The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community
Abstract
The aim of this research is to develop an in-depth understanding of the dynamics of online group interaction and the relationship between the participation in an online community and an individual's off-line life. The 2½-year study of a thriving online health support community (Bob's ACL WWWBoard) used a broad fieldwork approach, guided by the ethnographic research techniques of observation, interviewing, and archival research in combination with analysis of the group's dynamics during a one-week period. Research tools from the social sciences were used to develop a thick, rich description of the group. The significant findings of this study include: dependable and reliable technology is more important than state-of-the-art technology in this community; strong community development exists despite little differentiation of the community space provided by the software; members reported that participation in the community positively influenced their offline lives; strong group norms of support and reciprocity made externally-driven governance unnecessary; tools used to assess group dynamics in face-to-face groups provide meaningful information about online group dynamics; and, membership patterns in the community and strong subgroups actively contributed to the community's stability and vitality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Linking Ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical
Van Manen, M. (1977) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1080/03626784.1977.11075533 · Cited by 1,623
Tune in, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community
Baym, N. (2000) · doi:10.4135/9781452204710 · Cited by 863
Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development
Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., & Wright, Z. (2002) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/503376.503401 · Cited by 489
Larson, K., & Czerwinski, M. (1998) · CHI 98 Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1145/274644.274649 · Cited by 276
Use of a Home-Care Computer Network by Persons With AIDS
Brennan, P. F., & Ripich, S. (1994) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462300006218 · Cited by 70
Cited by
Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective
Yan, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.02.001 · Cited by 587
Social commerce: The transfer of power from sellers to buyers
Hajli, N., & Sims, J. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.012 · Cited by 298
Wang, X., Zhao, K., & Street, N. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6834 · Cited by 182
Moderated online social therapy: Designing and evaluating technology for mental health
Lederman, R., Wadley, G., Gleeson, J., Bendall, S., & Álvarez-Jiménez, M. (2014) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2513179 · Cited by 151
Talking about your health to strangers: Understanding the use of online social networks by patients
Colineau, N., & Paris, C. (2010) · New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia · doi:10.1080/13614568.2010.496131 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-232
- ISSN
- 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7325
- OpenAlex
- W1999808337
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 34.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.