Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sea-level change and facies development across potential Triassic–Jurassic boundary horizons, SW Britain

Hesselbo, Stephen P., Robinson, Stuart A., Surlyk, Finn·2004·Journal of the Geological Society

Abstract

The Late Triassic to Early Jurassic aged succession of SW Britain (the Penarth and lower Lias Groups) comprises mudstone, sandstone and limestone strata deposited in a variety of marine to non-marine environments. Faunal and floral characteristics of these successions have led to the proposal that one location in SW England, St Audrie's Bay, should serve as the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Hettangian Stage and, thus, for the Triassic–Jurassic (Tr–J) boundary. The sections of SW Britain have also been used previously to infer sea-level change history and relate this to potential kill mechanisms associated with the Tr–J boundary mass extinction. Chemostratigraphic, biofacies and lithofacies data are used here to suggest alternative models of sea-level change in relation to possible Tr–J boundary horizons in the sections of SW Britain. A sea-level lowstand surface of erosion is inferred to occur within the Cotham Member of the Lilstock Formation, a unit deposited in an environment that was often subaerially exposed. In contrast to previous interpretations, the top surface of the overlying Langport Member (here inferred to be deposited on a carbonate ramp of depositional or tectonic origin) represents a drowning event of at least regional extent. All horizons regarded as plausible levels at which to place the Tr–J boundary based on fossil distributions lie within strata deposited during relative sea-level rise. However, it is doubtful whether the higher horizons proposed to mark the boundary faithfully record times of true biotic change on a global scale and, additionally, there is no positive evidence that sea-level fall had any relation to the genesis of proposed Tr–J marker horizons. It is unlikely that sea-level fall played a significant role in the Tr–J boundary extinctions in either a local or a global context.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/0016-764903-033

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • An oscillating trend in Phanerozoic non-skeletal carbonate mineralogy

    Sandberg, P. A. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/305019a0 · Cited by 818 · cited 1×

    “Radial calcite ooids are typical of marine environments during certain periods of the Phanerozoic and the upper Cotham Member calcite ooids are noteworthy because the Tr–J boundary corresponds approximately to a time of transition from aragonite to calcite seas (Sandberg 1983).”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Hesselbo, S. P., Robinson, S. A., & Surlyk, F.
Venue
Journal of the Geological Society
Published
2004-05
Volume
161
Issue
3
Pages
365-379
ISSN
  • 0016-7649 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-479X
OpenAlex
W2104767413
Cited by
201
References
1
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sea-level change and facies development across potential Triassic–Jurassic boundary horizons, SW Britain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1144/0016-764903-033
The paper
Hesselbo, S. P., Robinson, S. A., & Surlyk, F. (2004). Sea-level change and facies development across potential Triassic–Jurassic boundary horizons, SW Britain. Journal of the Geological Society. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764903-033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.