The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Link mining: a survey
Abstract
Many datasets of interest today are best described as a linked collection of interrelated objects. These may represent homogeneous networks, in which there is a single-object type and link type, or richer, heterogeneous networks, in which there may be multiple object and link types (and possibly other semantic information). Examples of homogeneous networks include single mode social networks, such as people connected by friendship links, or the WWW, a collection of linked web pages. Examples of heterogeneous networks include those in medical domains describing patients, diseases, treatments and contacts, or in bibliographic domains describing publications, authors, and venues. Link mining refers to data mining techniques that explicitly consider these links when building predictive or descriptive models of the linked data. Commonly addressed link mining tasks include object ranking, group detection, collective classification, link prediction and subgraph discovery. While network analysis has been studied in depth in particular areas such as social network analysis, hypertext mining, and web analysis, only recently has there been a cross-fertilization of ideas among these different communities. This is an exciting, rapidly expanding area. In this article, we review some of the common emerging themes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Haveliwala, T. H. (2002) · Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/511446.511513 · Cited by 1,567
Muggleton, S. (1991) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/bf03037089 · Cited by 1,044
Cited by
Cui, P., Wang, X., Pei, J., & Zhu, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2849727 · Cited by 1,274
Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods
Paulheim, H. (2016) · Semantic Web · doi:10.3233/sw-160218 · Cited by 849
Towards identity anonymization on graphs
Liu, K., & Terzi, E. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1376616.1376629 · Cited by 773
Similarity index based on local paths for link prediction of complex networks
Lü, L., Jin, C.-H., & Zhou, T. (2009) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.80.046122 · Cited by 678
Co-author Relationship Prediction in Heterogeneous Bibliographic Networks
Sun, Y., Barber, R., Gupta, M., Aggarwal, C. C., & Han, J. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1109/asonam.2011.112 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Getoor, L., & Diehl, C. P.
- Venue
- ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 3-12
- ISSN
- 1931-0145 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-0153
- OpenAlex
- W2017102965
- Cited by
- 973
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Link mining: a survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1117454.1117456
- The paper
- Getoor, L., & Diehl, C. P. (2005). Link mining: a survey. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. https://doi.org/10.1145/1117454.1117456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.