Birkhoff’s theorem in Lovelock gravity for general base manifolds
Open accessAbstract
We extend the Birkhoff’s theorem in Lovelock gravity for arbitrary base manifolds using an elementary method. In particular, it is shown that any solution of the form of a warped product of a two-dimensional transverse space and an arbitrary base manifold must be static. Moreover, the field equations restrict the base manifold such that all the non-trivial intrinsic Lovelock tensors of the base manifold are constants, which can be chosen arbitrarily, and the metric in the transverse space is determined by a single function of a spacelike coordinate which satisfies an algebraic equation involving the constants characterizing the base manifold along with the coupling constants.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper extends Birkhoff’s theorem in Lovelock gravity to arbitrary base manifolds, showing that for generic coupling constants any warped-product solution with a two-dimensional transverse space must be static. The base manifold is constrained to have constant intrinsic Lovelock tensors and Euler invariants, while the transverse metric is determined by an algebraic equation generalizing Wheeler’s polynomial.
Key findings
- For generic coupling constants, any solution of the form warped product of a two-dimensional transverse space and an arbitrary base manifold must be static; the metric reduces to a static form with a single function \(g(r)\) of the spacelike coordinate.
- The field equations restrict the base manifold so that all non-trivial intrinsic Lovelock tensors and Euler invariants up to order \(k\) are constants, which can be chosen arbitrarily but then enter the metric function.
- The transverse metric function \(g(r)\) satisfies an algebraic equation, Eq. (8), involving the constants characterizing the base manifold and the Lovelock coupling constants; this generalizes Wheeler’s polynomial.
- The analysis is split into cases \(D > 2k+2\), \(D = 2k+1\), and \(D = 2k+2\); the algebraic equation can be solved explicitly for \(g(r)\) only up to \(k=4\) for generic coupling constants.
Methods
- Theoretical/mathematical study in Lovelock gravity; no empirical data or sample are used.
- Starts from a \(D\)-dimensional warped-product metric with an arbitrary \((D-2)\)-dimensional base manifold and derives reduced field equations in compact form.
- Solves the reduced equations using a Pexider-type functional equation and Wronskian rank arguments, with case distinctions depending on dimension relative to the Lovelock order \(k\).
Limitations
- The paper states that for certain choices of coupling constants the field equations reduce to an under-determined set and Birkhoff’s theorem is no longer valid; these choices may allow non-static solutions, and a complete classification of these “degenerate” cases is left for future work.
- The paper states that the algebraic equation (8) can be solved explicitly for \(g(r)\) only up to \(k=4\) for generic values of the coupling constants.
- Evident from the text: the main result assumes generic coupling constants, so degenerate cases are excluded and no complete classification is provided.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
6 of 13 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisereasoning
Birkhoff's theorem in higher dimensions is valid for a wider class of metrics which include spacetimes with Böhm metrics existing on base manifolds topologically spheres or products thereof.
“Hence, Birkhoff's theorem in higher dimensions is valid for a wider class of metrics which in particular include spacetimes with the Böhm metrics existing on base manifolds which are topologically spheres or products thereoffoot_0 [1][2][3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Böhm, 1998, Invent. Math. source
- cites [2] Gibbons, 2003, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. source
Section 3 (page unavailable) describes higher-dimensional, non-asymptotically flat static black-hole solutions obtained by using Böhm metrics in place of round sphere metrics. It does not establish the claimed extension of Birkhoff’s theorem or state that the Böhm metrics occur on products of spheres. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [3] Gibbons, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
The concluding discussion (p. 4, around Eq. 40) says that replacing a round-sphere metric with Böhm Einstein metrics yields non-asymptotically flat static black-hole solutions. It does not establish Birkhoff’s theorem for that wider class; it expressly leaves the uniqueness of black holes constructed from the same Böhm metric open. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Birkhoff's theorem also holds in Lovelock theory.
“Birkhoff's theorem also holds in Lovelock theory of gravity [4,5] which is a natural higher curvature generalization of Einstein's general relativity and retains the property that the field equations are of second order in the metric [6].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Zegers, 2005, J. Math. Phys. source
The theorem on p. 1 establishes a Birkhoff-type result for generic Lovelock field equations with spherical, planar, or hyperbolic symmetry. The qualification matters: the paper says fine-tuned Lovelock couplings can evade the theorem, so the unqualified claim is broader than its result. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [5] Deser, 2005, Class. Quantum Grav. source
- Findingreasoning
Any solution of Lovelock gravity of the form of a warped product of a two-dimensional transverse space and an arbitrary base manifold must be static.
“In particular, it is shown that any solution of the form of a warped product of a two-dimensional transverse space and an arbitrary base manifold must be static.”
- Also stated in: § 2. Staticity and reduced field equations · plain
“This implies that the general solution of the form (1) of the field equations (3) must be static and reduces to”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 2. Staticity and reduced field equations · plain
- Findingreasoning
The metric in the transverse space is determined by a single function of a spacelike coordinate which satisfies an algebraic equation involving the constants characterizing the base manifold along with the coupling constants.
“and the metric in the transverse space is determined by a single function of a spacelike coordinate which satisfies an algebraic equation involving the constants characterizing the base manifold along with the coupling constants.”
- Also stated in: § 4. Conclusion · boosted
“Using a simple method we have shown that for generic coupling constants, the transverse part of the metric is given in terms of a single function of the spacelike coordinate r which is determined by an algebraic equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4. Conclusion · boosted
- Findingreasoning
All Euler invariants of the base manifold must be constants.
“Moreover, since 1, 0 ˆ( ) = they all must also be constants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The constants alpha_n generally depend on the geometry of the base manifold.
“However, the constants n a ʼs generally depend on the geometry of the base manifold as we shall show now.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For the maximum multiplicity choice of coupling constants, the metric function is given by g(r) = r^2 U = ... const.
“Hence the metric function in this case is given by g r r U r r const. . D k k 2 2 2 1 ( ) ( ) ¯b g = - = + - --”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The algebraic equation (8) can be solved explicitly for g(r) only up to k=4 for generic values of the coupling constants.
“The algebraic equation (8) can be solved explicitly for g(r) only up to k 4 ¯= for generic values of the coupling constants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
All Euler invariants of the base manifold must be multiples of each other.
“In other words, all the Euler invariants of the base manifold must be multiples of each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In the maximum multiplicity case, the algebraic equation has a unique solution if and only if all coupling constants a_n and base constants alpha_n are related to parameters beta and gamma through specific relations.
“Furthermore, observing the highest order term in U, we infer that the equation has a unique solution if and only if the left hand side can be expressed as a U r . . n m k k m n ¯ a b g = - ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ Putting m k = we conclude that all the coupling constants a n and those characterizing the base manifold n a must be related to the parameters β and γ through the relations a a k k and , n n k k”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The field equations restrict the base manifold such that all non-trivial intrinsic Lovelock tensors of the base manifold are constants.
“Furthermore, the field equations are shown to dictate that all the Lovelock tensors and the Euler invariants up to order k ¯of the base manifold are constants, where k ¯is the highest order of the curvature terms in the action.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There can be at most k distinct solutions to equation (8) depending on the coupling constants a_n and the constants characterizing the base manifold alpha_n.
“There can be at most k ¯distinct solutions to the equation (8) depending on the coupling constants a n and the constants characterizing the base manifold . n a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
For a non-trivial solution of the functional equation to exist, the sets of functions {f_k(x)} and {g_k(y)} must be linearly dependent.
“The basic idea is that for a non-trivial solution to exist, the sets of functions f x k { ( )} and g y k { ( )} must be linearly dependent sets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Aczél, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [20] Sutô, 1914, Tôhoku Math. J.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Generically the constants alpha_n characterizing the base manifold, along with the coupling constants c_n, determine the asymptotic structure of the corresponding solution.
“Moreover, generically the constants n a characterizing the base manifold, along with the coupling constants c n , determine the asymptotic structure of the corresponding solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metric is the unique asymptotically flat spacetime in the whole family.
“Note however that the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metric is the unique asymptotically flat spacetime in the whole family.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Equation (8) is the generalization of the polynomial equation first given by Wheeler, whose solution determines the metric function for spherically symmetric solutions of Lovelock gravity.
“This is the generalization of the polynomial equation, first given by Wheeler [18], whose solution determines the metric function for spherically symmetric solutions of Lovelock gravity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Wheeler, 1986, Nucl. Phys. B source
- Interpretationreasoning
The constants characterizing the base manifold can be chosen arbitrarily.
“all the non-trivial intrinsic Lovelock tensors of the base manifold are constants, which can be chosen arbitrarily”
- Also stated in: § 4. Conclusion · plain
“These constants (if not identically zero) can be chosen arbitrarily but once fixed they do appear in the metric function in the transverse space since they must satisfy the algebraic equation (8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4. Conclusion · plain
- May combine two claims. 8
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOur analysis applies to a general Lovelock gravity of arbitrary order with generic coupling constants, in arbitrary dimensions and for arbitrary base manifolds.
“Our analysis applies to a general Lovelock gravity of arbitrary order with generic coupling constants, in arbitrary dimensions and for arbitrary base manifolds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor generic coupling constants, the solutions of form (1) are given by a single metric function g(r) which solves algebraic equation (8), such that the Lovelock tensors on the base manifold are given by (10).
“In summary, for generic coupling constants, the solutions of the form (1) are given by a single metric function g(r) which solves the algebraic equation (8), such that the Lovelock tensors on the base manifold are given by (10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor the maximum multiplicity choice of coupling constants, the theory does not admit Birkhoff's theorem; there exist more general solutions of form (1).
“However, as mentioned earlier, for this choice of the coupling constants the theory does not admit Birkhoff's theorem in that there exists more general solutions of the form (1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFor certain choices of coupling constants, the field equations reduce to an under-determined set of equations and Birkhoff's theorem is no longer valid.
“However, it is also important to note that for certain choices of the coupling constants, the field equations reduce to an under-determined set of equations and Birkhoff's theorem is no longer valid.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn Case I D>2k+2, the Wronskian of the functions must be of maximal rank k, so that there is a single equation (7) which can be integrated to (8) determining g(r).
“For the sake of simplicity we first consider Case I: D k 2 2. > + Let us consider the equation (5) first.Since the polynomials A n (U) depend on the coupling constants, which are arbitrarily specified, the Wronskian of the functions r r A U n k d d 0, 1, , n D n n 2 1 ( ) ( ) ȳ =”
- Also stated in: § > · plain
“must be of maximal 2 rank k, ¯so that there is a single equation of the form 0 7 n k n n 0 ( ) å a y = = which can be trivially integrated to r A U constant 8 n k n D n n 0 2 1 ( ) ( ) å a = = -- which in turn determines the unknown function g r .( )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § > · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor generic coupling constants, the t r components of the field equations imply that the Levi-Civita component G_rt must vanish and consequently g(r,t) must be independent of the timelike coordinate t.
“After carrying out some algebra, one finds that, for generic values of the coupling constants c k , the 0 t r r t = = components of the field equations imply that the Levi-Civita component rt r G must vanish and consequently the metric function g r t , ( ) must be independent of the timelike coordinate t i.e., g r t g r , . ( ) ( ) =”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFor Einstein base manifolds, the results are in agreement with previously obtained results for particular cases.
“Finally, for Einstein base manifolds where C ˆabrs is the conformal (Weyl) tensor on the base manifold.One can check that our results are in agreement with the previously obtained results for the particular cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningIn any spacetime dimensions D, there can be at most a finite number of nontrivial terms in the Lovelock action; beyond a certain order the terms are either identically zero or topological invariants.
“In any spacetime dimensions D, there can be at most a finite number of nontrivial terms in the sum.This is because beyond a certain order (equal to the integral part of D 1 2 ( ) - ) the terms in the action are either identically zero or are topological invariants whose variation with respect to the metric gives a total derivative and consequently does not contribute to the equations of motion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe reduced field equations are of the form sum f_k(x) g_k(y)=0, a functional equation of Pexider type, and can be solved in an elementary way.
“From the expressions (5) and (6), we see that the reduced field equations are of the form f x g y 0 k k k ( ) ( ) å = which is a functional equation of Pexider type and can be solved in an elementary way [19,20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Aczél, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [20] Sutô, 1914, Tôhoku Math. J.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLovelock theory is a natural higher curvature generalization of Einstein's general relativity and retains the property that the field equations are of second order in the metric.
“Birkhoff's theorem also holds in Lovelock theory of gravity [4,5] which is a natural higher curvature generalization of Einstein's general relativity and retains the property that the field equations are of second order in the metric [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Lovelock, 1971, J. Math. Phys. source
The paper relies on this without support.
If the base manifold is left arbitrary in the metric ansatz, the field equations only imply that it must be an (Euclidean) Einstein manifold.
“Now, if the base manifold is left arbitrary in the metric ansatz, then the field equations only imply that it must be an (Euclidean) Einstein manifold and hence one can obtain another solution by replacing the round D 2 ( ) --sphere by any other Einstein manifold with the same Ricci curvature.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In four spacetime dimensions, the round 2-sphere is the unique (up to discrete quotients) Einstein manifold with positive curvature, while in higher dimensions there are other possibilities.
“However, in four spacetime dimensions, the round 2-sphere is the unique (up to discrete quotients) Einstein manifold with positive curvature.In higher dimensions there are other possibilities.”
Cites
The Einstein Tensor and Its Generalizations
Lovelock, D. (1971) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1665613 · Cited by 2,945 · see citing works
Symmetric solutions to the maximally Gauss-Bonnet extended Einstein equations
Wheeler, J. T. (1986) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90388-3 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Crisóstomo, J., Troncoso, R., & Zanelli, J. (2000) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.084013 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Uniqueness and Nonuniqueness of Static Black Holes in Higher Dimensions
Gibbons, G. W., Ida, D., & Shiromizu, T. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.041101 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Uniqueness and Non-Uniqueness of Static Vacuum Black Holes in Higher Dimensions
Gibbons, G. W., Ida, D., & Shiromizu, T. (2002) · Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement · doi:10.1143/ptps.148.284 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Inhomogeneous Einstein metrics on low-dimensional spheres and other low-dimensional spaces
Böhm, C. (1998) · Inventiones Mathematicae · doi:10.1007/s002220050261 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Birkhoff’s theorem in Lovelock gravity
Zegers, R. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1960798 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Deser, S., & Franklin, J. (2005) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/16/l03 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Obstructions on the horizon geometry from string theory corrections to Einstein gravity
Dotti, G., & Gleiser, R. J. (2005) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.110 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet metrics: black holes, black strings and a staticity theorem
Bogdanos, C., Charmousis, C., Goutéraux, B., & Zegers, R. (2009) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/10/037 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
VACUUM SOLUTIONS WITH NONTRIVIAL BOUNDARIES FOR THE EINSTEIN-GAUSS-BONNET THEORY
Dotti, G., Oliva, J., & Troncoso, R. (2009) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x09045248 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Gauss-Bonnet black holes with nonconstant curvature horizons
Maeda, H. (2010) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.124007 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Static solutions with nontrivial boundaries for the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory in vacuum
Dotti, G., Oliva, J., & Troncoso, R. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.024002 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Static pure Lovelock black hole solutions with horizon topology S(n) × S(n)
Dadhich, N., & Pons, J. M. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2015)067 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Stacking a 4D geometry into an Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet bulk
Barceló, C., Maartens, R., Sopuerta, C. F., & Viniegra, F. (2003) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.064023 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Lovelock black holes with nonmaximally symmetric horizons
Farhangkhah, N., & Dehghani, M. H. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.044014 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Oliva, J. (2013) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4795258 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
DADHICH, N. K., & Pons, J. M. (2015) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3481-y · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Extensions of Birkhoff’s Theorem in 6D Gauss-Bonnet Gravity
Bogdanos, C., Alimi, J., & Fuözfa, A. (2010) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.3462680 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sutô, 1914, Tôhoku Math. J., 6, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generalized quasitopological gravity
Hennigar, R. A., Kubizňák, D., & Mann, R. B. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.104042 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Quintic quasi-topological gravity
Cisterna, A., Guajardo, L., Hassaı̈ne, M., & Oliva, J. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2017)066 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Quintessential quartic quasi-topological quartet
Ahmed, J., Hennigar, R. A., Mann, R. B., & Mir, M. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)134 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Slowly rotating black holes in Einsteinian cubic gravity
Adair, C., Bueno, P., Cano, P. A., Hennigar, R. A., & Mann, R. B. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.084001 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Higher Dimensional Static and Spherically Symmetric Solutions in Extended Gauss–Bonnet Gravity
Bajardi, F., Dialektopoulos, K. F., & Capozzıello, S. (2020) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym12030372 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Criticality for charged black branes
Hennigar, R. A. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2017)082 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Criteria for energy conditions
Maeda, H., & Harada, T. (2022) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac8861 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Thermodynamics of exotic black holes in Lovelock gravity
Hull, B. R., & Mann, R. B. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.084032 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Charged black strings and black branes in Lovelock theories
Giacomini, A., Lagos, M., Oliva, J., & Vera, A. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.044019 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Hervik, S., & Ortaggio, M. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)047 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Charged Taub-NUT solution in Lovelock gravity with generalized Wheeler polynomials
Corral, C., Flores-Alfonso, D., & Quevedo, H. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.064051 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Farhangkhah, N., & Dayyani, Z. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.024068 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
An, X., & Wong, W. W.-Y. (2017) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa8af7 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Topologically nontrivial black holes in Lovelock-Born-Infeld gravity
Farhangkhah, N. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.084031 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
5D Lovelock gravity: New exact solutions with torsion
Cvetković, B., & Simić, D. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.084037 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
A black hole with torsion in 5D Lovelock gravity
Cvetković, B., & Simić, D. (2017) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aaa3a7 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Kastor, D. A., Ray, S., & Traschen, J. (2017) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa8608 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationBirkhoff implies quasi-topological
Bueno, P., Hennigar, R. A., & Murcia, Á. (2026) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae6600 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Topological characterization of higher-dimensional charged Taub–NUT instantons
Flores-Alfonso, D., & Quevedo, H. (2019) · International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · doi:10.1142/s0219887819501548 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Geometrical origin of the Kodama vector
Kinoshita, S. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.044056 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Inhomogeneous metrics on complex bundles in Lovelock gravity
Corral, C., Diez, B., Flores-Alfonso, D., Merino, N., & Sanhueza, L. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.124016 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Exotic black hole thermodynamics in third-order Lovelock gravity
Hull, B. R., & Simovic, F. (2023) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acdb3d · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Novel topological black holes from thermodynamics and deforming horizons
Yang, J. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.084032 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Existence and absence of Killing horizons in static solutions with symmetries
Maeda, H., & Martínez, C. (2024) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad8ea4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Meronic AdS black holes in Gauss-Bonnet theory
Flores-Alfonso, D., & Larios, B. O. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.064017 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
New solutions of exotic charged black holes and their stability
Farhangkhah, N. (2016) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271816500309 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Universal p-form black holes in generalized theories of gravity
Hervik, S., & Ortaggio, M. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08571-x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Universal p-form black holes in generalized theories of gravity
Hervik, S., & Ortaggio, M. (2020) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Negative mass black holes in de Sitter space
Hull, B. R., & Mann, R. B. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.064027 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Exotic Lovelock black holes and extended quasitopological electromagnetism
Ali, A., & Saifullah, K. (2025) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14731-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Renormalization of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet AdS gravity
Anastasiou, G., Araya, I. J., Chakraborty, A., Corral, C., & Rodrigo Olea, A. (2026) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2026)091 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Aros, R., & Estrada, M. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.104044 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Scalar probes on wormholes in Lovelock theories with unique vacuum
Fierro, O., Narbona, D., Oliva, J., Quijada, C., & Rubilar, G. F. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.024027 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Farhangkhah, N., & Hajkhalili, S. (2025) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ae30fa
- Authors
- Ray, S.
- Affiliations
- Austral University of Chile (CL)
- Corresponding author
- Ray, Sourya
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-09-17
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 195022
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W1745081308
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica: (FONDECYT Regular 1150907)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- Birkhoff's theorem, Lovelock gravity, warped products, static spacetimes, higher-curvature gravity, exact solutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review