for the classification of both cyberbullying and non-cyberbullying text [147,148].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation
Models trained with a small volume of data had performance less than 0.5 because they did not have enough samples of either cyberbullying or non-cyberbullying instances to learn strong patterns.
“The results of the models showed that they had uninterested performance, less than a performance ratio of 0.5, since they were trained with a small volume of data and did not have enough samples of either cyberbullying or non-cyberbullying instances to learn strong patterns [59,121].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingnone given
An imbalance of dataset classes is identified in many studies.
“An imbalance of the dataset classes is identified in many studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Existing studies of cyberbullying text detection contain extremely manipulated data that deviated significantly from actual data from social media platforms used to train and evaluate the performance of the models.
“The review identified the presence of extremely manipulated data in existing studies of cyberbullying text detection, which deviated significantly from actual data from social media platforms used to train and evaluate the performance of the models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The imbalance of the data has a significant impact on the training and performance of the models.
“The imbalance of the data has a significant impact on the training and performance of the models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Many studies conduct research on cyberbullying detection on social media platforms based on single labels or binary labels, which categorize instances as either cyberbullying or non-cyberbullying.
“The review identified that many studies conduct research on cyberbullying detection on social media platforms based on single labels or binary labels, which categorize instances as either cyberbullying or non-cyberbullying.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Existing approaches to cyberbullying classification predominantly rely on single-label datasets, categorizing instances as either cyberbullying or non-cyberbullying.
“Existing approaches to cyberbullying instances classification predominantly rely on single-label datasets, categorizing instances as either cyberbullying or non-cyberbullying.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
High-resource languages like English are extensively studied in cyberbullying detection.
“Highresource languages like English are extensively studied, highlighting the importance of analyzing low-resource languages such as Swahili and Bengali.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Public cyberbullying datasets often suffer from inaccuracies, imbalances, and limitations that impact detection accuracy.
“However, public datasets often suffer from inaccuracies, imbalances, and limitations, impacting detection accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Several cyberbullying detection approaches proposed for detecting, preventing, and monitoring cyberbullying have experienced diverse challenges.
“There are several cyberbullying detection approaches proposed for the aim of detecting, preventing, and monitoring cyberbullying instances in social media platforms in order to overcome impacts of cyberbullying but these approaches experienced diverse challenges in detecting cyberbullying instances [5] as follows:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
High quality training and testing data are required to train and test cyberbullying detection models to get effective algorithms.
“High quality training and testing data are required to train and test cyberbullying detection models to get effective algorithms in detecting and identifying cyberbullying instances on social media platforms [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
It is difficult to develop cyberbullying automatic detection systems which are multipurpose to adapt to different digital platforms.
“It is difficult to develop cyberbullying automatic detection systems which are multipurpose to adapt to different digital platforms [9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms are changing in terms of data availability, features, and user interfaces.
- Premisecitation
Collection and labeling of data is cost and time consuming due to restrictions of data source platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram.
“(3) Collection and labeling of data is cost and time consuming due to restrictions of data sources platforms which are social media platforms such as twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Only Twitter platform allows researchers to clone unlabeled data via Twitter API for academic use without more restrictions compared to other social media platforms.
- Interpretationreasoning
Twitter was chosen as a primary data source by many researchers because it provides an easy way to collect and analyze data using an API under reasonable terms and conditions.
“Twitter was chosen as a primary data source by many researchers because it provides an easy way for them to collect and analyze data using an Application Programming Interface (API) under reasonable terms and conditions based on privacy and the intended use of the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Deep learning architectures outperform conventional methods in identifying cyberbullying and spam-like comments.
“Deep learning architectures outperform conventional methods in identifying cyberbullying and spam-like comments, highlighting their superiority in this field [96].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cyberbullying classifiers and natural language processing algorithms are primarily developed to analyze and detect cyberbullying instances in English text.
“Firstly, cyberbullying classifiers and natural language processing algorithms are primarily developed to analyze and detect cyberbullying instances in English text [125,126].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Machine learning methods have shown high accuracy in identifying cyberbullying on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Wikipedia.
“They have shown high accuracy in identifying cyberbullying on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Wikipedia [75].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Twitter offers real-time capabilities, allowing researchers to analyze trends and patterns in cyberbullying characteristics as they occur.
“Additionally, Twitter offers real-time capabilities, allowing researchers to analyze trends and patterns in cyberbullying characteristics as they occur.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
Ultimately, 27 relevant papers were acquired for the systematic review.
“Ultimately, 27 relevant papers were acquired, as described in Figure 4(a), illustrating their chronological distribution and revealing a rising trend from the initial publication in 2018 to 2023.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Machine learning approaches enhance cyberbullying detection by extracting features such as textual instances, behavioral patterns, and demographics, thus improving precision.
“Machine learning approaches enhance cyberbullying detection by extracting features such as textual instances, behavioral patterns, and demographics, thus improving precision [73].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A shortage of labeled social media platform datasets suitable for training effective cyberbullying detection systems exists.
“This leads to a shortage of labeled social media platform datasets suitable for training effective cyberbullying detection systems [150].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [150] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Labeling of datasets requires experts and linguists who have a comprehensive understanding of the language context to produce accurate datasets.
- Premisecitation
Cultural disparities and region-specific topics on social media platforms increase the diversity and quantity of user-generated instances, thereby complicating the linguistic dimensions of cyberbullying detection.
“Moreover, the presence of cultural disparities and region-specific topics on social media platforms increases the diversity and quantity of usergenerated instances, thereby complicating the linguistic dimensions of cyberbullying detection [100].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Misinterpreting context may result in cyberbullying becoming conflated with general cyber harassment, complicating efforts to measure and comprehend the exact phenomenon.
“It may result in cyberbullying becoming conflated with general cyber harassment, complicating efforts to measure and comprehend the exact phenomenon [143].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Typographic elements like capitalization, punctuation, and emojis present additional complexities in identifying cyberbullying within social media platform instances.
“Factors such as the utilization of typographic elements like capitalization, punctuation, and emojis present additional complexities in identifying cyberbullying within social media platform instances [134].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [134]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Imbalance led the model to struggle in generalizing new and unseen data in the cyberbullying class because the model had not seen enough examples of the cyberbullying class during training to learn robust patterns.
“Secondly, poor generalization: this led the model to struggle in generalizing new and unseen data in the cyberbullying class because the model had not seen enough examples of the cyberbullying class during training to learn robust patterns [105].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [105]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Access restrictions on high-quality data constrain the utility of cutting-edge techniques, thereby limiting their applicability.
“Access restrictions on high-quality data constrain the utility of cutting-edge techniques, thereby limiting their applicability [123].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [123] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The utilization of a large dataset significantly improves the performance of the models in classifying either cyberbullying or non-cyberbullying texts.
“The utilization of a large dataset significantly improves the performance of the models in classifying either cyberbullying or non-cyberbullying texts [85,149].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Misinterpreting context may delay efforts to effectively tackle and stop cyberbullying, as it might not be recognized as a distinct characteristic of cyberbullying.
“Misinterpreting context may also delay efforts to effectively tackle and stop cyberbullying, as it might not be recognized as a distinct characteristic of cyberbullying [144].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
It was difficult to set a threshold for detecting cyberbullying due to bias towards the non-cyberbullying class.
“Furthermore, it was difficult to set a threshold for detecting cyberbullying due to bias towards the non-cyberbullying class [113].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A lack of comprehension of the context surrounding cyberbullying can hinder the creation of precise and well-organized tools for identifying risks.
“Furthermore, a lack of comprehension of the context surrounding cyberbullying can hinder the creation of precise and well-organized tools for identifying risks, as external viewpoints may not fully grasp the experiences and perspectives of those involved [145].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [145] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Using inaccurate data leads models to underperform due to misclassification of some cyberbullying instances.
“The impact of using inaccurate data is evident when it comes to the real situation of cyberbullying detection on social media platforms, as the models underperform due to misclassification of some cyberbullying instances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Errors can occur during data annotations, leading to data labeling inconsistency.
“Sometimes, errors can occur during data annotations, leading to data labeling inconsistency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Without a comprehensive understanding of the context in which statements are made, distinguishing between cyberbullying and non-cyberbullying statements can be challenging.
“Without a comprehensive understanding of the context in which these statements are made, distinguishing between cyberbullying and non-cyberbullying statements can be challenging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interpretation of cyberbullying heavily relies on context.
- Premisecitation
Misinterpreting context may lead to varying findings and overstated claims regarding the prevalence, progression over time, and impacts of cyberbullying.
“Misinterpreting context may lead to varying findings and overstated claims regarding the prevalence, progression over time, and impacts of cyberbullying [142].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [142] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Classifiers may struggle to interpret nuances in human-based expressions, resulting in failures to identify instances of bullying.
“Additionally, classifiers may struggle to interpret nuances in human-based expressions, resulting in failures to identify instances of bullying [94].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Training and fine-tuning multilingual pre-trained language models suffer from significant computational costs due to the models' large parameter sizes.
“However, the training and fine-tuning process suffer from significant computational costs due to the models' large parameter sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Lack of transparency makes it difficult for humans to understand what is done behind the scenes and what causes the performance of the model to be either low, moderate, or high.
“This makes it difficult for humans to understand what is done behind the scenes and what causes the performance of the model to be either low, moderate, or high [158].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [158] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The effectiveness of cyberbullying detection methods significantly depends on the quality and availability of the data used for training.
“The effectiveness of cyberbullying detection methods significantly depends on the quality and availability of the data used for training, thereby influencing the resulting approaches tailored to a specific problem area.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Cross-lingual approaches enable detection algorithms to analyze instances across multiple languages, expanding the dataset used for model training.
“Cross-lingual approaches enable detection algorithms to analyze instances across multiple languages, expanding the dataset used for model training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Transfer learning, particularly fine-tuning pre-trained language models such as DistilBERT and ELECTRA-small, has demonstrated promising outcomes in cyberbullying detection, surpassing traditional machine learning methods.
“Transfer learning, particularly fine-tuning pre-trained language models such as DistilBERT and ELECTRA-small, has demonstrated promising outcomes in cyberbullying detection, surpassing traditional machine learning methods [156].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [156] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The effectiveness of transfer learning and fine-tuning approaches heavily relies on the quality and suitability of the pre-trained models employed.
“The effectiveness of these approaches heavily relies on the quality and suitability of the pre-trained models employed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
AI techniques utilize advanced neural network models such as GANs, Variational Autoencoders, and Recurrent Neural Networks to create synthetic data, addressing the difficulties associated with datasets that lack balance.
“These artificial intelligence techniques utilize advanced neural network models such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders, and Recurrent Neural Networks to create synthetic data, addressing the difficulties associated with datasets that lack balance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In cyberbullying detection, the lack of a clear understanding of how models make predictions presents a significant challenge.
“In cyberbullying detection, the lack of a clear understanding of how models make predictions presents a significant challenge [150].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [150] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
This limitation stems from the rapid generation of various forms of cyberbullying instances on social media platforms.
“This limitation stems from the rapid generation of various forms of cyberbullying instances on social media platforms [161].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The scarcity of quality cyberbullying datasets in languages with limited resources obstructs the development of effective detection models for local contexts.
“Moreover, the scarcity of quality cyberbullying datasets in languages with limited resources obstructs the development of effective detection models for local contexts [155].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [155] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The prolonged duration of social media platform interactions poses a difficulty for transformer models, which have input length constraints.
“The prolonged duration of social media platform interactions poses a difficulty for transformer models, which have input length constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
If pre-trained models do not align well with the specific requirements of cyberbullying detection, performance might suffer.
“Should the pre-trained models not align well with the specific requirements of cyberbullying detection, the performance might suffer [159].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [159] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Classifiers often lack real-time detection capabilities because users continuously generate diverse cyberbullying instances.
“As users generate diverse cyberbullying instances continuously, classifiers often lack real-time detection capabilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Using incorrect data may result in decreased classifier performance since it overlooks the nuances and complications present in real-life bullying situations.
“Using incorrect data may result in decreased classifier performance since it overlooks the nuances and complications present in real-life bullying situations [154].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [154]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Small datasets impede the direct comparison of progress and the assessment of applicability, as they do not adequately capture the necessary complex social dynamics.
“Small datasets impede the direct comparison of progress and the assessment of applicability, as they do not adequately capture the necessary complex social dynamics [120].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Deep learning models, notably BiLSTM, have shown promise in enhancing the effectiveness of cyberbullying detection on social media platforms.
“Introduction to deep learning models has shown promise in enhancing the effectiveness of cyberbullying detection on social media platforms, with one notable model being Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
LS-CB is a framework that combines predictions from transformer models across smaller sliding windows, leading to enhanced performance.
“A solution to this challenge is LS-CB, a framework that combines predictions from transformer models across smaller sliding windows, leading to enhanced performance [114].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
BiLSTMs have demonstrated superior accuracy when compared to both LSTMs and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models.
“In comparative studies, BiLSTMs have demonstrated superior accuracy when compared to both LSTMs and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models [170].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [170]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Cyberbullying detection approaches rely on public datasets that are annotated.
“From the findings on cyberbullying detection approaches, it is evident that these approaches rely on public datasets that are annotated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Models trained on data from one language can be adapted to identify cyberbullying in other languages through transfer learning.
“Moreover, models trained on data from one language can be adapted to identify cyberbullying in other languages through transfer learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Addressing linguistic complexities inherent in user-generated instances across various languages poses a challenge for transfer learning and fine-tuning.
“Furthermore, addressing linguistic complexities inherent in user-generated instances across various languages poses a challenge for transfer learning and fine-tuning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Large Language Models (LLMs), including BERT and RoBERTa, have achieved state-of-the-art results in natural language processing tasks such as cyberbullying detection.
“The state-of-the-art results of natural language processing tasks such as cyberbullying detection have been achieved by Large Language Models (LLMs), including BERT and RoBERTa [114].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ensemble models enhance predictive accuracy by aggregating predictions from several models, resulting in improved classification of cyberbullying categories.
“Ensemble models enhance predictive accuracy by aggregating predictions from several models, resulting in improved classification of cyberbullying categories [172].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [172]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Integrating social media platform attributes such as temporal aspects and social network data has shown promising outcomes in improving classification accuracy in cyberbullying detection models.
“Moreover, integrating social media platform attributes such as temporal aspects and social network data has demonstrated promising outcomes in bolstering classification accuracy in cyberbullying detection models [180].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ensemble models have been shown to outperform individual base models in evaluation metrics such as accuracy and precision.
“Furthermore, ensemble models have been shown to outperform individual base models in evaluation metrics such as accuracy and precision [173].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A multi-label approach facilitates the detection of cyberbullying across different communication channels and mediums.
“This approach facilitates the detection of cyberbullying across different communication channels and mediums.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
LLMs become more effective even with a small volume of data for training since they deliver outstanding performance in cyberbullying detection.
“These models become more effective even with a small volume of data for training models since they deliver outstanding performance in cyberbullying detection [174].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [174]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
LLMs' capacity to grasp the intricacies and context of language aids in precisely recognizing bullying instances across online communication forums and social media platforms.
“Their capacity to grasp the intricacies and context of language aids in precisely recognizing bullying instances across online communication forums and social media platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Introduction of large language models (LLMs) increases the efficiency in cyberbullying detection on social media platforms, including GPT-3, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, FLAN, and LIaMI.
“Introduction of large language models (LLMs) increases the efficiency in cyberbullying detection on social media platforms, including GPT-3, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, FLAN, and LIaMI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Multi-label datasets facilitate the categorization of social media posts into multiple types of bullying, allowing for a thorough examination of cyberbullying occurrences.
“Multi-label datasets facilitate the categorization of social media platform posts into multiple types of bullying, allowing for a thorough examination of cyberbullying occurrences [183].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [183]
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cyberbullying encompasses a range of behaviors, such as verbal abuse, threats, and the dissemination of inappropriate material.
- Rests on an assumption: Cyberbullying can take various linguistic forms, spanning text, images, and multimedia instances.
- May combine two claims. 58
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 66
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwitter is the most frequently used platform, and English is the predominant language in the datasets used in deep learning models for cyberbullying detection.
“Twitter is the most frequently used platform, and English is the predominant language in the datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLarge language models lack real-time cyberbullying detection capability.
“Large language models also lack real-time cyberbullying detection capability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenReddit and YouTube datasets are used more frequently than those from other platforms, with English being the predominant language, in large language model cyberbullying detection.
“Reddit and YouTube datasets are used more frequently than those from other platforms, with English being the predominant language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningLarge language models, including GPT, BERT, XLNet, and XLM, effectively classify cyberbullying instances, especially BERT.
“The review shows that large language models, including GPT, BERT, XLNet, and XLM, effectively classify cyberbullying instances, especially BERT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe review identified weaknesses of machine learning classifiers in cyberbullying detection, including lack of automatic feature extraction, inability to perform real-time detection, and difficulty processing large volumes of data.
“The review identified weaknesses of machine learning classifiers in cyberbullying detection, including the lack of automatic feature extraction methods, inability to perform real-time detection, and difficulty processing large volumes of data [95,122,123].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe review identifies technical issues affecting machine learning performance, such as data volume, time efficiency, false positives and negatives, real-time features, biases, context understanding, adaptability, dataset size, scalability, and interpretability.
“The review also identifies several technical issues affecting performance, such as data volume, time efficiency, false positives and negatives, real-time features, biases, context understanding, adaptability, dataset size, scalability, and interpretability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenTechniques such as TF-IDF, random, and GloVe are frequently used to enhance performance in deep learning cyberbullying detection.
“Techniques such as TF-IDF, random, and GloVe are frequently used to enhance performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe analysis of datasets used in deep learning models for cyberbullying detection identified challenges such as limited data usage, data imbalance, inaccurate data, lack of generalization, and dataset biases, affecting performance.
“The analysis of datasets used in deep learning models for cyberbullying detection identified challenges such as limited data usage, data imbalance, inaccurate data, lack of generalization, and dataset biases, affecting performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSupervised deep learning methods outperform unsupervised ones in detecting cyberbullying on social media, with BiLSTM excelling.
“Analysis of deep learning approaches reveals that supervised methods outperform unsupervised ones in detecting cyberbullying on social media, with the BiLSTM algorithm excelling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe analysis of datasets used in machine learning models for cyberbullying detection identified challenges such as limited data usage, data imbalance, inaccurate data, lack of generalization, and dataset biases, affecting performance.
“The analysis of datasets used in machine learning models for cyberbullying detection identified challenges such as limited data usage, data imbalance, inaccurate data, lack of generalization, and dataset biases, affecting performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAnalysis of datasets for large language models in cyberbullying detection reveals challenges such as limited data usage, data imbalance, lack of generalization, and real-time detection issues, affecting model performance.
“Analysis of datasets for large language models in cyberbullying detection reveals challenges such as limited data usage, data imbalance, lack of generalization, and real-time detection issues, all of which affect model performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwitter is the most frequently used platform, and English is the predominant language in the datasets used in machine learning models for cyberbullying detection.
“Twitter is the most frequently used platform, and English is the predominant language in the datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationTraditional classifiers struggle with automatic feature extraction, processing large data volumes, and understanding word meanings and semantics associated with cyberbullying.
“Traditional classifiers struggle with automatic feature extraction, processing large data volumes, and understanding word meanings and semantics associated with cyberbullying [124].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [124] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenTechniques like TF-IDF and self-attention enhance performance in large language model cyberbullying detection.
“Techniques like TF-IDF and self-attention enhance performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe results from the training and test phases demonstrate the effectiveness of various linguistic features in detecting cyberbullying.
“The results from the training and test phases demonstrate the effectiveness of various linguistic features in detecting cyberbullying.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTUKI and Ofcom were identified as data sources for Swahili and English, respectively, in traditional cyberbullying detection.
“TUKI and Ofcom were identified as data sources for Swahili and English, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenLarge language models are unsupervised approaches that excel in cyberbullying detection on social media, with BERT outperforming other algorithms.
“Analysis of large language models reveals that these unsupervised approaches excel in cyberbullying detection on social media, with BERT outperforming other algorithms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSocial media platform messages often feature informally written text that may not adhere to formal linguistic structures, making it challenging to distinguish patterns within the text.
“Social media platform messages often feature informally written text that may not adhere to formal linguistic structures, making it challenging to distinguish patterns within the text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe SVM algorithm and TF-IDF features are widely utilized in cyberbullying detection.
“The SVM algorithm and TF-IDF features are widely utilized, while traditional approaches face limitations in processing large datasets and real-time detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenExisting public datasets for low-resource languages are limited in their coverage.
“Moreover, there is a pressing need to create datasets specifically for these less powerful languages, as existing public datasets are limited in their coverage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTwitter is the primary dataset source in cyberbullying detection research, due to easy accessibility.
“Twitter has emerged as the primary dataset source due to easy accessibility, with many datasets sourced from platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, Kaggle, etc.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTraditional cyberbullying detection approaches face limitations in processing large datasets and real-time detection.
“The SVM algorithm and TF-IDF features are widely utilized, while traditional approaches face limitations in processing large datasets and real-time detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs such as GPT and BERT play a significant role in enhancing cyberbullying detection accuracy.
“LLMs such as GPT and BERT play a significant role in enhancing detection accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe review identified challenges in open-source code availability and comparative studies in cyberbullying detection.
“The review has identified challenges in open-source code availability and comparative studies, emphasizing the need for resources in non-English languages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCyberbullying continues to occur due to limitations and weaknesses in the technologies and approaches used by existing detection algorithms.
“However, cyberbullying continues to occur due to limitations and weaknesses in the technologies and approaches used by existing detection algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cyberbullying strategies continuously develop and produce obfuscated words such as misspelling and coded languages that aim to harm individuals but are difficult for automatic detection systems to identify.
- Rests on an assumption: Only Twitter platform allows researchers to clone unlabeled data via Twitter API for academic use without more restrictions compared to other social media platforms.
- Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms are changing in terms of data availability, features, and user interfaces.
- Rests on an assumption: Cyberbullying involves several forms such as multimodal and aggregation.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe systematic review employs the structured PRISMA framework to ensure both replicability and transparency.
“The systematic review employs the structured PRISMA framework [12] to ensure both replicability and transparency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCyberbullying has profound negative effects on individuals and society, impacting them economically, socially, and psychologically, with adolescents highly vulnerable.
“Cyberbullying has profound negative effects on individuals and society, impacting them economically, socially, and psychologically.Adolescents, in particular, are highly vulnerable to these effects [47,48].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe increase of users on social media platforms is directly proportional to the increasing number of cyberbullying instances.
“The increase of users on social media platforms is directly proportional to the increasing number of cyberbullying instances [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost cyberbullying detection algorithms are developed for high-resource languages like English, Chinese, French, and German, causing bias in detecting low-resource languages like Swahili, Bengali, and Marathi, which may affect accuracy, precision, and fairness.
“(2) Mostly of cyberbullying detection algorithms are developed to capture cyberbullying instances for high resource languages like English, Chinese, French, and Germany, so it causes bias in detecting cyberbullying instances on low resource languages like Swahili, Bengali, and Marathi which may affect the accuracy, precision and fairness of cyberbullying classification processes [7].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep learning methods accelerate learning and feature selection compared to traditional machine learning, enhancing real-time detection on social media platforms.
“These methods accelerate learning and feature selection compared to traditional machine learning, enhancing real-time detection on social media platforms [95].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep learning approaches offer significant advantages in cyberbullying detection, efficiently managing large datasets, automatically extracting features, and classifying textual and visual instances.
“Deep learning approaches offer significant advantages in cyberbullying detection, efficiently managing large datasets, automatically extracting features, and classifying textual and visual instances [94].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSparse representations store only relevant values and their indices, enhancing efficiency.
“Sparse representations store only relevant values and their indices, enhancing efficiency [121].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCyberbullying reports have increased by nearly 70% despite social media platforms' algorithmic efforts.
“Despite social media platforms' algorithmic efforts, cyberbullying reports have increased by nearly 70% [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe COVID-19 pandemic's shift to virtual interactions intensified cyberbullying instances, especially among adolescents aged 9 to 17.
“The COVID-19 pandemic's shift to virtual interactions intensified cyberbullying instances, especially among adolescents aged 9 to 17 [18][19][20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18][19][20]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMachine learning models require explicit feature engineering, while deep learning models can learn meaningful representations directly from raw data.
“Machine learning models require explicit feature engineering, while deep learning models can learn meaningful representations directly from raw data [90].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSocial media usage is increasing in developing countries, where people often communicate in their native languages, leading to numerous reported cyberbullying instances in these contexts.
“Social media usage is increasing in developing countries, where people often communicate in their native languages, leading to numerous reported cyberbullying instances in these contexts [48].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlgorithms trained on past cases can classify new instances, reducing investigation time and resources.
“Algorithms trained on past cases can classify new instances, reducing investigation time and resources [74].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwitter provides a vast amount of data due to its large user base, resulting in a significant number of active users worldwide.
“Moreover, Twitter provides a vast amount of data due to its large user base, resulting in a significant number of active users worldwide [9,131,132].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningResearchers may opt for Twitter due to its ease of data collection using APIs, real-time capabilities, and availability of a vast amount of textual data.
“Researchers may opt for Twitter due to its ease of data collection using APIs, real-time capabilities, and the availability of a vast amount of textual data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAccurately detecting cyberbullying requires a comprehensive understanding of context and cultural intricacies, posing a challenge for algorithms.
“Accurately detecting cyberbullying requires a comprehensive understanding of context and cultural intricacies, posing a challenge for algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cyberbullying is often subjective and contingent on context.
- Rests on an assumption: The interpretation of cyberbullying heavily relies on context.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLow or accepted and moderate class imbalances are in a 10:1 ratio, but high-class imbalance ranges between 100:1 and 10000:1.
“The low or accepted and moderate class imbalances are in a 10:1 ratio, but high-class imbalance ranges between 100:1 and 10000:1, as shown in Table 10 [146].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [146] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDisparities in cyberbullying can be attributed to cultural norms, educational systems, technological infrastructure, legal frameworks, and socio-economic disparities.
“These disparities can be attributed to cultural norms, educational systems, technological infrastructure, legal frameworks, and socio-economic disparities [141].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationImbalance led models to become more motivated to detect the non-cyberbullying than the cyberbullying class and tended to label most instances as non-cyberbullying.
“Firstly, bias in model training: this led models to become more motivated to detect the non-cyberbullying than the cyberbullying class and tended to label most instances as non-cyberbullying [108].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFacebook and Instagram have stricter terms of service, data privacy policies, and ethical considerations regarding data use and fair use practices.
“Additionally, these platforms have stricter terms of service, data privacy policies, and ethical considerations regarding data use and fair use practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCyberbullying is a global phenomenon, with societal and cross-national differences in rates of bullying and victimization, as well as in the characteristics of cyberbullying instances.
“Studies indicate that cyberbullying is a global phenomenon, with societal and cross-national differences in rates of bullying and victimization, as well as in the characteristics of cyberbullying instances [139,140].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [139]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [140]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA survey paper delves into the necessity for enhanced and more precise detection techniques, along with the exploration of alternative annotation methods.
“A survey paper delves into the necessity for enhanced and more precise detection techniques, along with the exploration of alternative annotation methods [153].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [153] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenPlatforms differ in factors such as number of active users, restrictions on data collection, architectural design, and purpose.
“Each of these platforms differs in various factors, such as the number of active users, restrictions on data collection, architectural design, and purpose.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA deficiency in understanding the context of cyberbullying can impede advancements in research, prevention, and intervention activities.
“In summary, a deficiency in understanding the context of cyberbullying can impede advancements in research, prevention, and intervention activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnnotation errors may be caused by subjective labeling, ambiguous definitions, cultural and contextual variations, inter-annotator agreement, and errors in the annotation process.
“These errors may be caused by various reasons such as subjective labeling, ambiguous definitions, cultural and contextual variations, inter-annotator agreement, and errors in the annotation process [151].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe rise of social media platforms and communication in digital systems has introduced novel avenues for cyberbullying.
“The rise of social media platforms and communication in digital systems has introduced novel avenues for cyberbullying [133].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [133] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVarious cultural factors, including gender, race, ethnicity, disability, and sexual orientation, shape the dynamics of cyberbullying within workplace settings.
“Various cultural factors, including gender, race, ethnicity, disability, and sexual orientation, shape the dynamics of cyberbullying within workplace settings [137].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIn imbalanced classes, models predicting the non-cyberbullying class for every instance might still achieve high accuracy, but accuracy alone is insufficient for evaluating the true performance of the model.
“Thirdly, misleading evaluation metrics: models predicting the non-cyberbullying class for every instance might still achieve high accuracy, but accuracy alone is insufficient for evaluating the true performance of the model in imbalanced classes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCyberbullying encompasses a variety of linguistic forms, including nonverbal modes of expression, code mixing, and the use of dissimilar languages.
“Cyberbullying encompasses a variety of linguistic forms, including nonverbal modes of expression, code mixing, and the use of dissimilar languages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningFacebook and Instagram are primarily designed for sharing photos and videos, leading to a higher prevalence of visual instances compared to text.
“For instance, Facebook and Instagram are primarily designed for sharing photos and videos, leading to a higher prevalence of visual instances compared to text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe imbalance of datasets is categorized into three groups: low-class, moderate-class, and high-class imbalance.
“The imbalance of datasets is categorized into three groups: low-class, moderate-class, and high-class imbalance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDatasets may be limited due to factors such as incomplete data percentages, inadequate details for comprehensive analytical evaluations, and the utilization of a small dataset for training learning models.
“The dataset might be viewed as limited due to factors such as incomplete data percentages, inadequate details for comprehensive analytical evaluations, and the utilization of a small dataset for training learning models [120].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Barlett Gentile cyberbullying model (BGCM) is a robust framework for predicting cyberbullying behaviors and attitudes across diverse cultural contexts.
“The Barlett Gentile cyberbullying model (BGCM) has been identified as a robust framework for predicting cyberbullying behaviors and attitudes across diverse cultural contexts [138].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [138] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAutomated methods like Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) models have been suggested for labeling data and enriching training sets using unlabeled data.
“In response to this challenge, automated methods like Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) models have been suggested for labeling data and enriching training sets using unlabeled data [121].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA study introduces a labeled Instagram dataset with comprehensive annotations on critical cyberbullying characteristics.
“Furthermore, a study introduces a labeled Instagram dataset with comprehensive annotations on critical cyberbullying characteristics, offering fresh perspectives for automated detection [152].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [152]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDetecting cyberbullying presents a challenge for multilingual pre-trained language models due to their struggle with extended social media platform sessions and the issue of imbalanced classes.
“Detecting cyberbullying presents a challenge for multilingual pre-trained language models due to their struggle with extended social media platform sessions and the issue of imbalanced classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTransfer learning techniques show promising potential to address the challenge of low resources in many languages, especially low-resource languages like Swahili.
“Due to the challenge of low resources in many languages, especially low-resource languages like Swahili, transfer learning techniques show promising potential to address this challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCombining multiple detection techniques into an ensemble model can leverage the strengths of each approach while mitigating individual weaknesses, thereby improving overall detection accuracy.
“Combining multiple detection techniques into an ensemble model can leverage the strengths of each approach while mitigating individual weaknesses, thereby improving overall detection accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningExpanding cyberbullying detection to various languages presents unique challenges specific to each language.
“Expanding cyberbullying detection to various languages presents unique challenges specific to each language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSocial media platforms encompass users from diverse regions who speak various languages.
“Social media platforms encompass users from diverse regions who speak various languages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenCross-lingual methods facilitate data augmentation by utilizing labeled data from one language to refine model training in languages with limited labeled data.
“Furthermore, cross-lingual methods facilitate data augmentation by utilizing labeled data from one language to refine model training in languages with limited labeled data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIf data is of poor quality, showing behaviors like inconsistency, low quality, sparsity, noise, non-representativeness, ambiguous values, imbalance, and irrelevant features, resulting cyberbullying detection approaches may exhibit reduced accuracy.
“Consequently, if the data is of poor quality, showing behaviors like inconsistency, low quality, sparsity, noise, non-representativeness, ambiguous values, imbalance, and irrelevant features, resulting cyberbullying detection approaches may exhibit reduced accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrent cyberbullying detection models are either incomplete or demonstrate restricted effectiveness when applied to real-time situations.
“Current cyberbullying detection models are either incomplete or demonstrate restricted effectiveness when applied to real-time situations [157].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy traversing input data in both directions, BiLSTMs potentially enhance training capabilities, leading to improved detection and prediction outcomes.
“By traversing input data in both directions, BiLSTMs potentially enhance training capabilities, leading to improved detection and prediction outcomes [171].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [171]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningChallenges of data can delay effective processing and lead to inaccurate conclusions, posing a significant challenge in deriving insights from the data.
“Challenges of data can delay effective processing and lead to inaccurate conclusions, posing a significant challenge in deriving insights from the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVarious forms of cyberbullying include sarcasm, toxicity, hate speech, and attacks based on ethnicity and religion, which are used to target individuals on social media platforms.
“Additionally, there are various forms of cyberbullying, including sarcasm, toxicity, hate speech, and attacks based on ethnicity and religion, which are used to target individuals on social media platforms [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMachine learning, deep learning, traditional, and large language models may detect cyberbullying instances on social media platforms, but they lack transparency in the decision-making process.
“Both machine learning, deep learning, traditional, and large language models have shown that they may detect cyberbullying instances on social media platforms, but they lack transparency in the decision-making process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationData augmentation enriches the training dataset, bolstering the generalization capability of detection models and heightening accuracy.
“This augmentation enriches the training dataset, bolstering the generalization capability of detection models and heightening accuracy [168].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [168]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGAN-based Oversampling (GBO) and Support Vector Machine-SMOTE-GAN (SSG) have been suggested to improve dataset balance and boost the performance of models.
“In particular, novel approaches like GAN-based Oversampling (GBO) and Support Vector Machine-SMOTE-GAN (SSG) have been suggested to improve dataset balance and boost the performance of models [166].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [166]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTransfer learning and fine-tuning exhibit potential in cyberbullying detection but come with limitations and may not always represent the most optimal strategy.
“Hence, while transfer learning and fine-tuning exhibit potential in cyberbullying detection, they come with limitations and may not always represent the most optimal strategy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationMultilingual pre-trained language models provide a solution for applying models to low-resource languages without requiring additional training, thereby addressing the data availability gap between high and low-resource languages.
“Multilingual pre-trained language models provide a solution for applying models to low-resource languages without requiring additional training, thereby addressing the data availability gap between high and lowresource languages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAnnotating data, such as categorizing, tagging, or labeling huge volumes of raw data, poses significant challenges for constructing discriminative supervised tasks.
“Consequently, annotating data, such as categorizing, tagging, or labeling huge volumes of raw data, poses significant challenges for constructing discriminative supervised tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe bidirectional approach significantly improves the model's ability to understand dependencies along the sequence in both directions, making BiLSTM well-suited for tasks involving sequential data.
“This bidirectional approach significantly improves the model's ability to understand dependencies along the sequence in both directions, making it well-suited for tasks involving sequential data [101].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUtilizing transfer learning and fine-tuning techniques demands extensive computational resources and time, along with abundant data to enhance the detection capabilities of models.
“Utilizing transfer learning and fine-tuning techniques demands extensive computational resources and time, along with abundant data to enhance the detection capabilities of models [155].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [155] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBy training models on data from higher-resource languages like English and then adapting them for languages with lower resources, transfer learning increases the accuracy and performance in cyberbullying detection on social media platforms.
“By training models on data from higherresource languages like English and then adapting them for languages with lower resources, transfer learning increases the accuracy and performance in cyberbullying detection on social media platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe utilization of cutting-edge methods is constrained by restricted access to top-tier data, leading to the creation of small, varied datasets that impede straightforward comparisons of advancements.
“The utilization of cutting-edge methods is constrained by restricted access to top-tier data, leading to the creation of small, varied datasets that impede straightforward comparisons of advancements [120].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenBiLSTM processes input sequences in both forward and backward directions, enabling it to capture information from both past and future contexts.
“BiLSTM operates by processing input sequences in both forward and backward directions, enabling it to capture information from both past and future contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningData may contain more than one language in one instance, so code-switching modeling is needed to address this mixed-language challenge.
“Sometimes, data may be found that contains more than one language in one instances, so code-switching modeling is needed to address this mixed-language challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese complexities involve cultural nuances, unconventional use of linguistic resources, and the availability of native language input methods.
“These complexities involve cultural nuances, unconventional use of linguistic resources, and the availability of native language input methods [160].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGANs hold potential for producing synthetic data to address dataset class imbalance challenges.
“Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) hold potential for producing synthetic data to address dataset class imbalance challenges [163][164][165].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [163]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [164]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [165]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationModels like BERT and RoBERTa excel in natural language processing tasks but have not been broadly utilized for cyberbullying detection.
“While models like BERT and RoBERTa excel in natural language processing tasks, they haven't been broadly utilized for cyberbullying detection [150].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [150] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCertain characteristics revealing cyberbullying may be common across languages despite language differences.
“Additionally, despite language differences, certain characteristics revealing cyberbullying may be common across languages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUsers may express opinions, ideas, and comments in their respective languages, some of which may involve inappropriate language leading to online harassment.
“However, these users may express opinions, ideas, and comments in their respective languages, some of which may involve inappropriate language leading to online harassment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenVarious classifiers may detect cyberbullying instances in different forms on social media platforms.
“Various classifiers may detect cyberbullying instances in different forms on social media platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLeveraging modern contextual language models such as BERT and slang-based word embeddings can greatly enhance cyberbullying detection, surpassing conventional models.
“Furthermore, leveraging modern contextual language models such as BERT and word embeddings based on slang can greatly enhance the detection of cyberbullying, surpassing the capabilities of conventional models [177].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [177]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUsing crowdsourcing techniques to replicate actual bullying instances in a controlled laboratory environment can produce credible data that augment existing datasets and boost classifier accuracy.
“Using crowdsourcing techniques to replicate actual instances of bullying within a controlled laboratory environment can produce credible data, augmenting existing datasets and boosting the accuracy of classifiers [120].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe identification of cyberbullying instances relies on analyzing user data alongside personal characteristics such as name, gender, age, interests, and other human behaviors.
“The identification of cyberbullying instances relies on analyzing user data alongside personal characteristics such as name, gender, age, interests, and other human behaviors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAs detection algorithms advance, social media platforms must grapple with ethical issues related to privacy, security, bias, and censorship.
“As detection algorithms advance, social media platforms must grapple with ethical issues related to privacy, security, bias, and censorship.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningImproved detection could foster a more favorable online environment, especially for vulnerable demographics like youths and adolescents.
“This, in turn, could foster a more favorable online environment, especially for vulnerable demographics like youths and adolescents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenImproving cyberbullying detection methods could enhance user safety by promptly recognizing and addressing harmful conduct.
“Improving cyberbullying detection methods could enhance user safety by promptly recognizing and addressing harmful conduct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccurate detection of cyberbullying necessitates comprehension of various factors, including gender, religious affiliation, ethnicity, age, levels of aggression, and instances of non-cyberbullying.
“Accurate detection of cyberbullying necessitates comprehension of various factors, including but not limited to gender, religious affiliation, ethnicity, age, levels of aggression, and instances of non-cyberbullying [182].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [182]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDetecting cyberbullying in low-resource languages poses significant challenges due to linguistic intricacies, informal expressions, and the prevalence of slang.
“Detecting cyberbullying in these low-resource languages poses significant challenges due to linguistic intricacies, informal expressions, and the prevalence of slang.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBy swiftly identifying and removing inappropriate or harmful instances without human intervention, automatic instances moderation helps social media platforms maintain a safe and positive online environment.
“By swiftly identifying and removing inappropriate or harmful instances without human intervention, automatic instances moderation helps social media platforms maintain a safe and positive online environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLLMs are adept at managing extensive datasets and continuously refining their performance through learning, thereby enhancing their efficacy over time.
“Furthermore, LLMs are adept at managing extensive datasets and continuously refining their performance through learning, thereby enhancing their efficacy over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningStriking a delicate balance between safety, user privacy, and the right to freedom of expression poses a complex challenge that requires careful deliberation.
“Striking a delicate balance between safety, user privacy, and the right to freedom of expression poses a complex challenge that requires careful deliberation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe development of cross-lingual NLP models addresses the challenge of cross-linguistic and cross-cultural aspects of cyberbullying.
“The development of cross-lingual NLP models addresses the challenge of cross-linguistic and cross-cultural aspects of cyberbullying.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe development of multilingual frameworks simplifies the integration of data from multiple languages and cultural contexts to enhance performance in cyberbullying detection on social media platforms.
“The development of multilingual frameworks simplifies the integration of data from multiple languages and cultural contexts to enhance performance in cyberbullying detection on social media platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCyberbullying detection methods analyze user-generated instances to identify and remove material that violates community standards or legal requirements, such as offensive or abusive instances.
“Cyberbullying detection methods analyze user-generated instances to identify and remove material that violates community standards or legal requirements, such as offensive or abusive instances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEmploying advanced models like the BiGRU-CNN sentiment classification model can notably improve cyberbullying detection by merging global and local features, attention mechanisms, and enhanced learning rates, resulting in superior classification accuracy.
“Additionally, employing advanced models like the BiGRU-CNN sentiment classification model can notably improve cyberbullying detection by merging global and local features, attention mechanisms, and enhanced learning rates, ultimately resulting in superior classification accuracy [181].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCross-lingual NLP involves processing natural language data across diverse languages and simplifying the detection mechanism of cyberbullying instances on social media platforms.
“This approach involves processing natural language data across diverse languages and simplifying the detection mechanism of cyberbullying instances on social media platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIntegrating textual, contextual, emotional, social attributes, and sentiment characteristics with conventional text features can elevate cyberbullying detection efficiency.
“Integrating textual, contextual, emotional, social attributes, and sentiment characteristics together with conventional text features can elevate cyberbullying”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDeep learning methods offer promise in handling large datasets and automatic feature extraction.
“Deep learning methods offer promise in handling large datasets and automatic feature extraction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Cyberbullying strategies continuously develop and produce obfuscated words such as misspelling and coded languages that aim to harm individuals but are difficult for automatic detection systems to identify.
“Apart from that there is continuous development of cyberbullying strategies which produce obfuscated words such as misspelling, and coded languages that aim to harm individuals but it is difficult to be identified by cyberbullying automatic detection systems, so, powerful tools are required to detect these kinds of cyberbullying instances.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a significant number of users on social media platforms who communicate in English.
“Additionally, there is a significant number of users on social media platforms who communicate in English.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Translation tools integrated into social media platforms facilitate the translation of texts from other languages to English and vice versa.
“Moreover, translation tools integrated into social media platforms facilitate the translation of texts from other languages to English and vice versa.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Major social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have a large user base communicating primarily in English, providing ample English language data.
“Major social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram boast a large user base communicating primarily in English, thereby providing ample English language”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cyberbullying occurs in any language.
“The review reveals that most studies on cyberbullying detection focus on dominant languages like English, although cyberbullying occurs in any language.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Only Twitter platform allows researchers to clone unlabeled data via Twitter API for academic use without more restrictions compared to other social media platforms.
“Only Twitter platform allows researchers to clone unlabeled data via twitter API for academic use without more restrictions compared to other social media platforms with tight restrictions to get data from them.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Social media platforms are changing in terms of data availability, features, and user interfaces.
“(4) Social media platforms are changing in terms of data availability, features, and user interfaces.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cyberbullying involves several forms such as multimodal and aggregation.
“Cyberbullying involves several forms such as multimodal and aggregation therefore, many cyberbullying detection algorithms are developed to classify cyberbullying instances in text based only which cannot classify all forms of cyberbullying.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cyberbullying is often subjective and contingent on context.
“Cyberbullying is often subjective and contingent on context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The interpretation of cyberbullying heavily relies on context.
“The interpretation of cyberbullying heavily relies on context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Labeling of datasets requires experts and linguists who have a comprehensive understanding of the language context to produce accurate datasets.
“Labeling of datasets requires experts and linguists who have a comprehensive understanding of the language context to produce accurate datasets.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Technology evolves rapidly, and bullies continuously develop new methods to harass others.
“However, technology evolves rapidly, and bullies continuously develop new methods to harass others.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cyberbullying encompasses a range of behaviors, such as verbal abuse, threats, and the dissemination of inappropriate material.
“However, cyberbullying encompasses a range of behaviors, such as verbal abuse, threats, and the dissemination of inappropriate material.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cyberbullying can take various linguistic forms, spanning text, images, and multimedia instances.
“Moreover, cyberbullying can take various linguistic forms, spanning text, images, and multimedia instances.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Deepfake instances are often used to harass or bully another person.
“This instances is often used to harass or bully another person.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Communities in sociology and psychology possess significant insights into cyberbullying, as they address various mental health issues stemming from online harassment.
“Communities, especially those in sociology and psychology, possess significant insights into cyberbullying, as they address various mental health issues stemming from online harassment for various reasons.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cyberbullying detection models and intervention tools are often trained around rigid and subjective cyberbullying criteria, potentially overlooking experiences that adolescents perceive as harmful.
“This is particularly relevant given that cyberbullying detection models and intervention tools are often trained around the rigid and subjective cyberbullying criteria, potentially overlooking experiences that adolescents perceive as harmful (124, 125).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [125]
Section 5.2.5 (page not provided) identifies subjective labeling and ambiguous definitions in datasets used to train detection systems; §5.2.7 says many studies use binary labels that miss other forms of cyberbullying. Section 5.2.1 warns that tools can miss the perspectives of those involved when context is misunderstood. The paper does not establish that intervention tools are often trained on rigid criteria or specifically that adolescents’ perceived harms are overlooked. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Facebook imbalance ratio does not match its counts
MinorThe listed non-cyberbullying and cyberbullying counts give a ratio of about 15.06:1, not 10000:1.
Reported 10000 · recomputed 15.062386
“| non-cyberbullying | 33,077 | 93.8% | 10000:1 | high class imbalance | [84] |”
Social-media users are not 61% of the stated population
MinorDividing 4.95 billion users by a population of 7.888 billion gives about 62.75%, not 61%.
Reported 61 · recomputed 62.75355
“The total world's population is estimated to 7.888 billion in 2024 and it shows that there are 4.95 billion active users of social media platforms which is equal to 61% of total population”
Table 6 F1 score exceeds its precision-recall upper bound
MinorThe traditional model's precision and recall average 0.72, whereas its reported F1 score is 0.97. An F1 score computed from those metrics cannot exceed their arithmetic mean.
Reported 0.97 · recomputed 0.72
“| Statistical | TF-IDF, N-grams, Lexicon | rule based and, character percentage | 0.96 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.97 | [112] |”
Table 2 F1 score exceeds its precision-recall upper bound
MinorFor the [48] row, the reported F1 score of 0.96 exceeds even the arithmetic mean of precision and recall, 0.87. An F1 score computed from those metrics cannot exceed that mean.
Reported 0.96 · recomputed 0.87
“| | BoW | SGD, MNB, and LR | 0.97 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.96 | [48] |”
Table 4 F1 score exceeds its precision-recall upper bound
MinorFor the [106] row, precision and recall average 0.83, yet the reported F1 score is 0.95. An F1 score computed from those metrics cannot exceed their arithmetic mean.
Reported 0.95 · recomputed 0.83
“| Supervised | GloVe | CNN, SVM | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.73 | 0.95 | [106] |”
Twitter class percentage does not match its counts
MinorThe three Twitter class counts total 15,054. The 10,000 instances classified as neither sexist nor racist therefore represent about 66.43%, not 68.4%.
Reported 68.4 · recomputed 66.427528
“| neither sexist nor racist | 10,000 | 68.4% |”
Twitter offensive-class ratio does not match its counts
MinorThe offensive and non-offensive counts give a ratio of about 1.18:1, not 10:1.
Reported 10 · recomputed 1.183718
“| non-offensive | 4,164 | 45.8% | 10:1 | low class imbalance | [91] |”
Future directions are called three aspects but six are named
MinorThe sentence says the future directions comprise three aspects, then names six.
“The future direction for advancing cyberbullying detection on social media platforms has been categorized into three aspects”
“Datasets, Languages, Impacts, Detection, Defense, and Mitigation or Protection.”
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Text Classification Algorithms: A Survey
Kowsari, K., Meimandi, K., Heidarysafa, M., Mendu, S., Barnes, L. E., & Brown, D. E. (2019) · Inf. · doi:10.3390/info10040150 · Cited by 1,605 · see citing works
School Bullying: Development and Some Important Challenges
Olweus, D. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516 · Cited by 1,406 · see citing works
The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024 · Cited by 940 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Versus Face-to-Face Bullying: A Theoretical and Conceptual Review
Dooley, J. J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182 · Cited by 790 · see citing works
Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. J. (2007) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.004 · Cited by 775 · see citing works
Cyber-Harassment: A Study of a New Method for an Old Behavior
Li, T. B. Q. (2005) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/8yqm-b04h-pg4d-bllh · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health
Nixon, C. (2014) · Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics · doi:10.2147/ahmt.s36456 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Automatic detection of cyberbullying in social media text
Hee, C. V., Jacobs, G., Emmery, C., Desmet, B., Lefever, E., Verhoeven, B., Pauw, G. D., Daelemans, W. M. P., & Hoste, V. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203794 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Text feature extraction based on deep learning: a review
Liang, H., Sun, X., Sun, Y., & Gao, Y. (2017) · EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking · doi:10.1186/s13638-017-0993-1 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Some Problems with Cyberbullying Research
Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.012 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., & Jackson, M. (2013) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034313479697 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
A survey on dataset quality in machine learning
Gong, Y., Liu, G., Xue, Y., Li, R., & Meng, L. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107268 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
A systematic review of hate speech automatic detection using natural language processing
Jahan, M. S., & Oussalah, M. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126232 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Definitions of bullying: Age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience.
Monks, C. P., & Smith, P. K. (2006) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1348/026151005x82352 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Approaches to automated detection of cyberbullying: A survey
Salawu, S., He, Y., & Lumsden, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2017.2761757 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Cyberbullying on social media platforms among university students in the United Arab Emirates
Abaido, G. M. (2019) · International Journal of Adolescence and Youth · doi:10.1080/02673843.2019.1669059 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Feature extraction for machine learning-based intrusion detection in IoT networks
Sarhan, M., Layeghy, S., Moustafa, N., Gallagher, M. R., & Portmann, M. (2022) · Digital Communications and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2022.08.012 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Cyberbullying detection solutions based on deep learning architectures
Iwendi, C., Srivastava, G., Khan, S., & Maddikunta, P. K. R. (2023) · Multimedia Systems · doi:10.1007/s00530-020-00701-5 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: typology of the phenomenon
Pyżalski, J. (2012) · Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties · doi:10.1080/13632752.2012.704319 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Cyberbullying detection for low-resource languages and dialects: Review of the state of the art
Mahmud, T., Ptaszynski, M. E., Eronen, J., & Masui, F. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103454 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Cyberbullying in Children and Youth: Implications for Health and Clinical Practice
Vaillancourt, T., Faris, R., & Mishna, F. (2017) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0706743716684791 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection on Social Networks Using Machine Learning Approaches
Islam, M. M., Uddin, M. A., Islam, L., Akter, A., Sharmin, S., & Acharjee, U. K. (2020) · IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE) · doi:10.1109/csde50874.2020.9411601 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Subramanian, M., Easwaramoorthy, S. V., Deepalakshmi, G., Cho, J., & Manikandan, G. (2023) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.038 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Mancosu, M., & Vegetti, F. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120940703 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Natarajan, Y., Chang, V. I. C., Gobinathan, B., Pinagapani, A., Kannan, S., Dhiman, G., & Rajan, A. R. (2021) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107186 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection
Hasan, M. T., Hossain, M. A. E., Mukta, M. S. H., Akter, A., Ahmed, M., & Islam, S. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15050179 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Schulz, A. M., & Roessler, P. (2012) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds022 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
An application to detect cyberbullying using machine learning and deep learning techniques
Raj, M., Singh, S., Solanki, K., & Selvanambi, R. (2022) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-022-01308-5 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection: An Ensemble Based Machine Learning Approach
Alam, K. S., Bhowmik, S., & Prosun, P. R. K. (2021) · 2021 Third International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV) · doi:10.1109/icicv50876.2021.9388499 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Social Media-Related Cybercrimes and Techniques for Their Prevention
Soomro, T. R., & Hussain, M. (2019) · Applied Computer Systems · doi:10.2478/acss-2019-0002 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Deep Learning Algorithm for Cyberbullying Detection
Al-Ajlan, M., & Ykhlef, M. (2018) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2018.090927 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Alonso, M. Á., Vilares, D., Gómez‐Rodríguez, C., & Vilares, J. (2013) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Karanikola, M. N. K., Lyberg, A. M., Holm, A. L., & Severinsson, E. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/4745791 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
When the Timeline Meets the Pipeline: A Survey on Automated Cyberbullying Detection
Elsafoury, F., Katsigiannis, S., Pervez, Z., & Ramzan, N. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3098979 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Teng, T. H., & Varathan, K. D. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3275130 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Multilingual Cyberbullying Detection System
Pawar, R., & Raje, R. R. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology · doi:10.1109/eit.2019.8833846 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
A multi-platform dataset for detecting cyberbullying in social media
Van Bruwaene, D., Huang, Q., & Inkpen, D. (2020) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-020-09488-3 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Deep Learning Approaches for Cyberbullying Detection and Classification on Social Media
Neelakandan, S., Sridevi, M., Chandrasekaran, S., Murugeswari, K., Pundir, A. K. S., Sridevi, R., & Thamineni, B. L. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/2163458 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Multilingual cyberbullying detection system: Detecting cyberbullying in Arabic content
Haidar, B. R., Chamoun, M., & Serhrouchni, A. (2017) · Cyber Security in Networking Conference (CSNet) · doi:10.1109/csnet.2017.8242005 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Emmery, C., Verhoeven, B., Pauw, G. D., Jacobs, G., Hee, C. V., Lefever, E., Desmet, B., Hoste, V., & Daelemans, W. M. P. (2020) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-020-09509-1 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Kumar, A., & Sachdeva, N. (2020) · Multimedia Systems · doi:10.1007/s00530-020-00672-7 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Detecting Arabic Cyberbullying Tweets Using Machine Learning
Alduailaj, A. M., & Belghith, A. (2023) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make5010003 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Cyber Bullying Detection on Social Media using Machine Learning
Desai, A., Kalaskar, S., Kumbhar, O. S., & Dhumal, R. (2021) · ITM Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/itmconf/20214003038 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Cyberbullying detection using deep transfer learning
Roy, P. K., & Mali, F. U. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-022-00772-z · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Session-based cyberbullying detection in social media: A survey
Yi, P., & Zubiaga, A. (2023) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100250 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Identification System Based Deep Learning Algorithms
Aldhyani, T. H. H., Al-Adhaileh, M. H., & Alsubari, S. N. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11203273 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection With Fairness Constraints
Gencoglu, O. (2021) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2020.3032461 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Cyber Victimization Is Associated With Eating Disorder Psychopathology in Adolescents
Marco, J. H., & Irún, M. P. T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00987 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Weakly Supervised Cyberbullying Detection Using Co-Trained Ensembles of Embedding Models
Raisi, E., & Huang, B. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam.2018.8508240 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection Based on Emotion
Al-Hashedi, M., Soon, L.-K., Goh, H.-N., Lim, A. H. L., & Siew, E.-G. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3280556 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Modeling temporal patterns of cyberbullying detection with hierarchical attention networks
Cheng, L., Guo, R., Silva, Y. N., Hall, D., & Liu, H. (2021) · ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science · doi:10.1145/3441141 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Barlett, C. P., Seyfert, L. W., Simmers, M. M., Hsueh Hua Chen, V., Cavalcanti, J. G., Krahé, B., Suzuki, K., Warburton, W. A., Wong, R. Y. M., Pimentel, C. E., et al. (2021) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21923 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Cyber-Syndrome and its Formation, Classification, Recovery and Prevention
Ning, H., Dhelim, S., Bouras, M. A., Khelloufi, A., & Ullah, A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2848286 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence-Enabled Cyberbullying-Free Online Social Networks in Smart Cities
Al-Marghilani, A. (2022) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · doi:10.1007/s44196-022-00063-y · Cited by 38 · see citing works
The Use of a Large Language Model for Cyberbullying Detection
Ogunleye, B., & Dharmaraj, B. (2023) · Analytics · doi:10.3390/analytics2030038 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
A Deep Dive into Multilingual Hate Speech Classification
Aluru, S. S., Mathew, B., Saha, P., & Mukherjee, A. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67670-4_26 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection in Social Networks: Artificial Intelligence Approach
Azeez, N. A., Idiakose, S. O., Onyema, C. J., & der Vyver, C. V. (2021) · Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility · doi:10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.1046 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Building towards Automated Cyberbullying Detection: A Comparative Analysis
Al-Harigy, L. M., Al-Nuaim, H. A., Moradpoor, N., & Tan, Z. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/4794227 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Exploring Word Embedding Techniques to Improve Sentiment Analysis of Software Engineering Texts
Biswas, E., Vijay‐Shanker, K., & Pollock, L. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr.2019.00020 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Instagram-Based Benchmark Dataset for Cyberbullying Detection in Arabic Text
ALBayari, R., & Abdallah, S. (2022) · Data · doi:10.3390/data7070083 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The Impact of Cyberbullying and Cyber Harassment on Academic Achievement
Egeberg, G. C., Thorvaldsen, S., & Rønning, J. A. (2016) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-648-4_11 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Assessing Text Classification Methods for Cyberbullying Detection on Social Media Platforms
Philipo, A. G., Sarwatt, D. S., Ding, J., Daneshmand, M., & Ning, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3588728 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationDepartment of Computer Science, A. I. U.-B., Sultan, T., Jahan, N., Basak, R., Jony, M. S. A., & Nabil, R. H. (2023) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications · doi:10.5815/ijisa.2023.02.01 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Unsupervised Detection of Violent Content in Arabic Social Media
Abdelfatah, K. E., Terejanu, G., & Alhelbawy, A. (2017) · doi:10.5121/csit.2017.70401 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A Review of Automated Detection Methods for Cyberbullying
Mahlangu, T., Tu, C., & Owolawi, P. A. (2018) · International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications · doi:10.1109/iconic.2018.8601278 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Iqbal, S., & Jami, H. (2022) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-022-00689-0 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection using Natural Language Processing
Rahman, M. H. U. (2022) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2022.43683 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Kumar, Y., Huang, K., Perez, A., Yang, G., Li, J. J., Morreale, P. A., Kruger, D., & Jiang, R. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13173431 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
A Review of Deep Learning Models for Detecting Cyberbullying on Social Media Networks
Batani, J., Mbunge, E., Muchemwa, B., Gaobotse, G., Gurajena, C., Fashoto, S. G., Kavu, T. D., & Dandajena, K. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09073-8_46 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Aizenkot, D., & Kashy‐Rosenbaum, G. (2020) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2020-3-6 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Social Media's Toxic Comments Detection Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques
Rachidi, R., Ouassil, M. A., Errami, M., Cherradi, B., Hamida, S., & Silkan, H. (2023) · International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET) · doi:10.1109/iraset57153.2023.10153015 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Data-Efficient Strategies for Expanding Hate Speech Detection into Under-Resourced Languages
Röttger, P., Nozza, D., Bianchi, F., & Hovy, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.383 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Sexuality, gender and culturally diverse interpretations of cyberbullying
Sheanoda, V., Bussey, K., & Jones, T. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211055366 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Detecting Kids Cyberbullying Using Transfer Learning Approach: Transformer Fine-Tuning Models
Yafooz, W. M. S., Al-Dhaqm, A., & Alsaeedi, A. (2023) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21199-7_18 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ojeda, M., Espino, E., Elipe, P., & Rey, R. D. (2023) · Comunicar · doi:10.3916/c75-2023-02 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Smith, P. K., Görzig, A., & Robinson, S. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315110554-4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Detecting Cyber Bullying on Twitter using Support Vector Machine
Dedeepya, P., Sowmya, P., Saketh, T. D., Sruthi, P., Abhijit, P., & Praveen, S. P. (2023) · 2023 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS) · doi:10.1109/icais56108.2023.10073658 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Shielding against online harm: A survey on text analysis to prevent cyberbullying
Mishra, A., Sinha, S., & George, C. P. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108241 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
CYBERBULLYING IN THE LIGHT OF CHALLENGES OF SCHOOL-BASED PREVENTION
Tomczyk, Ł., & Włoch, A. (2019) · International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education · doi:10.5937/ijcrsee1903013t · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Content Effects: Violence in the Media
Prot, S., Anderson, C. A., Barlett, C. P., Coyne, S. M., & Saleem, M. (2017) · The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects · doi:10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0121 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Fairness across network positions in cyberbullying detection algorithms
Singh, V. K., & Hofenbitzer, C. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3341161.3342949 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Analysis of Tweets for Cyberbullying Detection
Mathur, S. A., Isarka, S., Dharmasivam, B., & C. D., J. (2023) · 2023 Third International Conference on Secure Cyber Computing and Communication (ICSCCC) · doi:10.1109/icsccc58608.2023.10176416 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
THE PSYCHOSOCIAL EFFECTS OF SOCIAL MEDIA CYBERBULLYING ON STUDENTS IN SELECTED AFRICAN COUNTRIES
Chukwuere, P. C., Chukwuere, J. E., & Adom, D. (2021) · Acta Informatica Malaysia · doi:10.26480/aim.02.2021.62.70 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Hate Speech Detection using OpenAI and GPT-3
Gupta, S. K. (2022) · International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering · doi:10.46338/ijetae0522_15 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cyber Bullying Detection using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Text Analytics
Khang Hsien, Y., Arabee Abdul Salam, Z., & Kasinathan, V. (2022) · 2022 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing and Electrical Circuits and Electronics (ICDCECE) · doi:10.1109/icdcece53908.2022.9792931 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Farag, N., El-Seoud, S. A., McKee, G., & Hassan, G. (2019) · International Conference on Software and Information Engineering (ICSIE) · doi:10.1145/3328833.3328869 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Al-Harigy, L. M., Al-Nuaim, H. A., Moradpoor, N., & Tan, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-024-00607-9 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Sustainable AI: Emerging Trends, Impacts, and Future Challenges
Philipo, A. G., Ning, H., Sarwatt, D. S., Mohamed, J. A., Yusufu, A. S., Shi, F., Urenje, S., & Ding, J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing · doi:10.1109/tsusc.2025.3611272 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationGamal, D., Alfonse, M., Jiménez-Zafra, S. M., & Aref, M. (2023) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc7020058 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A lexical database for public textual cyberbullying detection
Power, A., Keane, A., Nolan, B., & O’Neill, B. (2017) · LFE. Revista de lenguas para fines específicos/Revista de lenguas para fines específicos · doi:10.20420/rlfe.2017.341 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Sentiment-Enhanced Cyberbullying Detection Models on Social Media Platforms
Philipo, A. G., Ding, J., Sarwatt, D. S., Mohamed, J. A., Yusufu, A. S., Daneshmand, M., & Ning, H. (2025) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3766075 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationA Novel Multimodal Hybrid Classifier Based Cyberbullying Detection for Social Media Platform
Suhas Bharadwaj, R., Kuzhalvaimozhi, S., & Vedavathi, N. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21438-7_57 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Firefly-CDDL: A Firefly-Based Algorithm for Cyberbullying Detection Based on Deep Learning
Al-Ajlan, M., & Ykhlef, M. (2023) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2023.033753 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Unsupervised Hybrid approaches for Cyberbullying Detection in Instagram
Abishak, I., Kabilash, M., Ramesh, R., Sheeba, J. I., & Pradeep, S. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2021921191 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A Comparative Study of Cyberbullying Detection in Social Media for the Last Five Years
Haydar, N., & Dhannoon, B. N. (2023) · Journal of Al-Nahrain University-Science · doi:10.22401/anjs.26.2.08 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Adolescent Cyberbullying: A Worldwide Concern
Hong, J. S., Navarro, R., & Wright, M. F. (2024) · Advances in information quality and management · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch017 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Plichta, P., Barlińska, J., & Pyżalski, J. (2018) · Interdyscyplinarne Konteksty Pedagogiki Specjalnej · doi:10.14746/ikps.2018.20.05 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Multilingual Cyberbullying Detector (CD) Application for Nigerian Pidgin and Igbo Language Corpus
Okoloegbo, C. A., Eze, U. F., Chukwudebe, G. A., & Nwokonkwo, O. C. (2022) · Information Technology for Education and Development (ITED) · doi:10.1109/ited56637.2022.10051345 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Njovangwa, G., & Justo, G. N. (2021) · Tanzania Journal of Science · doi:10.4314/tjs.v47i4.2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection in Code-Mixed Languages: Dataset and Techniques
Maity, K., Saha, S., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2022) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr56361.2022.9956390 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Scott, J., & Barlett, C. (2023) · Children · doi:10.3390/children10071156 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection Using Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
Alkasassbeh, M. S., Almomani, A., Aldweesh, A. Y., Al–Qerem, A., Alauthman, M., Nahar, K. M. O., & Mago, B. (2024) · International Conference on Cyber Resilience (ICCR) · doi:10.1109/iccr61006.2024.10533166 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Impacts of Cyberbullying and Its Solutions
Ju, B. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media · doi:10.54254/2753-7048/29/20231521 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Cyberbullying in the Digital Age: A Common Social Phenomenon
Tas’adi, R., Mudjiran, Gistituati, N., et al. (2020) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.201209.218 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Detection of Cyberbullying on User Tweets and Wikipedia Text using Machine Learning
Venu, V. S., Hariharan, S., Reddy, S. M., Kotha, V. V. R., Muthyala, S. S. R., & Kansal, S. (2023) · International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC) · doi:10.1109/icaaic56838.2023.10140252 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection on Social Media
Bawane, V., Gaupale, V., Wakalkar, A., Rathod, K., & Shelke, P. S. (2023) · International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Science · doi:10.46335/ijies.2023.8.7.6 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Improved Model for Identifying the Cyberbullying based on Tweets of Twitter
Samalo, D., Martin, R., & Utama, D. N. (2023) · Informatica · doi:10.31449/inf.v47i6.4534 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ethical Considerations in AI-Generated Content on Social Media
Medhat, M., Ayoub, L. W., Daher, M., & Mohamed, K. M. (2025) · Studies in Big Data · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-83911-5_52 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Cyberbullying: Legal and Ethical Implications, Challenges and Opportunities for Policy Development
A. Angwaomaodoko, E. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24apr108 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A lexical database for public textual cyberbullying detection
Power, A., Keane, A., Nolan, B., et al. (2017) · LFE. Revista de lenguas para fines específicos/Revista de lenguas para fines específicos · doi:10.20420/rlfe.2017.177 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Cyberbullying in the educational context
Ramos Galarza, C., Bolaños Pasquel, M., Cruz Cárdenas, J., & Cedillo, P. (2022) · AHFE International · doi:10.54941/ahfe1002721 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, solutions and recommendations are proposed to detect, prevent, and monitor cyberbullying on social media platforms.”
Mestci, S., Gökkaya, F., & Denk, Z. A. (2022) · Advances in social networking and online communities book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5426-8.ch026 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Role of Religiosity and Spiritual Meaningfullness towards Cyberbullying Behavior
Safaria, T., & Bashori, K. (2021) · Journal of Educational Health and Community Psychology · doi:10.12928/jehcp.v10i2.20602 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Differences in Cultural Perspectives on Cyberbullying-Related Words
Beng, K. Y., & Hua, T. K. (2019) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i10/6444 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Online Harassment Detection using Machine Learning
Ahirwar, R., Ajay, M., Sathyabalan, N., & Lakshmi, K. (2022) · International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) · doi:10.1109/icict54344.2022.9850516 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kahate, S. A., & Raut, A. D. (2023) · 2023 4th International Conference on Innovative Trends in Information Technology (ICITIIT) · doi:10.1109/icitiit57246.2023.10068711 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A Survey on Cyberbullying Predictive Model using Deep Learning Techniques
Maragathavalli, P., Thanushri, A., Gayathri, S. N. L., Anjana, B., & Asok, H. (2024) · Journal of Trends in Computer Science and Smart Technology · doi:10.36548/jtcsst.2024.2.001 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cyber nation (Or, La Patria Cibernetica ) 1 *
Trigo, A. (2003) · Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/13569320305838 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Detection using Deep Learning Models in Bengali Language
Beniwal, R., Jha, S., Mehta, S., & Dhiman, R. (2023) · International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT) · doi:10.1109/conit59222.2023.10205775 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Al-Harigy, L. M., Al-Nuaim, H. A., Moradpoor, N., & Tan, Z. (2022) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) · doi:10.1109/cicn56167.2022.10008274 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sociological dimensions of cyberbullying: essence, consequences, and coping strategies
Korzhov, H., & Yenin, M. (2022) · Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing · doi:10.15407/sociology2022.04.103 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Online behaviour, life stressors and profit-motivated cybercrime victimisation
Voce, I., & Morgan, A. (2023) · Australian Institute of Criminology eBooks · doi:10.52922/ti77062 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Overview of the HASOC Track 2024: Hate-Speech Identification in English and Bengali
Mandl, T., Ghosh, K., Raihan, M. N., Modha, S., Satapara, S., Gaur, T., Dave, Y., Zampieri, M., & Jaki, S. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation (FIRE) · doi:10.1145/3734947.3735664 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
An Automatic Method to Prevent and Classify Cyber Bullying Incidents Using Machine Learning Approach
Libina, M., Sasipriya, G., & Rajasekar, V. (2023) · International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (ICONSTEM) · doi:10.1109/iconstem56934.2023.10142513 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Diamanduros, T. D., & Downs, E. (2018) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5933-7.ch004 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Salazar, L. R., Garcia, N., Diego-Medrano, E., & Castillo, Y. (2020) · Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4912-4.ch014 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Imbalanced Dataset Analysis with Neural Network Model
Babu, M. C., & Pushpa, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-2612-1_9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Cyber Bullying Detection on Social Media Network
P, C., K, D., M, H., & J, K. (2023) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2023.51233 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cyberbully Detection Using Term Weighting Scheme and Naïve Bayes Classifier
Rabii, R. M., & Siraj, M. M. (2020) · International Journal of Innovative Computing · doi:10.11113/ijic.v10n1.254 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ethics is nothing other than reverence for life . . . and data
Schneider, S. F. (2023) · Journal of Data Protection & Privacy · doi:10.69554/mznc4549 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“After training the algorithms, the next step is to test their performance in classifying cyberbullying instances using evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.”
Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, U., Bezrukov, A., Yashkina, V., Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, U., Polishko, N., Alfred Nobel University, U., Budilova, O., & Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, U. (2023) · ASR: Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities · doi:10.12982/cmujasr.2023.020 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Chew, S. X., Liew, J. S. Y., Wan Ibrisam Fikry, W. A. L., & Ibrahim, N. F. (2022) · International Journal of Asian Language Processing · doi:10.1142/s2717554523500054 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Qais Faryadi. 2011. Cyber bullying and academic performance. International Journal Of Computational Engineering Research 1, 1 (2011), 2250–3005.
- Ujjwal Shrivastav, Prakash Srivastava, and Vikas Tripathi. 2023. A survey on cyberbullying detection techniques. In Proceedings of the 2023 10th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom). 628–633.
- 10.17148/ijarcce.2023.12681 · DOI
- Mr James Nambusi. 2018. Cyberbullying: Effect on work place production. Africa International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 2, 1 (2018), 24–39.
- Hannah Beghin. 2020. The Effects of Cyberbullying on Students and Schools. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education 12 2 (2020) 19–22.
- Kris Varjas, Jasmaine Talley, Joel Meyers, Leandra Parris, and Hayley Cutts. 2010. High school students’ perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: An exploratory study. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 11, 3 (2010), 269–273.
- Chutikarn Saengmas Kulabutr Komenkul and Amporn Puapradit. 2018. Effects of social network and cyberbullying on mental health in young adults in Thailand. In Proceedings of the RSU International Research Conference 2018. Rangsit University. 454–460. DOI:10.14458/RSU.res.2018.105 · DOI
- Sumera Batool Rabia Yousaf and Feroza Batool. 2017. Bullying in social media: An effect study of cyber bullying on the youth. Pakistan Journal of Criminology 9 4 (2017) 119–139.
- Nazanin Alavi, Taras Reshetukha, Eric Prost, Kristen Antoniak, Charmy Patel, Saad Sajid, and Dianne Groll. 2017. Relationship between bullying and suicidal behaviour in youth presenting to the emergency department. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 26, 2 (2017), 70–77.
- Claudia Canali Michele Colajanni and Riccardo Lancellotti. 2011. Data Acquisition in Social Networks: Issues and Proposals. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268360168. Accessed on 2024-05-03.
- Sweta Agrawal and Amit Awekar. 2018. Deep learning for detecting cyberbullying across multiple social media platforms. arXiv(2018), 1–12.
- M. Devi and M. Chitra Devi. 2018. Fuzzy based genetic operators for cyber bullying detection using social network data. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT) 3 3 (2018) 437–444.
- Ke-Li Chiu, Annie Collins, and Rohan Alexander. 2021. Detecting hate speech with GPT-3. arXiv(2021), 1–29.
- Ulrik Brandes, Chandan Reddy, and Andrea Tagarelli. 2018. Are they our brothers? analysis and detection of religious hate speech in the arabic twittersphere. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).69–76.
- Mara Hamlett Grace Powell Yasin N. Silva and Deborah Hall. 2022. A Labeled Dataset for Investigating Cyberbullying Content Patterns in Instagram. Retrieved from www.aaai.org. Accessed on 2024-05-03.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing Text Classification Methods for Cyberbullying Detection on Social Media Platforms
Philipo, A. G., Sarwatt, D. S., Ding, J., Daneshmand, M., & Ning, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3588728 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationSentiment-Enhanced Cyberbullying Detection Models on Social Media Platforms
Philipo, A. G., Ding, J., Sarwatt, D. S., Mohamed, J. A., Yusufu, A. S., Daneshmand, M., & Ning, H. (2025) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3766075 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationCombating Cyberbullying With Generative AI
Rajeshwari, B. S., & Inbaraj, D. (2025) · Advances in social networking and online communities book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0543-1.ch012 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
HyVADSVM: Hybrid VADER-SVM and GridSearchCV Optimization for Enhancing Cyberbullying Detection
Ernawati, S., Frieyadie, F., & Yulia, E. R. (2024) · Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC) · doi:10.18196/jrc.v6i1.24385 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Philipo, A. G., Sarwatt, D. S., Ning, H., Shi, F., Daneshmand, M., & Ding, J. (2025) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.174060095.52642988/v1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationPrabakaran, S., Muthunambu, N. K., & Jeyaraman, N. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3695251 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hybrid Deep Learning Techniques for Improved Anomaly Detection in IoT Environments
Mohammad, H. A. (2024) · Wasit Journal of Computer and Mathematics Science · doi:10.31185/wjcms.323 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hate Speech Sentiment Detection with Topic Modeling-Based Feature Engineering
Choudhary, D. D., Reddy, M. S., & Kumar, M. A. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14531-4_26 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kumar, M., Shuja, M., Ahmed, B., Gera, T., Thakur, D. S., & Bhardwaj, V. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2716-7.ch014 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Examining Topics and Trends in Cyber Aggression and Abuse: A Latent Dirichlet Allocation Analysis
Yengejeh, A. A., & Tang, L. (2026) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math14060932 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Wulandari, M., Dewi, I. K., Hasibuan, R. P., Sugito, E., Davici, L., Hernandes, M. R., & Indriani, N. (2026) · Easta Journal of Innovative Community Services · doi:10.58812/ejincs.v4i03.618 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Smith, E. J., Rai, R., Scase, M. O., & Wilson, A. D. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1746672
“This is particularly relevant given that cyberbullying detection models and intervention tools are often trained around the rigid and subjective cyberbullying criteria, potentially overlooking experiences that adolescents perceive as harmful (124, 125).”
Rawat, H., Rawat, A., Muzumdar, P., Gehlot, S., & Dangi, C. S. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2716-7.ch002
Beyond Hate Speech: A Synthetic Conversational Dataset for Detecting Subtle Cyberbullying
Jangam, A. G., Avaiya, U., Sawarkar, H., Patil, P., & Ghane, S. (2025) · IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon) · doi:10.1109/punecon67554.2025.11377671
Odeh, A., Hassan, O. A., Taleb, A. A., Aboshgifa, A., & Belhaj, N. (2026) · IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.11591/ijai.v15.i1.pp86-96
Detecting racism in the digital age: a survey of datasets and algorithms
Miqdadi, I. E., Hourri, S., Hayati, A., Namir, Y., Idrysy, F. Z. E., & Kharroubi, J. (2026) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-026-09913-z
Monteiro, A., Pais, S., Lashgari, F., & Pourvahab, M. (2025) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw69685.2025.00153
Integrating Emotional Intelligence Into Artificial Intelligence for 21st Century Learners
Shin, S., & Hong, H. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/407438
Sathwik, G., Sai, K. P. R., Varma, S. S. V., Satheesh, V., & Shirisha, D. K. (2026) · Iconic Research and Engineering Journals · doi:10.64388/irev9i10-1716912
Multimodal Cyberbullying Detection on Social Media Using LLMs
Catalano, C., Chezzi, A., Lupo, S., Catalano, A. A., Vadacca, R., & Mainetti, L. (2026) · International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems · doi:10.4018/ijswis.409891
Enhanced Dense Classification Head for BERT-Based Cyberbullying Detection
Pallavi, N. R., & Sunitha, M. (2026) · Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research · doi:10.48084/etasr.17172
Vetal, N., & Vasgi, B. P. (2026) · International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology · doi:10.25258/ijddt.16.58s.22
Cyber bullying detection on social media: Insights from TF-IDF and LSTM approaches
Reddy, Y., Reddy, A. V. G., Ranjith, Thirupathi, G., Pasha, M. A., & Reddy, P. K. T. (2026) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0342341
Adebayo, O. J., Mohammed, Y. A., Isah, A. O., Anyaora, P. C., Fasola, O. O., Uduimoh, A. A., & Baba, M. (2026) · Digital Technologies Research and Applications · doi:10.54963/dtra.v5i3.1767
Cyberbullying as social labeling in digital identity construction
Aini, R., & Mulyana, D. (2026) · Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi · doi:10.24198/jkk.v14i1.70147
Kritika, E. (2026) · International Journal of Digital Law and Governance · doi:10.1515/ijdlg-2026-0011
Enhancing Cyberbullying Detection in Social Media through Attention-Based Deep Neural Networks
Zedan, M. J. M., Ardhana, E. R., Abdani, S. R., & Zulkifley, M. A. (2026) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2026.087996
Online victimisation in digital environments: A study on social media users
Özen, Ü., Bahar, B., & Alkan, Ö. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107899
Philipo, A. G., Ding, J., Sarwatt, D. S., & Ning, H. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2026.104820
Self-citationZhidebayeva, A., Toktarova, A., Abdrakhmanov, R., Berkimbayev, K., Bekbolat, M., & Tolep, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1926150
- Authors
- Philipo, A. G., Sarwatt, D. S., Ding, J., Daneshmand, M., & Ning, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
- Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2026-02-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1-35
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W4403749574
- Semantic Scholar
- 55740b9b2c21cb7d10a5db65f0b60d8f71983265
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 129
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- European Celtic+ and Swedish Vinnova (C2022/1-3)
- Knowledge Foundation, Sweden, through the Human-Centered Intelligent Realities (20220068)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- cyberbullying detection, social media, datasets, evaluation metrics, machine learning, deep learning, large language models, adolescents, online harassment, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review