Cited by 154Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsGranular flow and fluidized bedsCrystallization and Solubility Studies

Characterisation of pore structures of pharmaceutical tablets: A review

Open access
Markl, Daniel, Strobel, Alexa, Schlossnikl, Rüdiger, Bøtker, Johan, Bawuah, Prince, Ridgway, Cathy, Rantanen, Jukka, Rades, Thomas +3 more·2018·International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Traditionally, the development of a new solid dosage form is formulation-driven and less focus is put on the design of a specific microstructure for the drug delivery system. However, the compaction process particularly impacts the microstructure, or more precisely, the pore architecture in a pharmaceutical tablet. Besides the formulation, the pore structure is a major contributor to the overall performance of oral solid dosage forms as it directly affects the liquid uptake rate, which is the very first step of the dissolution process. In future, additive manufacturing is a potential game changer to design the inner structures and realise a tailor-made pore structure. In pharmaceutical development the pore structure is most commonly only described by the total porosity of the tablet matrix. Yet it is of great importance to consider other parameters to fully resolve the interplay between microstructure and dosage form performance. Specifically, tortuosity, connectivity, as well as pore shape, size and orientation all impact the flow paths and play an important role in describing the fluid flow in a pharmaceutical tablet. This review presents the key properties of the pore structures in solid dosage forms and it discusses how to measure these properties. In particular, the principles, advantages and limitations of helium pycnometry, mercury porosimetry, terahertz time-domain spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray computed microtomography are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.01.017

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Porosity governs the mass transport processes and mechanical changes in tablets during disintegration and hence directly affects the dissolution time of tablets.

    “Porosity governs the mass transport processes and mechanical changes in tablets during disintegration and hence directly affects the dissolution time of tablets.”

    From Terahertz-Based Porosity Measurement of Pharmaceutical Tablets: a Tutorial (2020) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction says tablet void space controls liquid transport and that liquid uptake is often rate-determining for disintegration; it also describes swelling that ruptures interparticle bonds. Section 7.2 links porosity/density to disintegration time and the amount of drug dissolved after 15 minutes, but does not establish that porosity directly determines dissolution time. It instead says dissolution after disintegration is driven by the size of the resulting particles. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Porosity is one of the most important contributors to tablet disintegration and dissolution characteristics.

    “Porosity, a potential critical quality attribute (CQA) of tablets, is one of the most important contributors to tablet disintegration and dissolution characteristics [46].”
  • Porosity is a potential critical quality attribute (CQA) of tablets.

    “Porosity, a potential critical quality attribute (CQA) of tablets, is one of the most important contributors to tablet disintegration and dissolution characteristics [46].”
  • The terahertz method is able to probe both connected and isolated pores whereas conventional methods like mercury porosimetry only capture connected pores.

    “This is due to the fact that the terahertz method is able to probe both connected and isolated pores whereas conventional methods like mercury porosimetry only capture connected pores.”
  • The use of the THz-TDS method, which is conducted in the transmission configuration, has been demonstrated to accurately measure porosity of homogenous tablets compared to conventional methods like mercury porosimetry.

    “Since porosity is a volumetric property, the use of the THz-TDS method, which is conducted in the transmission configuration, has been demonstrated to accurately measure porosity of homogenous tablets compared to conventional methods like mercury porosimetry [46].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 231 · Cited by 154

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dullien, F.A.L., 1992. Porous Media, Second. ed. Academic Press Inc.
  2. Levitt, M.H., 2008. Spin Dynamics, Second Edition. ed. John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Sheikhveisi, H., 2015. A Function-Based Image Binarization based on Histogram. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 9, 418-426.

Authors
Markl, D., Strobel, A., Schlossnikl, R., Bøtker, J., Bawuah, P., Ridgway, C., Rantanen, J., Rades, T., Gane, P., Peiponen, K.-E., & Zeitler, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Omya (Switzerland) (CH)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Markl, Daniel
Venue
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
538
Issue
1-2
Pages
188-214
ISSN
0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2784237600
Cited by
154
References
231
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Danish Council for Independent Research
  • Technology and Production Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
Keywords
tablet microstructure, compaction, porosity, tortuosity, pore connectivity, pore shape, fluid intake, dissolution, solid dosage forms, helium pycnometry, mercury intrusion porosimetry, terahertz time-domain spectroscopy, X-ray computed microtomography, nuclear magnetic resonance, additive manufacturing, drug delivery
MeSH terms
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Tablets, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Porosity, Drug Delivery Systems, Terahertz Spectroscopy, X-Ray Microtomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review