The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fully automatic cross-associations
Abstract
Large, sparse binary matrices arise in numerous data mining applications, such as the analysis of market baskets, web graphs, social networks, co-citations, as well as information retrieval, collaborative filtering, sparse matrix reordering, etc. Virtually all popular methods for the analysis of such matrices---e.g., k-means clustering, METIS graph partitioning, SVD/PCA and frequent itemset mining---require the user to specify various parameters, such as the number of clusters, number of principal components, number of partitions, and "support." Choosing suitable values for such parameters is a challenging problem.Cross-association is a joint decomposition of a binary matrix into disjoint row and column groups such that the rectangular intersections of groups are homogeneous. Starting from first principles, we furnish a clear, information-theoretic criterion to choose a good cross-association as well as its parameters, namely, the number of row and column groups. We provide scalable algorithms to approach the optimal. Our algorithm is parameter-free, and requires no user intervention. In practice it scales linearly with the problem size, and is thus applicable to very large matrices. Finally, we present experiments on multiple synthetic and real-life datasets, where our method gives high-quality, intuitive results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trajectory clustering: a partition-and-group framework
Lee, J.-G., Han, J., & Whang, K.-Y. (2007) · Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1247480.1247546 · Cited by 1,363
GraphScope: parameter-free mining of large time-evolving graphs
Sun, J., Faloutsos, C., Papadimitriou, S., & Yu, P. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1281192.1281266 · Cited by 532
Self-citationOpinion Fraud Detection in Online Reviews by Network Effects
Akoglu, L., Chandy, R., & Faloutsos, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14380 · Cited by 391
Self-citationBLINC: multilevel traffic classification in the dark
Karagiannis, T., Papagiannaki, K., & Faloutsos, M. (2005) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/1090191.1080119 · Cited by 354
A classification for community discovery methods in complex networks
Coscia, M., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2011) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.10133 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Chakrabarti, D., Papadimitriou, S., Modha, D. S., & Faloutsos, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2004-08-22
- Pages
- 79-88
- OpenAlex
- W2141806397
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fully automatic cross-associations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1014052.1014064
- The paper
- Chakrabarti, D., Papadimitriou, S., Modha, D. S., & Faloutsos, C. (2004). Fully automatic cross-associations. Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/1014052.1014064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.