The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches
Abstract
Semantic integration is an active area of research in several disciplines, such as databases, information-integration, and ontologies. This paper provides a brief survey of the approaches to semantic integration developed by researchers in the ontology community. We focus on the approaches that differentiate the ontology research from other related areas. The goal of the paper is to provide a reader who may not be very familiar with ontology research with introduction to major themes in this research and with pointers to different research projects. We discuss techniques for finding correspondences between ontologies, declarative ways of representing these correspondences, and use of these correspondences in various semantic-integration tasks
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations
Ganter, B., Wille, R., & Franzke, C. (1998) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 4,245
A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching
Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s007780100057 · Cited by 3,352
Towards a standard upper ontology
Niles, I., & Pease, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001 · doi:10.1145/505168.505170 · Cited by 1,612
Ontology mapping: the state of the art
Kalfoglou, Y., & Schorlemmer, M. (2003) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888903000651 · Cited by 1,332
Generic Schema Matching with Cupid
Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P. A., & Rahm, E. (2001) · Cited by 1,296
Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web
Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., & Halevy, A. (2002) · Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/511446.511532 · Cited by 885
The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping
Noy, N. F., & Musen, M. A. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.08.002 · Cited by 728
Self-citation(1997) · Cited by 658
Ontologies and semantics for seamless connectivity
Uschold, M., & Grüninger, M. (2004) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/1041410.1041420 · Cited by 410
Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-Lite
Euzenat, J., & Valtchev, P. (2004) · HAL · Cited by 374
Cited by
Toward Scalable Systems for Big Data Analytics: A Technology Tutorial
Hu, H., Wen, Y., Chua, T.-S., & Li, X. (2014) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2014.2332453 · Cited by 1,099
A Comprehensive Survey on Fog Computing: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges
Mouradian, C., Naboulsi, D., Yangui, S., Glitho, R. H., Morrow, M. J., & Polakos, P. A. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2771153 · Cited by 1,022
Processing Social Media Messages in Mass Emergency: A Survey
Imran, M., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Vieweg, S. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2771588 · Cited by 804
Semantic interoperability in the Internet of Things: An overview from the INTER-IoT perspective
Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M., Pawłowski, W., Szmeja, P., & Wasielewska, K. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.08.007 · Cited by 208
Big data hurdles in precision medicine and precision public health
Prosperi, M., Min, J. S., Bian, J., & Modave, F. (2018) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-018-0719-2 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Noy, N. F.
- Venue
- ACM SIGMOD Record
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 65-70
- ISSN
- 0163-5808 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161549461
- Cited by
- 1,019
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 58.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1041410.1041421
- The paper
- Noy, N. F. (2004). Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. ACM SIGMOD Record. https://doi.org/10.1145/1041410.1041421
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
