Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 454

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tortuosity: a guide through the maze

Clennell, M. Ben·1997·Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Abstract

Despite its widespread use in petrophysics, tortuosity remains a poorly understood concept. Tortuosity can have various meanings when used by physicists, engineers or geologists to describe different transport processes taking place in a porous material. Values for geometrical, electrical, diffusional and hydraulic tortuosity are in general different from one another. Electrical tortuosity is defined in terms of conductivity whereas hydraulic tortuosity is usually defined geometrically, and diffusional tortuosity is typically computed from temporal changes in concentration. A better approach may be to define tortuosity in terms of the underlying flux of material or electrical current with respect to the forces which drive this flow. Unsteady transport processes, including diffusion, can be described only by a population of tortuosities corresponding to the different flow paths taken by particles traversing the medium. In measurements of steady flow (e.g., those normally used to obtain resistivity or permeability), information about particle travel times is lost, and so the multiple values of tortuosity are homogenised. It can be shown that the maximum amount of information about pore structure is embedded in transport processes that combine advective and diffusive elements. Most existing formulations of tortuosity are model-dependent, and cannot be correlated with independently measurable pore-structure properties. Nevertheless, tortuosity underpins the rigorous relationships between transport processes in rocks, and ties them with the underlying geometry and topology of their pore spaces. Tortuosity can be redefined in terms of the energetic efficiency of a flow process. The efficiency is related to the rate of entropy dissipation (or isothermally, energy dissipation) with respect to a simple, non-tortuous model medium using the postulates of non-equilibrium thermodynamics. Through Onsager’s reciprocity relation for coupled flows it is possible to inter-relate efficiency for pairs of transport processes, and so go some way towards unifying tortuosity measures. In this way we can approach the goal of predicting the value of one transport parameter from measurements of another.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/gsl.sp.1997.122.01.18

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

See all 454

Metadata

Authors
Clennell, M. B.
Venue
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published
1997-01
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
299-344
ISSN
  • 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-4927
OpenAlex
W2143332109
Cited by
454
References
71
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tortuosity: a guide through the maze. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1144/gsl.sp.1997.122.01.18
The paper
Clennell, M. B. (1997). Tortuosity: a guide through the maze. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.1997.122.01.18

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.