Exhumation of UHP rocks by transtension in the Western Gneiss Region, Scandinavian Caledonides
Abstract
In the Western Gneiss Region (WGR) in the Scandinavian Caledonides, Scandian ecologites ( P = 16 to >28 kbar) occur in a large area of reworked Proterozoic gneisses, structurally below a series of Scandian nappes. The top-to-the-west, extensional Nordfjord-Sogn Detachment (NSD) separates the WGR from allochthonous units, which include several late-orogenic Devonian basins. The allochthon has not experienced Scandian high-pressure (HP) metamorphism. Below the NSD, the WGR is intensely deformed under late-orogenic amphibolite-facies conditions. This deformation is bulk-constrictional, as indicated by a linear feldspar fabric within augen gneisses and tight to isoclinal, lineation-parallel folds within layered gneisses. In a later stage, the NSD, the WGR and the Devonian basins were folded by east-west trending folds, coeval with continuing movement along detachments. To explain these features we propose a transtensional model for the late-orogenic evolution of the WGR. Transtension in West Norway had a sinistral sense and was partially partitioned with increasing transtensional angle towards the NE-SW trending Møre-Trøndelag Fault Zone in the NW. During transtension, there is a strong tendency for rejuvenation of detachments, because detachments fold and may lock as they move. In the WGR, the younger Hornelen Detachment developed above the older NSD. Transtension was the principal exhumation mechanism of the HP and ultra-high-pressure (UHP) rocks in the WGR and involved oblique plate divergence of Laurentia and Baltica during the Early Devonian.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The better preservation of the HP rocks in the central Grenville Province may attest to the greater efficiency of tectonic extrusion as an exhumation process.
“The better preservation of the HP rocks in the central Grenville Province may attest to the greater efficiency of tectonic extrusion as an exhumation process”
From The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation (2002) · cites this paper as Krabbendam and Dewey 1998
Cites
Coesite in clinopyroxene in the Caledonides and its implications for geodynamics
Smith, D. C. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/310641a0 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation
Rivers, T., Ketchum, J., Indares, A., & Hynes, A. (2002) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/e02-025 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krabbendam, M., & Dewey, J. F.
- Venue
- Geological Society, London, Special Publications
- Publisher
- Geological Society of London
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 159-181
- ISSN
- 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-4927
- OpenAlex
- W2082686357
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geological Society London Special Publications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
- Keywords
- Western Gneiss Region, Scandinavian Caledonides, ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism, exhumation, transtension, detachment folding, Devonian basins, Proterozoic gneiss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review