Metamorphic constraints on the tectonic evolution of the High Himalaya in Nepal: the art of the possible
Abstract
This review presents an objective account of metamorphic, microstructural and geochronological studies in the Greater Himalayan Sequence (GHS) and adjacent units in Nepal in the light of recent research. The importance of integrated, multidisciplinary studies is highlighted. A personal view is presented of strategies for determining pressure–temperature evolution, and of petrological processes at the micro scale, particularly in relation to departures from equilibrium and the behaviour of partially-melted rock systems. Evidence has accumulated for the existence within the GHS of a High Himalayan Discontinuity, marked by differences in timing of peak metamorphism in the hanging wall and footwall, and changes in P–T gradients and paths. Whether or not this is a single continuous horizon, it forms at each location the lower boundary to a migmatitic zone capable of ductile flow, and separates the GHS into an upper division in which channel flow may have operated in the interval 25–18 Ma, and a lower division characterized by an inverted metamorphic gradient, and by metamorphic ages that decrease downsection and are best explained by sequential accretion of footwall slices between 20 and 6 Ma. An overall model for extrusion of the GHS is still not resolved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sample BC04 shows microstructures that reflect decompression at higher temperature, as the GASP reaction or resorbed garnet with corona of biotite and plagioclase.
“The sample also shows microstructures that reflect decompression at higher temperature, as the GASP reaction or resorbed garnet with corona of biotite and plagioclase (e.g., Waters 2019).”
From The role of excess oxygen for modeling high-Mn, low-Ca garnets in metapelites from the northern Central Metasedimentary Belt of the Grenville Province, Ontario, Canada (2021) · cites this paper as Waters 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 244 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Waters, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Waters, David J.
- ORCID
- Waters, David J.
- Venue
- Geological Society, London, Special Publications
- Publisher
- Geological Society of London
- Published
- 2019-03-26
- Volume
- 483
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 325-375
- ISSN
- 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-4927
- OpenAlex
- W2912902731
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 244
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geological Society London Special Publications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological Formations and Processes Exploration
- Keywords
- Greater Himalayan Sequence, Higher Himalaya, tectonic evolution, metamorphic evolution, P-T path, partial melting, microstructure, geochronology, channel flow, ductile flow, migmatites, Nepal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review