CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38Neutrino Physics ResearchQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Neutrino oscillations in discrete-time quantum walk framework

Open access
Mallick, Arindam, Mandal, Sanjoy, Chandrashekar, C. M.·2017·The European Physical Journal C
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4636-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Here we present neutrino oscillation in the framework of quantum walks. Starting from a one spatial dimensional discrete-time quantum walk we present a scheme of evolutions that will simulate neutrino oscillation. The set of quantum walk parameters which is required to reproduce the oscillation probability profile obtained in both, long range and short range neutrino experiment is explicitly presented. Our scheme to simulate three-generation neutrino oscillation from quantum walk evolution operators can be physically realized in any low energy experimental set-up with access to control a single six-level system, a multiparticle three-qubit or a qubit–qutrit system. We also present the entanglement between spins and position space, during neutrino propagation that will quantify the wave function delocalization around instantaneous average position of the neutrino. This work will contribute towards understanding neutrino oscillation in the framework of the quantum information perspective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4636-9

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The correspondence between DQWs and the dynamics of Dirac particles suggests that the QWs formalism is a viable approach to reproduce a variety of phenomena underpinned by Dirac particle dynamics in both the high- and low-energy regime.

    “The correspondence between DQWs and the dynamics of Dirac particles suggests that the QWs formalism is as a viable approach to reproduce a variety of phenomena underpinned by Dirac particle dynamics in both the high- and low-energy regime22,39,43.”

    From Quantum walks and Dirac cellular automata on a programmable trapped-ion quantum computer (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction says discrete-time quantum walks can simulate Dirac dynamics and proposes using low-energy qubit systems to simulate high-energy phenomena. But the Numerical simulation section says the walk produces Dirac dynamics only when its parameters are small; the paper does not establish the broader claim that it reproduces a variety of Dirac-particle phenomena across both high- and low-energy regimes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. W. Pauli, Letter to the "radio actives" in Tabingen, December 1930, reproduced as "On the Earlier and More Recent History of the Neutrino" in Cambridge Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 14(1), 1-22 (2000)
  2. S. Fukuda et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 539, 179 (2002). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0370269302020907, arXiv:hep-ex/0205075 · arXiv
  3. B. Pontecorvo, Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 429 (1957). http://inspirehep. net/record/2884, (Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33, 549 (1957))
  4. R.P. Feynman, Found. Phys. 16, 507-531 (1986). http://link. springer.com/article/10.1007
  5. R. Blatt, C.F. Roos, Nature Phys. 8, 277-284 (2012). http://www. nature.com/nphys/journal/v8/n4/abs/nphys2252.html
  6. A. Aspuru-Guzik, P. Walther, Nature Phys. 8, 285-291 (2012). http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v8/n4/full/nphys2253.html
  7. A.K. Alok, S. Banerjee, S. Uma Sankar, arXiv:1411.5536v1 · arXiv
  8. S. Banerjee, A.K. Alok, R. Srikanth, B.C. Hiesmayr, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 487 (2015). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140
  9. B. Kayser, arXiv:hep-ph/0506165 · arXiv
  10. Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962). http://ptp.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/5/870
  11. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, arXiv:1512.06856 [hep-ph] · arXiv
  12. K.R. Parthasarathy, J. Appl. Probab. 25, 151-166 (1988). http:// www.jstor.org/stable/3214153
  13. Y. Fukuda et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 501, 418 (2003). https://inspirehep.net/record/607144/
  14. C. Noh, B.M. Rodrguez-Lara, D.G. Angelakis, J. Phys. 14, 033028 (2012). http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/14/ 3/033028/meta · DOI
  15. C. Giunti, arXiv:hep-ph/0409230 · arXiv
  16. A. Mallick, S. Mandal, C.M. Chandrashekar, arXiv:1604.04233v1 · arXiv
  17. D.V. Zhuridov, arXiv:1203.2764 [hep-ph] · arXiv
  18. C.M. Chandrashekar. arXiv:1212.5984 · arXiv
  19. G. Di Molfetta, A. Perez, New J. Phys. 18, 103038 (2016). doi:10. 1088/1367-2630/18/10/103038/pdf · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Mallick, A., Mandal, S., & Chandrashekar, C. M.
Affiliations
Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Mallick, Arindam
  • Mandal, Sanjoy
  • Chandrashekar, C. M.
ORCID
Venue
The European Physical Journal C
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-02
Volume
77
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1434-6044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-6052
DOI
10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4636-9
OpenAlex
W2574433003
Cited by
37
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The European Physical Journal C (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Neutrino Physics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
neutrino oscillations, discrete-time quantum walks, three-qubit systems, qubit-qutrit systems, wave function delocalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review