Cited by 158Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide

Exhumation of UHP rocks by transtension in the Western Gneiss Region, Scandinavian Caledonides

Krabbendam, Maarten, Dewey, John F.·1998·Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Abstract

In the Western Gneiss Region (WGR) in the Scandinavian Caledonides, Scandian ecologites ( P = 16 to >28 kbar) occur in a large area of reworked Proterozoic gneisses, structurally below a series of Scandian nappes. The top-to-the-west, extensional Nordfjord-Sogn Detachment (NSD) separates the WGR from allochthonous units, which include several late-orogenic Devonian basins. The allochthon has not experienced Scandian high-pressure (HP) metamorphism. Below the NSD, the WGR is intensely deformed under late-orogenic amphibolite-facies conditions. This deformation is bulk-constrictional, as indicated by a linear feldspar fabric within augen gneisses and tight to isoclinal, lineation-parallel folds within layered gneisses. In a later stage, the NSD, the WGR and the Devonian basins were folded by east-west trending folds, coeval with continuing movement along detachments. To explain these features we propose a transtensional model for the late-orogenic evolution of the WGR. Transtension in West Norway had a sinistral sense and was partially partitioned with increasing transtensional angle towards the NE-SW trending Møre-Trøndelag Fault Zone in the NW. During transtension, there is a strong tendency for rejuvenation of detachments, because detachments fold and may lock as they move. In the WGR, the younger Hornelen Detachment developed above the older NSD. Transtension was the principal exhumation mechanism of the HP and ultra-high-pressure (UHP) rocks in the WGR and involved oblique plate divergence of Laurentia and Baltica during the Early Devonian.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/gsl.sp.1998.135.01.11

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The better preservation of the HP rocks in the central Grenville Province may attest to the greater efficiency of tectonic extrusion as an exhumation process.

    “The better preservation of the HP rocks in the central Grenville Province may attest to the greater efficiency of tectonic extrusion as an exhumation process”

    From The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation (2002) · cites this paper as Krabbendam and Dewey 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krabbendam, M., & Dewey, J. F.
Venue
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published
1998-01
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
159-181
ISSN
  • 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-4927
OpenAlex
W2082686357
Cited by
158
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geological Society London Special Publications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Keywords
Western Gneiss Region, Scandinavian Caledonides, ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism, exhumation, transtension, detachment folding, Devonian basins, Proterozoic gneiss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review