Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,612

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a standard upper ontology

Niles, Ian, Pease, Adam·2001·Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001

Abstract

Abstract — The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) is an upper level ontology that has been proposed as a starter document for The Standard Upper Ontology Working Group, an IEEE-sanctioned working group of collaborators from the fields of engineering, philosophy, and information science. The SUMO provides definitions for general-purpose terms and acts as a foundation for more specific domain ontologies. In this paper we outline the strategy used to create the current version of the SUMO, discuss some of the challenges that we faced in constructing the ontology, and describe in detail its most general concepts and the relations between them. Categories & Descriptors — I.2.4 [Knowledge Representation Formalisms and

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/505168.505170

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,612

Metadata

Authors
Niles, I., & Pease, A.
Venue
Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001
Publisher
ACM
Published
2001-10-17
Pages
2-9
OpenAlex
W2075123415
Cited by
1,612
References
1
FWCI
19.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a standard upper ontology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/505168.505170
The paper
Niles, I., & Pease, A. (2001). Towards a standard upper ontology. Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001. https://doi.org/10.1145/505168.505170

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.