Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 368

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond the turbidite paradigm: physical models for deposition of turbidites and their implications for reservoir prediction

Kneller, Ben·1995·Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Abstract

The simple physical models which are popularly used to describe deposition from turbidity currents are based on the notion of unidirectional waning flow, resulting in the familiar Bouma sequence (Ta-e) or its high-density counterpart, the Lowe sequence (S1-3). Most geologists working on turbidite successions know only too well how wide is the range of facies which do not fit into the standard facies models. The application of simple equations of motion shows that deposition can occur beneath flows that are steady or even waxing. The various combinations of different spatial and temporal accelerations produce markedly different vertical and lateral variations in the resulting turbidite. On these grounds alone, we should expect not one but at least five basic types of sequence in turbidite beds, for which likely candidates can be found in many deep water clastic systems. This has important implications for deposit geometry, gradients in reservoir properties, and geological interpretation and correlation of well cores. Since many basins are confined, a priori reasoning tells us to expect interactions between turbidity currents and topography, producing anomalous intrabed vertical sequences, multiple current directions and locally enhanced deposition. Flume experiments with radially spreading scaled sediment gravity flows demonstrate how the geometry of sandstone deposits may be controlled by topography. Interactions between the flow and topographic features are dependent upon the shape and orientation of the obstacle, and upon its size relative to the height of the flow. Some of the results are counter-intuitive, and may have significant impact on location of reservoir sands around basin-floor and marginal topography.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/gsl.sp.1995.094.01.04

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Metadata

Authors
Kneller, B.
Venue
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published
1995-01
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
31-49
ISSN
  • 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-4927
OpenAlex
W1966477083
Cited by
368
References
18
FWCI
15.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the turbidite paradigm: physical models for deposition of turbidites and their implications for reservoir prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1144/gsl.sp.1995.094.01.04
The paper
Kneller, B. (1995). Beyond the turbidite paradigm: physical models for deposition of turbidites and their implications for reservoir prediction. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.1995.094.01.04

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.