The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving SVM accuracy by training on auxiliary data sources
Abstract
The standard model of supervised learning assumes that training and test data are drawn from the same underlying distribution. This paper explores an application in which a second, auxiliary, source of data is available drawn from a different distribution. This auxiliary data is more plentiful, but of significantly lower quality, than the training and test data. In the SVM framework, a training example has two roles: (a) as a data point to constrain the learning process and (b) as a candidate support vector that can form part of the definition of the classifier. The paper considers using the auxiliary data in either (or both) of these roles. This auxiliary data framework is applied to a problem of classifying images of leaves of maple and oak trees using a kernel derived from the shapes of the leaves. Experiments show that when the training data set is very small, training with auxiliary data can produce large improvements in accuracy, even when the auxiliary data is significantly different from the training (and test) data. The paper also introduces techniques for adjusting the kernel scores of the auxiliary data points to make them more comparable to the training data points.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Cross-domain video concept detection using adaptive svms
Yang, J., Yan, R., & Hauptmann, A. G. (2007) · Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/1291233.1291276 · Cited by 667
Domain Adaptation From Multiple Sources: A Domain-Dependent Regularization Approach
Duan, L., Xu, D., & Tsang, I. W. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2011.2178556 · Cited by 332
Learning with Augmented Features for Heterogeneous Domain Adaptation
Duan, L., Xu, D., & Tsang, I. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1206.4660 · Cited by 320
Wiens, J., Guttag, J., & Horvitz, E. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002162 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, P., & Dietterich, T. G.
- Venue
- Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 110
- OpenAlex
- W2099971677
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving SVM accuracy by training on auxiliary data sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1015330.1015436
- The paper
- Wu, P., & Dietterich, T. G. (2004). Improving SVM accuracy by training on auxiliary data sources. Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015330.1015436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.