Cited by 477Tactile and Sensory InteractionsTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt

Erp, Jan B. F. Van, Veen, Hendrik A. H. C. Van, Jansen, Chris, Dobbins, Trevor·2005·ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Abstract

Presenting waypoint navigation on a visual display is not suited for all situations. The present experiments investigate if it is feasible to present the navigation information on a tactile display. Important design issue of the display is how direction and distance information must be coded. Important usability issues are the resolution of the display and its usefulness in vibrating environments. In a pilot study with 12 pedestrians, different distance-coding schemes were compared. The schemes translated distance to vibration rhythm while the direction was translated into vibration location. The display consisted of eight tactors around the user's waist. The results show that mapping waypoint direction on the location of vibration is an effective coding scheme that requires no training, but that coding for distance does not improve performance compared to a control condition with no distance information. In Experiment 2, the usefulness of the tactile display was shown in two case studies with a helicopter and a fast boat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1060581.1060585

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Van Erp et al. (2005) found cueing direction by location worked well.

    “While cueing direction by location worked well, conveying distance in this way was not successful (for other implementations see Cosgun, Sisbot & Christensen, 2014; Johnson & Higgins, 2006; Segond et al., 2013).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Van Erp et al. (2005)

  • Van Erp et al. (2005) found conveying distance via vibration rhythm was not successful.

    “While cueing direction by location worked well, conveying distance in this way was not successful (for other implementations see Cosgun, Sisbot & Christensen, 2014; Johnson & Higgins, 2006; Segond et al., 2013).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Van Erp et al. (2005)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erp, J. B. F. V., Veen, H. A. H. C. V., Jansen, C., & Dobbins, T.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
  • Human Sciences and Engineering, Sidlesham, UK
Venue
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
Published
2005-04
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
106-117
ISSN
  • 1544-3558 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-3965
OpenAlex
W1967114222
Cited by
477
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 32
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (publishedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
waypoint navigation, vibrotactile display, waist belt, tactile guidance, distance coding, display resolution, pedestrian navigation, helicopter navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review