Cited by 82Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

Critical Behavior of Black Hole Formation in a Scalar Wave Collapse

Open access
Oshiro, Y., Nakamura, K., Tomimatsu, A.·1994·Progress of Theoretical Physics

Abstract

We present a self-similar model of spherically symmetric collapse of a massless scalar field with a parameter p. The black hole formation is explicitly shown to occur only in the strong-field implosin of p > 1. The field evolution in the critical limit p →1 is compared with numerical results found by Choptuik.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1143/ptp/91.6.1265

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A class of CSS solutions for the Einstein-scalar system was first introduced by Roberts in the context of cosmic censorship, and later rediscovered by Brady and by Oshiro, Nakamura, and Tomimatsu in the study of critical collapse.

    “A class of such CSS solutions for the Einstein-scalar system (2.2) was first introduced by Roberts in the context of cosmic censorship [122], and later rediscovered by Brady and by Oshiro, Nakamura, and Tomimatsu in the study of critical collapse [126,282].”

    From Unveiling horizons in quantum critical collapse (2026) · cites this paper as [282]

  • One cannot simply read off the power-law scaling from the total mass with marginally non-zero α (which would suggest δ = 0.5).

    “As a result, one cannot simply read off the power-law scaling from the total mass with marginally non-zero α (which would suggest δ = 0.5) [126,282].”

    From Unveiling horizons in quantum critical collapse (2026) · cites this paper as [282]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oshiro, Y., Nakamura, K., & Tomimatsu, A.
Affiliations
Nagoya University (JP)
Venue
Progress of Theoretical Physics
Published
1994-06-01
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
1265-1270
ISSN
  • 0033-068X (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-4081
OpenAlex
W2028663900
Cited by
82
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress of Theoretical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
black hole formation, massless scalar field, self-similar solutions, spherical collapse, critical phenomena, implosion, strong-field limit, critical exponents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review