The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deriving private information from randomized data
Abstract
Randomization has emerged as a useful technique for data disguising in privacy-preserving data mining. Its privacy properties have been studied in a number of papers. Kargupta et al. challenged the randomization schemes, and they pointed out that randomization might not be able to preserve privacy. However, it is still unclear what factors cause such a security breach, how they affect the privacy preserving property of the randomization, and what kinds of data have higher risk of disclosing their private contents even though they are randomized.We believe that the key factor is the correlations among attributes. We propose two data reconstruction methods that are based on data correlations. One method uses the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique, and the other method uses the Bayes Estimate (BE) technique. We have conducted theoretical and experimental analysis on the relationship between data correlations and the amount of private information that can be disclosed based our proposed data reconstructions schemes. Our studies have shown that when the correlations are high, the original data can be reconstructed more accurately, i.e., more private information can be disclosed.To improve privacy, we propose a modified randomization scheme, in which we let the correlation of random noises "similar" to the original data. Our results have shown that the reconstruction accuracy of both PCA-based and BE-based schemes become worse as the similarity increases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tools for privacy preserving distributed data mining
Clifton, C., Kantarcioglu, M., Vaidya, J., Lin, X., & Zhu, M. Y. (2002) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/772862.772867 · Cited by 890
Cited by
L -diversity: Privacy beyond k -anonymity
Machanavajjhala, A., Kifer, D., Gehrke, J., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/1217299.1217302 · Cited by 3,617
L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity
Machanavajjhala, A., Gehrke, J., Kifer, D., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2006) · 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06) · doi:10.1109/icde.2006.1 · Cited by 2,362
Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S. (2010) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1749603.1749605 · Cited by 1,704
A General Survey of Privacy-Preserving Data Mining Models and Algorithms
Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2008) · Advances in Database Systems · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_2 · Cited by 469
Privacy-preserving SVM classification
Vaidya, J., Yu, H., & Jiang, X. (2008) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-007-0073-7 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, Z., Du, W., & Chen, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-06-14
- Pages
- 37-48
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022079499
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.27
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deriving private information from randomized data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1066157.1066163
- The paper
- Huang, Z., Du, W., & Chen, B. (2005). Deriving private information from randomized data. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. https://doi.org/10.1145/1066157.1066163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.