The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sea-level change and facies development across potential Triassic–Jurassic boundary horizons, SW Britain
Abstract
The Late Triassic to Early Jurassic aged succession of SW Britain (the Penarth and lower Lias Groups) comprises mudstone, sandstone and limestone strata deposited in a variety of marine to non-marine environments. Faunal and floral characteristics of these successions have led to the proposal that one location in SW England, St Audrie's Bay, should serve as the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Hettangian Stage and, thus, for the Triassic–Jurassic (Tr–J) boundary. The sections of SW Britain have also been used previously to infer sea-level change history and relate this to potential kill mechanisms associated with the Tr–J boundary mass extinction. Chemostratigraphic, biofacies and lithofacies data are used here to suggest alternative models of sea-level change in relation to possible Tr–J boundary horizons in the sections of SW Britain. A sea-level lowstand surface of erosion is inferred to occur within the Cotham Member of the Lilstock Formation, a unit deposited in an environment that was often subaerially exposed. In contrast to previous interpretations, the top surface of the overlying Langport Member (here inferred to be deposited on a carbonate ramp of depositional or tectonic origin) represents a drowning event of at least regional extent. All horizons regarded as plausible levels at which to place the Tr–J boundary based on fossil distributions lie within strata deposited during relative sea-level rise. However, it is doubtful whether the higher horizons proposed to mark the boundary faithfully record times of true biotic change on a global scale and, additionally, there is no positive evidence that sea-level fall had any relation to the genesis of proposed Tr–J marker horizons. It is unlikely that sea-level fall played a significant role in the Tr–J boundary extinctions in either a local or a global context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An oscillating trend in Phanerozoic non-skeletal carbonate mineralogy
Sandberg, P. A. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/305019a0 · Cited by 818 · cited 1×
“Radial calcite ooids are typical of marine environments during certain periods of the Phanerozoic and the upper Cotham Member calcite ooids are noteworthy because the Tr–J boundary corresponds approximately to a time of transition from aragonite to calcite seas (Sandberg 1983).”
Background
Cited by
Simms, M. J. (2007) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.06.037 · Cited by 77
GSSPs, global stratigraphy and correlation
Smith, A. G., Barry, T., Bown, P., Cope, J., Gale, A., Gibbard, P., Gregory, J., Hounslow, M., Kemp, D., Knox, R., et al. (2015) · Geological Society, London, Special Publications · doi:10.1144/sp404.8 · Cited by 63
Sato, H., Nozaki, T., Onoue, T., Ishikawa, A., Soda, K., Yasukawa, K., Kimura, J.-I., Chang, Q., Kato, Y., & Rigo, M. (2023) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2023.104239 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Hesselbo, S. P., Robinson, S. A., & Surlyk, F.
- Venue
- Journal of the Geological Society
- Publisher
- Geological Society of London
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 365-379
- ISSN
- 0016-7649 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-479X
- OpenAlex
- W2104767413
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sea-level change and facies development across potential Triassic–Jurassic boundary horizons, SW Britain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1144/0016-764903-033
- The paper
- Hesselbo, S. P., Robinson, S. A., & Surlyk, F. (2004). Sea-level change and facies development across potential Triassic–Jurassic boundary horizons, SW Britain. Journal of the Geological Society. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764903-033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.