The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preventing shilling attacks in online recommender systems
Abstract
Collaborative filtering techniques have been successfully employed in recommender systems in order to help users deal with information overload by making high quality personalized recommendations. However, such systems have been shown to be vulnerable to attacks in which malicious users with carefully chosen profiles are inserted into the system in order to push the predictions of some targeted items. In this paper we propose several metrics for analyzing rating patterns of malicious users and evaluate their potential for detecting such shilling attacks. Building upon these results, we propose and evaluate an algorithm for protecting recommender systems against shilling attacks. The algorithm can be employed for monitoring user ratings and removing shilling attacker profiles from the process of computing recommendations, thus maintaining the high quality of the recommendations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
hPSD: A Hybrid PU-Learning-Based Spammer Detection Model for Product Reviews
Wu, Z., Cao, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., & Wu, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2018.2877161 · Cited by 166
On the Detection of Shilling Attacks in Federated Collaborative Filtering
Jiang, Y., Zhou, Y., Wu, D., Li, C., & Wang, Y. (2020) · 2020 International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS) · doi:10.1109/srds51746.2020.00026 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Chirita, P.-A., Nejdl, W., & Zamfir, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM international workshop on Web information and data management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-11-04
- Pages
- 67-74
- OpenAlex
- W2098121414
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preventing shilling attacks in online recommender systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1097047.1097061
- The paper
- Chirita, P.-A., Nejdl, W., & Zamfir, C. (2005). Preventing shilling attacks in online recommender systems. Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM international workshop on Web information and data management. https://doi.org/10.1145/1097047.1097061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.