Cited by 164Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows

Uniqueness and Non-Uniqueness of Static Vacuum Black Holes in Higher Dimensions

Open access
Gibbons, Gary W., Ida, Daisuke, Shiromizu, Tetsuya·2002·Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement

Abstract

We prove the uniqueness theorem for asymptotically flat static vacuum black hole solutions in higher-dimensional space-times. We also construct infinitely many non-asymptotically flat regular static black holes on the same space-time manifold with the same spherical topology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1143/ptps.148.284

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Birkhoff's theorem in higher dimensions is valid for a wider class of metrics which include spacetimes with Böhm metrics existing on base manifolds topologically spheres or products thereof.

    “Hence, Birkhoff's theorem in higher dimensions is valid for a wider class of metrics which in particular include spacetimes with the Böhm metrics existing on base manifolds which are topologically spheres or products thereoffoot_0 [1][2][3].”

    From Birkhoff’s theorem in Lovelock gravity for general base manifolds (2015) · cites this paper as [2]

    Section 3 (page unavailable) describes higher-dimensional, non-asymptotically flat static black-hole solutions obtained by using Böhm metrics in place of round sphere metrics. It does not establish the claimed extension of Birkhoff’s theorem or state that the Böhm metrics occur on products of spheres. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, Ann. of Phys. 172 (1986), 304.
  2. P. C. Argyres, S. Dimopoulos and J. March-Russell, Phys. Lett. B 441 (1998), 96.
  3. R. Emparan, G. T. Horowitz and R. C. Myers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000), 499.
  4. S. Dimupoulos and G. Landsberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001), 161602.
  5. S. B. Giddings and S. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002), 056010.
  6. W. Israel, Phys. Rev. 164 (1967), 1776.
  7. G. L. Bunting and A. K. M. Masood-ul-Alam, Gen. Relat. Grav. 19 (1987), 147.
  8. B. Carter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 (1971), 331.
  9. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 25 (1972), 152.
  10. D. C. Robinson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975), 905.
  11. M. Heusler, Black Hole Uniqueness Theorems (Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 1996).
  12. R. Emparan and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), 101101.
  13. F. R. Tangherlini, Nuovo Cim. 27 (1963), 636.
  14. S. Hwang, Geometriae Dedicata 71 (1998), 5.
  15. G. W. Gibbons, D. Ida and T. Shiromizu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002), 041101;
  16. Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002), 044010.
  17. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 80 (1981), 381.
  18. M. M. Taylor-Robinson, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997), 4822.
  19. C. Bohm, Invent. Math. 134 (1998), 145.
  20. R. L. Bishop, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1963), 363.
  21. S. Gubser, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999), 025006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibbons, G. W., Ida, D., & Shiromizu, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
Venue
Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement
Published
2002
Volume
148
Pages
284-290
ISSN
0375-9687 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963317489
Cited by
164
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 22
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Keywords
uniqueness theorem, static black holes, higher-dimensional spacetime, asymptotically flat spacetimes, regular black holes, non-uniqueness, spherical topology, static spacetimes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review