The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The battle against phishing: Dynamic Security Skins
Abstract
Phishing is a model problem for illustrating usability concerns of privacy and security because both system designers and attackers battle using user interfaces to guide (or misguide) users.We propose a new scheme, Dynamic Security Skins, that allows a remote web server to prove its identity in a way that is easy for a human user to verify and hard for an attacker to spoof. We describe the design of an extension to the Mozilla Firefox browser that implements this scheme.We present two novel interaction techniques to prevent spoofing. First, our browser extension provides a trusted window in the browser dedicated to username and password entry. We use a photographic image to create a trusted path between the user and this window to prevent spoofing of the window and of the text entry fields.Second, our scheme allows the remote server to generate a unique abstract image for each user and each transaction. This image creates a "skin" that automatically customizes the browser window or the user interface elements in the content of a remote web page. Our extension allows the user's browser to independently compute the image that it expects to receive from the server. To authenticate content from the server, the user can visually verify that the images match.We contrast our work with existing anti-phishing proposals. In contrast to other proposals, our scheme places a very low burden on the user in terms of effort, memory and time. To authenticate himself, the user has to recognize only one image and remember one low entropy password, no matter how many servers he wishes to interact with. To authenticate content from an authenticated server, the user only needs to perform one visual matching operation to compare two images. Furthermore, it places a high burden of effort on an attacker to spoof customized security indicators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dhamija, R., Tygar, J. D., & Hearst, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124861 · Cited by 1,376
Self-citationJagatic, T. N., Johnson, N. A., Jakobsson, M., & Menczer, F. (2007) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1290958.1290968 · Cited by 1,156
Cantina: a content-based approach to detecting phishing web sites
Zhang, Y., Hong, J. I., & Cranor, L. F. (2007) · Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/1242572.1242659 · Cited by 757
You've been warned: an empirical study of the effectiveness of web browser phishing warnings
Egelman, S., Cranor, L. F., & Hong, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357219 · Cited by 607
So long, and no thanks for the externalities: the rational rejection of security advice by users
Herley, C. (2009) · Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on New security paradigms workshop · doi:10.1145/1719030.1719050 · Cited by 524
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhamija, R., & Tygar, J. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2005 symposium on Usable privacy and security - SOUPS '05
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 77-88
- OpenAlex
- W2010608681
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The battle against phishing: Dynamic Security Skins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1073001.1073009
- The paper
- Dhamija, R., & Tygar, J. D. (2005). The battle against phishing: Dynamic Security Skins. Proceedings of the 2005 symposium on Usable privacy and security - SOUPS '05. https://doi.org/10.1145/1073001.1073009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.