Cited by 674Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement

Leggett, A. J.·1980·Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1143/ptps.69.80

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leggett, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Leggett, A. J.
Venue
Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement
Published
1980
Volume
69
Pages
80-100
ISSN
0375-9687 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084705579
Cited by
674
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 28
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
macroscopic quantum systems, quantum measurement theory, measurement problem, decoherence, quantum-to-classical transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review