Cited by 17Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

The Norite of Sierra Leone

Dixey, Frank·1922·Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London

Abstract

I. Introduction. The norite of Freetown (Sierra Leone) was briefly described by G. Gürich in 1887, and in 1918 Prof. S. J. Shand translated Gürich's work, adding a few notes. I had the opportunity of making a detailed examination of this norite, as part of an investigation into the mineral resources of Sierra Leone; and in the course of this work it was found that the norite exposed around Freetown was only one end of a huge noritic complex which made up the whole mountain-mass of the Colony. Moreover, during the examination several features of considerable interest were observed, including the assimilation of one phase of the norite by another, the well-developed banding in the norite, the segregation of the iron-ores, and the sequence of the minor intrusions. These features, together with an important series of intergrowths of the common minerals, will be described in the course of this paper. The investigation into the mineral resources of the Colony, with especial reference to the iron-ores, formed part of the work of the Geological Survey of Sierra Leone during the latter part of 1918 and during 1919. (2) Physiography of the Area. 2 The Colony is a mountainous peninsula adjacent to the undulating low ground which forms the southern part of the Protectorate. Its mountains rise steeply from a narrow coastal plain to a height of nearly 3000 feet; this plain is continuous with that of the mainland, and is due to a Pleistocene uplift of a little over 300 feet. It

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/gsl.jgs.1922.078.01-04.12

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The drainage pattern of the central part of the Freetown Peninsula is strongly influenced by NE-SW orientated parallel mountain ridges and two main NW-SE orientated valleys, probably associated with major unloading joint systems and bedrock faults.

    “The drainage pattern is strongly influenced by a series of NE-SW orientated parallel mountain ridges (Dixey 1922) and two main NW-SE orientated valleys, probably associated with major unloading joint systems, and bedrock faults respectively.”

    From The 2017 Regent Landslide, Freetown Peninsula, Sierra Leone (2019) · cites this paper as Dixey 1922

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dixey, F.
Corresponding author
Dixey, Frank
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London
Published
1922-03
Volume
78
Issue
1-4
Pages
299-347
ISSN
0370-291X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062398673
Cited by
17
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
norite, Sierra Leone, Freetown, mineral resources, iron ore, assimilation, banding, mineral intergrowths, Pleistocene uplift

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review