The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inferring Internet denial-of-service activity
Abstract
In this article, we seek to address a simple question: “How prevalent are denial-of-service attacks in the Internet?” Our motivation is to quantitatively understand the nature of the current threat as well as to enable longer-term analyses of trends and recurring patterns of attacks. We present a new technique, called “backscatter analysis,” that provides a conservative estimate of worldwide denial-of-service activity. We use this approach on 22 traces (each covering a week or more) gathered over three years from 2001 through 2004. Across this corpus we quantitatively assess the number, duration, and focus of attacks, and qualitatively characterize their behavior. In total, we observed over 68,000 attacks directed at over 34,000 distinct victim IP addresses---ranging from well-known e-commerce companies such as Amazon and Hotmail to small foreign ISPs and dial-up connections. We believe our technique is the first to provide quantitative estimates of Internet-wide denial-of-service activity and that this article describes the most comprehensive public measurements of such activity to date.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huang, L., Joseph, A. D., Nelson, B., Rubinstein, B. I. P., & Tygar, J. D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Security and artificial intelligence · doi:10.1145/2046684.2046692 · Cited by 1,194
Internet quarantine: requirements for containing self-propagating code
Moore, D., Shannon, C., Voelker, G. M., & Savage, S. (2004) · IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2003.1209212 · Cited by 494
Self-citationAn Overview of IP Flow-Based Intrusion Detection
Sperotto, A., Schaffrath, G., Sadre, R., Morariu, C., Pras, A., & Stiller, B. (2010) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2010.032210.00054 · Cited by 466
Low-Rate DDoS Attacks Detection and Traceback by Using New Information Metrics
Xiang, Y., Li, K., & Zhou, W. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2011.2107320 · Cited by 375
Understanding Security Requirements and Challenges in Internet of Things (IoT): A Review
Hameed, S., Khan, F. I., & Hameed, B. (2019) · Journal of Computer Networks and Communications · doi:10.1155/2019/9629381 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, D., Shannon, C., Brown, D. J., Voelker, G. M., & Savage, S.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer Systems
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-139
- ISSN
- 0734-2071 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7333
- OpenAlex
- W2081357650
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 82.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring Internet denial-of-service activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1132026.1132027
- The paper
- Moore, D., Shannon, C., Brown, D. J., Voelker, G. M., & Savage, S. (2006). Inferring Internet denial-of-service activity. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1132026.1132027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.